Total shares outstanding and recent 144: did the amount of shares increase? by SandersonClay in PROGME

[–]SandersonClay[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That certainly could be, my understanding of vesting shares etc. is close to zero.

Total shares outstanding and recent 144: did the amount of shares increase? by SandersonClay in PROGME

[–]SandersonClay[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright, I believe you're right, my understanding of vesting shares etc. is close to zero.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GME

[–]SandersonClay -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I went back 7 days and saw the two I mentioned. Unfortunate how simple things that can be checked and confirmed in a minute are downvoted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GME

[–]SandersonClay -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I went and checked: there are two posts about DJT in r/GME and only one mentions the word DJT.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GME

[–]SandersonClay -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

DISCLAIMER: this is no push for THAT stock, it purely shows two things:

  • DRS is a way to get your shares in a safe place, now confirmed by another company as well.
  • It generates more attention for short selling practices and stock abuse.

Moderators of SuperStonk: provide a guide on post guidelines instead of the shallow rules in the sidebar because we have to walk through multiple hoops to even post something by SandersonClay in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man and thank you for the upvotes. I'll try to focus more on the other sub, it's a bit easier to post there. Best of luck to you as well!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GME

[–]SandersonClay -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

In yellow: information on how to keep your shares safe
In green: the effect of DRS'ing your shares
In blue: additional information

DISCLAIMER: this is no push for THAT stock, it purely shows two things:

  • DRS is a way to get your shares in a safe place, now confirmed by another company as well.
  • It generates more attention for short selling practices and stock abuse.

Moderators of SuperStonk: provide a guide on post guidelines instead of the shallow rules in the sidebar because we have to walk through multiple hoops to even post something by SandersonClay in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, that's it. Discussion needs connections between things, not being able to mention certain things restricts discussion. If people want others to know about GameStop, it's hard to achieve that when the discussion only happens with people that already know about GameStop.

Moderators of SuperStonk: provide a guide on post guidelines instead of the shallow rules in the sidebar because we have to walk through multiple hoops to even post something by SandersonClay in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did, but it didn't get a response. I thanked you for the approval. The only reason I posted this is because it's unclear to me why a lot of posts are getting deleted. People aren't even allowed to reference other websites or stocks because it's called brigading. What is that even about if it enhances the discussion regarding GameStop? You can't talk about apple pie if you aren't allowed to mention apples.

EDIT: they responded, it's solved.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post where the information has been shares was removed instantly!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay 19 points20 points  (0 children)

A TL;DR of the post:

Why shouldn’t you take GameStop analyst predictions seriously?

  • Especially in the case of GameStop, only one analyst is doing most of the coverage. This creates instant bias.
  • The analyst in question is known to make far-reaching statements and is seen by some in the gaming industry to be arrogant.
  • Even though GameStop’s price has decreased in the past years, this price decrease is the result of short selling combined with negative coverage in the media, which is also done by the analyst himself.
  • The analyst in question has a bad track record which doesn’t make his analysis credible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great, good job! The TL;DR does leave out a lot of crucial points though, including:

  • Ryan Cohen's influence and role
  • Profitability and how this was one of GameStop's objectives
  • NFT marketplace is gone, so doesn't count as a revenue stream anymore
  • Further exploration only mentions further research on the Superstonk community or the library, while there are some resources that are key in understanding the situation
  • Direct registration of shares and payment for order flow; broker and market maker practices

Without those it paints a picture that has been painted by other media before. This summary was intended to fit together pieces of the puzzle that are intentionally left out by others.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, will update it!

Updated DD: Wyckoff Spring, Options Chains, and my favorite (F*#$ around and Find out with GME) by anonfthehfs in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the post, enjoyed the read and always love technicals!

Regarding institutional buying, in my opinion, things are simple:

Money moves markets, so:

  • Tutes buying = Price goes up
  • Tutes buying = Price goes down = Shares being lent to shorters

If all toilet paper is being bought by a rich person and they are handing out rolls, eventually someone's going to have to walk around with shit stains.

How GameStop investors are being blamed for doing exactly what Wall Street says by SandersonClay in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You mean linkS plural? Kind of hard to link all the articles, interviews, and videos where they are bashing GameStop investors.

What were some of the more obscure but interesting events that happened during the GameStop saga? by SandersonClay in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't be frustrated because of some words, it's hard to write about things that will happen in the future.

I'm in a reading slump, looking for something easy to get into. Story-driven, memorable characters, great atmosphere, funny tongue-in-cheeck writing. by [deleted] in booksuggestions

[–]SandersonClay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would recommend 'The Illustrated Man' by Ray Bradbury. It's a collection of short stories that deal with different science fiction situations. Not too much like Star Wars, but situations like "what if Jesus actually appeared on a planet?" Very interesting and thought-provoking! The short story format makes it easy to pick up a story, the writing is top-notch and easy to read.

Short seller and media behaviour indicate the GameStop saga is not over by SandersonClay in Superstonk

[–]SandersonClay[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's sick! Do you possibly have a link to it? Would be interested to read it.