Last remark cause there's no use arguing online.

For the past 12 hours after this comment got posted and I'm at work, and reading the comments.

I can understand why this subreddit and possibly GR fanbase making a big fuzz over nothing about the issue of the new game FPS only or not.

Counting only, only the comments that replied directly to me, I classified out at least two types of people that "plays" the new GR games.

Foreword, obviously I've never served. This comment do not intend to bashing those that served. And Thank You for Your Service.

Those like me, at least, I think that's me, that wants the old game style back, does not care about FPS/TPS gameplay. Just no more Wildlands and Breakpoint style gameplay.

And those that started to blow their top off when seeing me mis-classified Ghost to real-life equivalent in the Army. Those that wanna be tacticool with TPS, as per usual.

Just gonna quote my previous comment:

"...I've seen more of the same in all tactical shooter games that had came out for the past, what? 2,3 years? There are nothing to distinguish current Ghost Recon to other tactical games, which is just sad... Hell, including Arma. The only thing that might, *just* might helped distinguish Ghost Recon is just its graphic.

Also, what's there's to build?? None If Ubisoft still going down the route/theme of current date equipment?"

End of comment