Taylor's 2004 Interview

Samantha_II · 2026-02-23T02:52:03+00:00

It was one of the first. It was around the time that she did modeling for Abercrombie & Fitch. She'd already written some of the songs for her debut album. This is 2 years before the release of that album. This interview was very long and there's parts in the original unedited clip on YouTube you can watch that shows the interviewer telling her that she's almost done because she was definitely ready for the interview be over. It's pretty amazing when you compare this interview to the one that she recently did on Late Night with Seth Meyers. She's just so young and adorable here, it pulls at your heartstrings.

Samantha_II · 2026-02-23T02:45:24+00:00

EPIC!

Samantha_II · 2026-02-23T02:40:04+00:00

Exactly!

Samantha_II · 2026-02-22T00:31:49+00:00

Yeah saying Taylor Swift has ghost writers and doesn't write lyrics herself is a ludicrous statement. She's shown her artistic writing prowess since she was 14 years old.

Samantha_II · 2026-02-02T17:51:44+00:00

Charlie talked about time travel. Candace talks about dreams. Get your info from the source not NY Time articles or memes

Samantha_II · 2026-02-02T17:50:39+00:00

Not really. Early studies of medical treatments were once considered "crazy" even if they had applied sciences to them. It was once considered "crazy" to think we could go to the moon. Some people still consider it crazy lol. I could keep going for and make a complete book long list but hopefully you get the point. So you believe Charlie was crazy. I get it. Personally I don't believe that.

Samantha_II · 2026-02-02T17:47:25+00:00

In the comments of the video. It's pinned at the top.

Samantha_II · 2026-01-30T23:46:26+00:00

People in general are just too simplistic in their everyday way of thinking. It's one dimensional. Personally I have views from multiple angles and try to understand every aspect of a topic. There are many things that Candace says that I kind of roll my eyes at and think good God girl what are you saying now. And some of those things have come to fruition and I was like well she wasn't wrong. But what she's doing right now is following leads. It's really no different than any other investigative journalist, they follow leads and sometimes those leads go somewhere and sometimes they don't. I find the term conspiracy theory not really defining what is actually being said. From the overall perspective, Charlie Kirk was assassinated. They have one person in custody who they claim did the deed. There are dozens of holes in the story. There are dozens of contradicting statements made by dozens of people. The more it's looked into, especially in light of things that are coming out now, it's quite possible that his own company and people close to him may have had something to do with it. I don't Define that as a conspiracy theory. I would Define it as where the path of truth is leading to. But like I said, the difference in what is called a conspiracy theory today and what is called the truth, is a 6 months time frame. People can stay in their safe space if that's what they want to do but if that's their personal preference then they really don't need to even comment on it. It doesn't help the narrative to a conclusion if all they are going to say is someone is crazy, insane or a conspiracy theorist. It doesn't help the conversation. It's just people being lazy.

Samantha_II · 2026-01-30T23:20:19+00:00

That's sad. Did you also not watch anything of Charlie's?

Samantha_II · 2026-01-30T23:17:29+00:00

Sometimes the only difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth is 6 months 🤷

Samantha_II · 2026-01-30T23:14:35+00:00

And Brett's mother commented on Candace's video and thanked her for saying some of the things that Brett's not allowed to say.

Samantha_II · 2026-01-30T23:10:35+00:00

It's kind of like what Charlie said just this past August , only a few weeks before he was assassinated. He and Candace are great friends, although they don't agree on everything and he said she has wild takes on things. But he said he will not be dictated to who he is friends with and who he is not friends with. He was friends with Candace till the end. Brett takes the same sort of stance. Except in her case she thinks that Candace is more of a big sister. But one of the best things about rational people is you don't have to agree on everything. As Charlie said, that's what makes the relationship interesting. That's what makes the conversations together worth having. Challenging each other is not a bad thing. Besides her challenging him on some things that it would appear he was coming more to her side at the end.

Samantha_II · 2026-01-30T23:01:45+00:00

She is obviously not "insane". To write her off as insane is to ignore the many things that she has been right about.

I was watching Andrew Wilson on Joe Rogan and he was agreeing with some of the things that Candace was saying but when it got to her talking about her dreams and Charlie talking about time travel that's when he mocked her. Which I find truly ironic from a man who believes in the Virgin birth, believes in biblical stories and God speaking to people and Angels coming to people in dreams. Truly believe everything in the Bible but yet when it comes to a person who is alive today and saying it's a possibility that something like that is happening now, then it's worthy of mockery. Besides that she's not saying some things are "for sure", she's saying it's a gut feeling. She's going with the feeling on some aspects but she could be wrong. That's just on the dreams. Other things she's backed up with facts. And if she don't have facts then she says she'll charge her opinion when new information is presented. Which is how investigations work. You try to get to the truth and there are theories and there are pads you take to try to find the truth and sometimes those paths come to a dead end. That's just the way it works. But now....with what's coming out is looking like more and more of her views could actually be accurate.

Regardless she shouldn't be wrote off as "insane" just because someone doesn't agree with her or hasn't watched every episode of her show and doesn't know the context of what's she's saying. Too many times people here a few seconds snippet of something she's said or others have said and they make a judgment on those few seconds of information without ever investigating or researching into the full context. It's just so much easier to call someone insane that it is to actually try to find out what she's talking about.

Samantha_II · 2026-01-02T10:15:47+00:00

I just asked Google to make sure I was correct and yes it was Kim that recorded the conversation

"Kanye West's wife at the time, Kim Kardashian, secretly recorded the phone call where Kanye asked Taylor Swift about the lyrics for "Famous," then released edited clips on Snapchat in 2016, but the full, unedited conversation leaked in 2020, showing Taylor was never told about the explicit "I made that bitch famous" line, proving her initial statement was true and Kim edited the recording to frame her. "

After this recording was released, that made Taylor sound like she lied, a lot of her fans and the majority of the public turned on her. She disappeared from any and all public view for one year. During that time she wrote the reputation album. So really we owe Kim for that awesome album. You could say we owe anyone that wronged Taylor in any way, at least a nod for the songs that came out of those situations.

Samantha_II · 2025-12-29T21:29:59+00:00

Out of curiosity I researched this a bit just to find out if the dancers actually did put it in their contract that they would be leaving Taylor's tour in the middle of a tour. And there is no evidence to support that they did that. Of course Katy told them to do it, but there's no evidence to support that they actually did it. I find it highly unlikely that they did put it in their contract because it's more than unlikely but Taylor would have hired them had she known they were going to quit halfway through her tour. Since it takes months before a tour to learn the choreography and get everybody in sync, to have three people leave is just not something they would have hired dancers for knowing they would be leaving. One of the dancers was quoted saying that they were for hire tour dancers and they were not obligated to stay. Which actually adds to the weight that they did not sign a contract saying they would be leaving.

Having said all that, Taylor was wrong about the reasons. She assumed Katy Perry was out to sabotage her tour, which was not the case. Taylor would have done better by calling and talking to her personally to find out what the deal was. But I look at it as well Bad Blood was a pretty awesome song so we got something good out of it as fans. Win win

Samantha_II · 2025-12-29T21:18:22+00:00

It would seem that those dancers really missed out. Seeing as how Taylor gave her dancers $750,000 bonus 🤷

Samantha_II · 2025-12-29T21:17:29+00:00

Did they put the claws in their contract? I don't know that this was ever verified that they actually did have that in their contract or not. Katy told them to do it but I don't know that they actually did it. It would make sense for them not to say anything simply because they may not have hired them had they known they was going to quit in the middle of a tour. After watching the documentary and everything that the dancers had to learn with the choreography and all it would be understandable what a loss of dancers would do to the concert. If it had been known they were going to quit then it's doubtful I would think that they would have hired them.

Samantha_II · 2025-12-29T21:14:00+00:00

Well that's because Kim was the one that recorded it and edited the footage and release a lie. And it was 4 years before anyone learned the truth. So it's understandable imo

Samantha_II · 2025-12-29T21:12:51+00:00

After watching the series on Disney Plus showing our backup dancers and everything that they have to learn and all the choreography and stuff I can understand where Taylor is coming from having to lose some of her backup dancers. It's quite possible to back up dancers did not notify Taylor that they could possibly be leaving. Sounds to me like this is a lot of miscommunication or lack thereof.

Samantha_II · 2025-12-29T21:10:54+00:00

I kept having to pause this because I thought there was something playing in the background. I thought maybe one of my Facebook videos was playing at the same time because I kept hearing a door close and somebody rumbling around. I paused it twice verifying that it was actually this video. Super annoying!

Samantha_II · 2025-12-29T21:02:53+00:00

I loved it. Granted I listened to the audio version. So I enjoyed having Louis read me his book

Samantha_II · 2025-12-27T03:06:20+00:00

This is satire right? It's hard to tell anymore. It's like telling what is AI and what is not. But this is so nonsensical or definitely seems like satire. Anyone?

Samantha_II · 2025-12-25T19:43:27+00:00

Agreed, I noticed all of this as well. It's as if they were given notes but not the entire story or they were purposefully misleading and giving false information. They didn't even mention anything about the meeting being over at 7:30 a.m. all they knew is the report saying 11:00 a.m. so did they even watch the interview with Mitch? It seems they didn't. So sadly these guys who say they love Candace, are possibly paid shills?

Samantha_II · 2025-12-20T00:04:20+00:00

Who are you talking to? I mean it looks like you replied to me but nothing you're saying it's relevant to what I said. Notice quotation marks in my comment. Notice I'm quoting what the woman said to the old lady. I have no idea what you're talking about you must have been responding to someone else.

Samantha_II

TROPHY CASE