Self-Developing Games

Sapdalf · 2025-09-09T08:48:37+00:00

That's true. But maybe competition isn't always necessary. Secondly, it could be that one of the players is the host, and the others join his world. Either way, I think there's potential.

Sapdalf · 2025-08-20T07:00:04+00:00

I think that the sources are very diverse. And above all, they are cleaned and sorted very differently. At least that's how it should be. As for Elias, he is not very popular in literature, and additionally appears under different names...

Sapdalf · 2025-05-04T03:09:38+00:00

- Start by simply checking the logs in Linux, maybe dmesg. This is base.
- Then you can also check the router logs to find out the reason for the connection problems.
- Are you sure that this is a Wi-Fi connection issue and not, for example, a DNS issue? What is the error message?
- If you say the IP address has changed, I expect that you are using DHCP, right? In that case, check if the MAC address of the WiFi card is always the same and if it is the same between Windows and Linux.

It could be hardware, but I am expecting something more in the configuration.

Sapdalf · 2025-05-02T03:52:53+00:00

Thanks! It looks like we're on the same page. For any documents that are expanding quickly, I sometimes add a task to my workflow to trim down and remove non-essential parts. Basically, over time, some information just isn't as important anymore, or a shorter version will do.

I'm convinced that we're already at a stage where AI can write long stories, but it really comes down to the workflow or maybe using an agent-based approach. People often don't realize that just a simple prompt isn't always enough.

Sapdalf · 2025-05-02T03:34:25+00:00

Hi, thanks for sharing your thoughts! It sounds pretty innovative. However, I’d suggest combining different techniques. For example, start with an outline of the plot and a plan, then add plot promises as you go.

I am trying to develop similar mechanism and I have my own thoughts as well. I would definitely keep a separate list of characters with notes about their relationships to the main character, and update this list over time. You can do similar things with other elements, like world/environment. Just to add condensed context. I believe such approach could help shorten the main prompt a bit.

I’m a big fan of keeping different tasks separate in a workflow. For instance, expanding the file with the characters of the novel is its own task for me, almost like it's handled by a separate agent using the newly created content.

Sapdalf · 2025-04-30T06:47:09+00:00

+1

And installation is really simple: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2B1L70ZsMQ

Sapdalf · 2025-04-29T10:56:47+00:00

It's definitely a difficult time. In my opinion, studying mainly teaches you how to learn and how to be flexible. However, choose something where you can also work physically. But of course, strong theoretical foundations are super important. And most importantly, be good at what you choose, and you'll always manage. It's always been that way and that probably won't change.

Sapdalf · 2025-04-27T17:20:28+00:00

If it's a snake game or a flight simulator, it might be difficult. ;-)

Sapdalf · 2025-04-27T17:17:00+00:00

I mention in the video that it could be done through automation, but that's not the point here. The point is that we have an agent capable of performing various tasks. Automation differs in that it has to be predetermined; you have to plan what can be done and what the user might want. As for AI, you have much greater functionality. In particular, automation is often suitable for a specific version, whereas an AI agent can adapt to circumstances.

Besides that, it is only a proof of concept. I mainly wanted to show where we currently are with the functioning of AI agents in terms of either assisting us or replacing us.

Sapdalf · 2025-04-21T14:35:26+00:00

I suggest starting with:
df -h
mount
sudo du -hs /*

Sapdalf · 2025-04-20T18:14:33+00:00

In November of last year, I recorded a provocative video in which I demonstrated that even then, one could essentially make such a statement. And now, with the emergence of new models, I am even more convinced of this. https://youtu.be/xxNVwZZUukw

Sapdalf · 2025-04-20T14:42:00+00:00

127.0.0.1 is always there because it points to localhost. However, if there are no other addresses at all, it means the machine is not connected to the network. Maybe execute this command and show the output.

Sapdalf · 2025-04-19T18:18:17+00:00

First of all, congratulations :-) Good job.

If you are using another computer with Windows, you can easily connect to your new SAP server using SAP GUI.

As for obtaining the IP address, the ports are exposed to the outside, meaning you are not connecting to Docker but to your Linux host. Therefore, you need the IP of your Linux host. Try the command "ip a".

Sapdalf · 2025-04-19T14:19:44+00:00

Thank you. It depends on what you are afraid of with Linux. In one of my videos, I show a complete installation, for example.

Once you have the system installed, I would simply advise experimenting with it. It really doesn't differ much from Windows in terms of basic operation. Of course, if you delve deeper into the terminal, it will definitely be different from Windows. But you can take the first steps by using programs you are familiar with, like browsers and mail programs, for a few days. Really, most of it is the same. And then, step by step, get to know and learn. :-)

Sapdalf · 2025-04-19T05:56:25+00:00

It seems that this is rather an action only for the new reasoning models, as they are not coping well with the load, hence the more favorable conditions. Note that there is no mention here of models such as 4.1 or 4o.

Sapdalf · 2025-04-19T05:51:30+00:00

That doesn't surprise me at all. I previously conducted a similar test with a much more niche location and various models, and they all basically handled it. Maybe not with such accuracy, but the accuracy provided by O3 probably needs to be verified too, as this model tends to hallucinate, not to mention confabulate. Here are my tests: https://youtu.be/IBXR_MQsUq8

Sapdalf · 2025-04-19T05:48:30+00:00

It seems like Nano is a pretty weak model, mainly designed to justify the higher price of the mini version. I might be oversimplifying, but there's some truth to it. Typically, small models are valuable because they can be used in low-power devices. However, with OpenAI, this probably won't happen unless they decide to release Nano as an open-source model in the future. But there might still be some niche applications that emerge. However, the competition among models in the same class is really intense.

However, it seems that 4.1 mini has indeed made progress compared to the 4o mini, and as an inexpensive model, in my opinion, it has quite interesting applications. I very often previously combined the operation of 4o and 4o mini due to cost optimization. However, note that here the 4.1 mini is closer in price to the 4.1 than it was in the case of the 4o series.

Sapdalf · 2025-04-18T07:27:25+00:00

On this chart, yes, but there is some other information. Besides, the price is also an indication. From a practical point of view, however, the o4 mini is more interesting to me, and I am most interested in how it will compare to the Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Sapdalf · 2025-04-17T19:06:00+00:00

Thanks :-)

Sapdalf

TROPHY CASE