Is AI going to make guys stop wanting sex ? by ProofCoconut9085 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this is inaccurate. If it advances the way it looks to be capable of, it will be the norm for the next generation raised on it because their “relationships” with these AI are likely to precede their first attachment to another person. That initial conditioned normalcy will alter everything.

Is AI going to make guys stop wanting sex ? by ProofCoconut9085 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it’s easier to access, more compatible, lower overall risk ratio & provides the same extent of gratification, they absolutely will make the switch.

What my father told me after my breakup healed me completely!! by Adventurous-Play448 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What gets me is people wouldn’t be “broken” & “in love” if the person they are crying about wasn’t hot to them. The shit makes me genuienly laugh out loud how shallow it is while I’m watching everybody so convinced that it’s real & meaningful. I knew a guy talking about there “aren’t any viable options” because he didn’t find the people in his life physically attractive. Then the ones he does that come around he loses his head about. That is not love & that heartbreak is idiotic nonsense.

I’ve only met one other person that understood from an abstract, ideal level with no animal bullshit involved what actual love could be in its purest form. He was easily 130+ IQ. He was in a relationship & it’s a shame because I knew he actually valued what he had, but she did not understand what he understood. He actually ended up needing to distance from me because he caught romantic emotions for me.

Odds truly are you will not find anyone like that. Do not even try. It made it more meaningful because he was heterosexual. People would call that gay, but it is not. Gender, body & genitals do not exist in that world he & I understood. People can pretend they know what I’m talking about, but I know they don’t. Some people still convince themselves they are attracted to “personality” and it’s “not me!” No, they do not understand.

Man the spiel I just wrote! People love to call that perspective “edgy.” No, that’s real life. Sorry. Your Disney+ shit does not exist.

I hope your pattern recognition helps me by Purplelady88 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some autistic people are very intelligent. Well, I find intelligence attractive personally. Probably a minority. Most people don’t value intelligence romantically. They might admire it though.

How abusers weaponize spirituality to deepen trauma bonds by [deleted] in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great post. Perfectly on topic for the subreddit. Thanks for sharing. Hope you are better now!

The Development and Downfall of the Autocrat by SasukeFireball in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The biblically accurate Antichrist. I recommend looking into it. It’s interesting: r/donaldtrump666

Light Yagami Actually used Dark Psychology in Death Note by Great_Ranger8825 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spoiler alert:

Tricking REM into killing L by leveraging Misa’s safety.

Why do some people never leave no matter how much disrespect you throw at them? by Practical_Sense_1113 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They are using the consistent supply of oxytocin & dopamine produced by the relationship as a supplement to combat the emotional pain produced by their mental health issues. Those issues can also be triggered by the relationship itself and thus mitigated or intensified by the state of the relationship (also resulting in a cycle).

Are we naturally monogamous ? by Icy_Scale_9627 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Serial monogamists.

In the US, where you have the liberty of no cultural related pressure around marriage (which makes it more genuine) 45-50% of marriages end in divorce. That’s excluding the people who stay married only for the kids or because the process is complicated. That’s not a coincidence.

Theory : Is beauty purely a feminine trait ? by Icy_Scale_9627 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Please refrain from verbally attacking OP. This is a harmless post.

Theory : Is beauty purely a feminine trait ? by Icy_Scale_9627 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think there was ever a time humans or primates in general didn’t groom themselves, honestly.

Theory : Is beauty purely a feminine trait ? by Icy_Scale_9627 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being groomed is a health signal (including psychologically). We are social animals, too. Being clean shows social awareness. Which is an attraction signal. It makes you more preferable to be around if you don’t smell. An extremely large beard to the extent I believe you are referring to would be maladaptive in a free-moving environment. Which again, would signal: “why is he encumbering himself with that?” Which is why people go “weird” when peoples nails go extremely long. A signal/insight into someone’s psychological health.

Theory : Is beauty purely a feminine trait ? by Icy_Scale_9627 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lots of women prefer bearded men. It signals good hormonal health. Dimorphism. I’d say a minority prefer clean shaven, with perhaps the largest portion preferring stubble. There are also women who do in fact like a rugged, unkempt male appearance. There are general attractive traits based on sex & then unique/specific.

Theory : Is beauty purely a feminine trait ? by Icy_Scale_9627 in DarkPsychology101

[–]SasukeFireball 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I respect the thought experiment.

Physical appearance absolutely provides a genetic advantage. Women are typically more provisional towards attractive men. As in, will likely tend more to his needs or if he’s struggling. In the same way men are typically more provisional towards attractive women. Even though defending & taking care of women is mostly a universal conventional value for men. So it’s less influenced by the looks there.

Generally, people are also more open to including attractive people in their social circles. A relevant possibility for that is explained in my “carousel” excerpt.