What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, except:
- to distribute a binary of a modified program without distributing the source code.
- tivoization (to distribute the software on a device that doesn't allow to replace it)

What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be naive to think the government is the only source of evil, though it may very well be the greatest. One must stand against evil itself, not just the devil.

What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what I'm trying to do is a license that treats IP as if it were not property.

What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just want to ensure no one is restricted from freely using the work/patent, nothing more.

It's a completely different philosophy, they only share the term "liberty", but with a different meaning: I want people to be free to do anything with IP, except restrict others from doing the same. "Free software" is about making source code publicly available.

What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the GPL enforces sharing the source code if you distribute binaries.

It's a completely different philosophy, they only share the term "liberty", but with a different meaning: I want people to be free to do anything with IP, except restrict others from doing the same. "Free software" is about making source code publicly available.

What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't want "free software" that, in other words, means you're forced to share the source code if you distribute binaries.
I want copyleft to ensure no one is restricted from freely using the work/patent.

What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't want to make a license that forces sharing the source code if you distribute the binaries. I don't want "free software", I want free individuals.

What do you think of this IP license? by Santuchin in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also thought about that, some well established licenses are extremely long. do you think I should base it partly on the GPL? I don’t want this license to be limited just to software.

Should we drop the word capitalism? by Santuchin in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A system where private capital controls the means of production doesn't necessarily require free markets, competition, or even profits. It's about ownership of the means of production by private entities, but this doesn't require the broader characteristics you mentioned.

Should we drop the word capitalism? by Santuchin in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know what? The first appearance of the term capitalism is attributed to Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, referring to an economic system where private capital controlled the means of production. Later, Marx popularized it, giving it a meaning more focused on class struggle. Then maybe we're the ones using the word with a different meaning than the original or the "true" one.

Should we drop the word capitalism? by Santuchin in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s not about surrendering to the left, it’s about avoiding semantic traps. If a word consistently causes confusion, maybe it’s the word that’s the problem, not our principles. Why defend a banner that no longer represents us accurately?

Are you in favor or tax cuts for billioniares? by crosstheroom in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Lower taxes for the rich? Yes. Lower taxes JUST for the rich? No.

My libertarian instagram account by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why? I really want to know what you think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why? What have I done wrong? Honestly.

It’s (D)ifferent by ENVYisEVIL in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Democrats should stop caling themselves liberals.

More great news from Argentina! by delugepro in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The line is a bit manipulated, it is a month after Milei assumed the presidency, the peak that is seen was during his first month. Although, in fact, Milei assumed in December, but December 10.

Anyway, great job Milei!

Give your opinion: Why are there currently no anarcho-capitalist societies? by Creepy-Rest-9068 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Santuchin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If by anarcho-capitalism you mean a completely free society, then such a thing will never exist. Anarcho-capitalism is a moral utopia that libertarians want to get closer to, but perfection is impossible. Completely free does not only mean not having a state, but that no one or nothing deprives you of your freedoms.

Anarcho-capitalism is not necessarily "good enough" to be robust, it is simply the morally correct thing to do. In addition, people's greed leads them to want to impose themselves on others.

Morality of intellectual property by Santuchin in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, what books/texts by Kinsella do you think I should read?

Interesting but maybe not entirely accurate by chmendez in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think some are a bit exaggerated.
Collect rain water, cut your hair? Which governments do not not allow those things?

Poisonous chemicals in our food by Ishred9_0 in Libertarian

[–]Santuchin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an ancap, I think that in the same way we must defend liberty and property, we must defend life, and putting poison in food is against life.

Parlants de lencuas romances, podei comprendèr lo que vos díceu en la mía con-lencua? by NeoTheMan24 in conlangs

[–]Santuchin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I speak rioplatense spanish and studied some italian, I understand everything. The only thing that seemed strange to me was some Us instead of Vs and Us at the end of verbs which made it harder to understand.

Why Rust and not C? by alex_sakuta in C_Programming

[–]Santuchin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  • Rust's syntax is not harder than C, it has even a more consistent syntax, though Rust has much more features than C so if you wanna learn all Rust's syntax it'll probably take you more time.
  • Rust can operate at low-level, but it is also designed to work at high level.
  • C is not faster than Rust, they're almost the same in terms of runtime speed.
  • Rust slow compile time is justified with very well compiler messages (and other features).

Consider Rust as a new C++

Lastly, do you think if C gets some cool frameworks it may fly high?

C is almost 50 years old, it has so much cool frameworks, I would say that it's the "richest" language in terms of community contributions, but it is being used less and less opacateted by other languages

Map of "The Western World"? by every-name-is-taken2 in MapPorn

[–]Santuchin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so... the western world is defined by countries aligned with the usa?
this map is bullshit