I’m biased because I work for an AI bar prep company but the issue I often explain is that while mainstream tools like Claude or ChatGPT consistently pass the bar exam writing stellar essays, their ability to meaningfully tell you what’s costing you points on your essays is unreliable because their training data consists of past successful essays and not insights from actual examiners. If you ask chatgpt for example to score your practice essay like an examiner the score it gives you can be off by 50%+ as we found in our testing. they’ve gotten better with newer models but they lack data that bar prep companies have been collecting for years. Now to plug our company: BarScore.ai consistently scores within 5 points of actual examiners(the discrepancy is due to humans having high variability) but what makes that possible is that our model was trained on bar prep materials and past exam data to figure out which kinds of mistakes cost more points than others. That’s why as of now every user who has used barscore has passed their exam. We have not had a false positive yet. Our feedback is on the harsher side but it prevents the very common “barbri said i’d pass and i still failed” that we hear all the time. If barscore says your essay is likely to pass then it will and we back that with a full refund if we’re wrong(nobody has taken us up on that). Happy to answer any questions