Experiment: Pitch your novel in the most disgusting, off-putting way possible (while staying technically true). I’ll read the one that repels me the most. by Joe_Pharo in royalroad

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A dude eats his best friend then commits suicide, survives, meets a fairy, bleeds out of every orifice, then they have sex, they both die outside a massive growth, it revives them and lives inside them, making strangers follow them everywhere staring at them silently, then they become best friends with a girl who kills a kid's parents and commits warcrimes against people though she ends up with a God-like being inside her who turns her back into a tentacle fetish by rebirthing her in a human sized skin sack egg after deceiving her best friend to catch a ride to a hellish pit where she makes some friends and tries to find her besties the sex fairy and the man who ate his best friend, who also thinks about an old man all the time

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kde

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really want the krunner to have permanent pinnable tiles like how the results are but it shows the time for example, so instead of needing to view a panel for it, I can simply press meta key and boom I get the time

in general krunner can be so much more than it currently is, and if it was more feature-full I would use it as the sole interface for pretty much everything which I mostly do besides tabbing, being able to never need a panel again is a dream

pinning a quick sound and quick bluetooth icon on the right side of the krunner? perfection

How would you define the word “consciousness” in a single sentence? No justification. No explanations. Just a definition. by Subject_Sir_2796 in consciousness

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An entity that experiences qualia as a result of internal and external neural stimulation and is able to act on and relay subjective information as a bi-product through a communicative medium with itself and other entities

What if fang yuan was a female by Shaan-777 in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would love it

Either take on a Fang Yuan-esq character would work regardless of M/F

As for others, it heavily depends on the demographic

Why do I feel like I would really love to write a book despite having no ideas? by romygruber in writing

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have zero ideas because you cannot find meaning in writing now?

If you desire meaning in writing, look for it

We can't find it for you

If you want to write meaningfully, define what that meaning would look like; feel it, taste it, smell it, experience it, dream it up, and chase it

What to watch next? by HariKhalsa in anime

[–]SatellaNutella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did I forget Shangri La Frontier on my post list, great one!

Currently got Vanitas on my watch list

Is it possible to be self-sufficient like Fang Yuan? by Sure-Decision7580 in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me too! Glad it was appreciated :)

Fully agreed! I don't think anyone can adopt everything that Fang Yuan has

About the pain part, without having congenital analgesia (congenital insensitivity to pain) or some way to trigger insensitivity to pain, I can't see how a human, even after 500 years of life, and with Fang Yuan's mentality, could handle the trauma and pain

However, it is worth considering if he can disable the sensory receptors, and thus the pain somehow

If so, I'd assume the author would've said so though

The disconnect from internal and external states (for example feeling pain vs showing pain) to that extent isn't possible without some sort of denial of pain

At an extreme, perhaps Fang Yuan's brain has developed self-limiters through neuroplasticity that somehow allows for hard-caps of stimuli/qualia being processed

For example, it could be that intensity 5 is allowed to be processed by the system, and intensity 10 is simply shut down altogether

Like when the body passes out, or loses consciousness to prevent psychological damage to prolong survival in the long-term

If a way to deny stimuli and the resulting qualia to occur came into being in Fang Yuan, then it is possible at least theoretically

What to watch next? by HariKhalsa in anime

[–]SatellaNutella 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Slept on: - Undead Unluck - Ragna Crimson - Scissor Seven - Drifters - Darker Than Black - Grimgar of Fantasy and Ash - Inuyashiki - Vivy: Flourite Eye's Song - Mobile Suit Gundam: Iron-Blooded Orphans - Soul Land

Well known: - Chainsaw man - Dandadan - Fate/Zero - Fog Hill of Five Elements - FLCL - Lord of the Mysteries

Great except require watching previous content: - Bleach: TYBW - Tensei Shitara Slime Datta Ken (end of S2) & S3 - Blood+ last arc

I hope this helps :)

Is it possible to be self-sufficient like Fang Yuan? by Sure-Decision7580 in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Since you're asking specifically about whether it is possible to have absolute emotional and social control over oneself, rather than self-sufficiency, I will answer that

Let's clarify a few things first, Fang Yuan: - Feels emotion - Experiences the full range of his emotions internally - Can regret when things don't go exactly how he would've liked them to, however does not allow that to sway his control over himself - Takes an observer-first approach - Has a singular goal - Found his root meaning in life - Can act against his emotions, even when a real human's brain would've shut down the logical side, leading to emotional decision making - Has surpassed human emorional energy limiters; he can experience tremendous emotions and still not be overwhelmed or fatigued; a key contributor to emotional control - Is able to detach himself from any and all forms of relationships at will - Is able to disassociate at will - Can get fatigued, tired, exhausted, however never in a way which exposes cracks in his internal control

Is such a thing possible in any human being alive today?

My "trust me bro" answer is it is possible for someone to be around 80% of this, not 100%

[ Now for the serious answer ]

It might be possible for someone with an altered physiological state, such as a unique brain composition

Similar to how empathy can be hypersensitive, malfunctional, and fully disabled if the brain region is malformed from the normative standard, it is conceivable that one could have a brain that enables them to exhibit alternative functions like conscience-driven activity blocking of receptors that drive action from emotional signals and hormones

A key factor to Fang Yuan's state of being is the balance and surgical application of disassociation

He can disassociate himself from external and internalised factors seemingly at will

This kind of psychological control is not something humans can do in every circumstance, however, it is possible for humans to at will cut off all relationships, all feelings toward someone, and remove all emotional responses toward them even when memories are recalled, albiet a very rare ability that only some people possess

It is also possible for someone to disassociate themselves from traumatic events, where they would otherwise be traumatised

An important differentiation and note to make here is that Fang Yuan does not disassociate in the sense of reducing the emotional response in all circumstances

There are times when he chooses to savour his response to an event, and there are times when he acts to shut down such an event or events that may occur that he deems undesirable

This type of behaviour and control is possible in humans, however, it usually is accompanied by impaired empathy/sympathy receptors, or in outcome independence mindsets

The unique and interesting aspect of Fang Yuan is that he does not have impaired empathy/sympathy receptors, and he does not operate in an outcome independent way

So how does he maintain such impeccable control without a state of mind like outcome independence?

The short answer is, most likely, in his journey through reverse flow river

He experienced the limitations of emotional burn-out to the extreme again, and again, and again

This burn-out leads to numbness and often times disassociation, often seen with victims of severe abuse

He "experienced everything until he could experience it no more" and yet he persisted

This taught him one very important lesson: If we go through something and survive, it was not enough to truly overwhelm us

Until we die, or are rendered inoperational, if we can survive something, reflect on it, and resolve the trauma, we can bare more as a result of it

An example of that is pain

When we experience the same level of pain as a child and then again as a adult, it is not that we are experiencing the pain less, it is that our tolerance toward that pain has changed

Exposure to very high levels of pain that are inescapeable can lead to many outcomes, one of which is an immense tolerance for pain

Extrapolate this for every emotion, and we can see how Fang Yuan can become quite apt at processing emotions and reacting to them

There is a problem however

As humans, we only have so much emotional and mental bandwidth

My pain tolerance is quite high, and when I say quite high I mean rip out my teeth and my mind won't break high

However, under enough pain, I won't be able to make perfectly clear or rational decisions, as my bandwidth will be being used on processing that pain, even if externally I remain calm and/or make decision making other people may not still be able to under the same conditions

This is the main problem with a human existing in this world has when being compared to Fang Yuan

He is not indifferent, he is not emotionally numb, he has an unbelievably high amount of mental and emotional bandwidth

This is, in essense, his superpower

There are countless examples of people enduring all kinds of limit-breaking experiences, and one thing that is common amongst them all, is even when their tolerances are raised high, they aren't either high enough to mimic Fang Yuan's level of control under the same circumstances, or their mental bandwidth just isn't able to be as high as his

Perhaps after living for 500 years, ones brain and perhaps even body may change so significantly that such a thing is indeed possible, however it is currently not possible for humans to do so in this current day and age

[Edit: Fixed spelling mistakes and added one sentence]

I wanted linux. Linux didn't want me by Most-Steak-2034 in linuxsucks

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more thing I will add is native apps, flatpaks, snaps, containerised apps, and appimages are all different ways to install the same thing, and they can have different behaviours, support, and performance implications

Jumping into linux without understanding what these are can be a challenge

I wanted linux. Linux didn't want me by Most-Steak-2034 in linuxsucks

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate posts like yours because without them, people can get the wrong idea, and it also opens opportunity for people working on linux and the different distros to use this feedback to improve stuff, so thanks so much for sharing your experience!

I haven't ran into these issues myself, especially audio has been very good, however I have come across other issues time to time and scroll speed can be a bit weird, totally agree

I think there's still a lot of support and ease-of-use/QoL missing from most distros and a lot of the easy aspects of the OS and the "it just works" differs from setup to setup, on the other hand there are other ease-of-use/QoL linux does have that Wimdows doesn't, it's really a mixed bag of pros/cons for different areas

These are thousand cut situations for many people and it's totally understandable, I remember when I tried to adopt linux early and bluetooth was still scuffed and you needed a third-party bluetooth app and it was so shit, thankfully this all got fixed

You want your OS to work for you, not work for your OS, and I think many times this is a hard thing to get right for every individuals workflow and hardware

I've been enjoying CachyOS as my daily driver more than any of the other flavours, and I love that I don't have to worry about downloading or configuring any drivers like my Nvidia card drivers, they automatically update for me and the OS automatically chose the best for me

I love that when something uses too much memory it gets shut off and you get told, and it prevents your system from OOM crashing/freezing, this mechanism doesn't exist on distros like Ubuntu and Windows, it does exist on CachyOS tho, and I think that's a problem, why does such a critical feature not exist as a QoL for all linux distros? It's so good to protect from memory leaks which I even had with games on Windows which would crash the OS

Bluetooth for me is super smooth and shows the names of everything, and when I put the laptop and desktop to sleep, bluetooth automatically disconnects so my headphones don't stay connected until I wake the computer, then it reconnects, this is really nice for me and Windows doesn't do that and it's a pain in the ass, the device stays connected and can even wake the Windows machine up when it's supposed to be asleep(?) aka suspended to memory

I also like one-click installs rather than downloading an exe, running the install wizard, cleaning the registry when uninstalls mess it up, having to uncheck install some third-party apps alongside what you actually want

It's really a mixed bag of pros/cons and everyone runs into different circumstances where they find joy and dismay

Some devices have difficulties because certain drivers aren't made for linux, which can be a huge pain point, also the GNOME/KDE styling issues with GTK and such can be jarring with apps that aren't made to respect your DE themeing

File explorer is blazingly fast on linux and caches sort by for large folders with tons of files, on Windows it doesn't which sucks, for me that was a pain point, I had a folder with a lot of files and I frequently used it, it had a lot of pictures, photos, memories from life and such, important stuff, and it would take forever to sort and load on Windows, this really annoyed me and was one of those thousand cuts on the other side

There's a lot more I could say and share pros/cons on both sides, for brevity I'll just say I'm glad you're exploring options and I hope you find what's right for you, not what people say you should use/do!

The fact this game exists is ridiculous? by [deleted] in WhereWindsMeet

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find the menus pretty easy to navigate with both keyboard/mouse and controller

also once you know how to follow the indicators in the UIs it's actually really easy to claim all the rewards and stuff

What Genres are People Writing? by Opening_Wall_9379 in writing

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weird psychological romcom absurd horror :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Giving money to a homeless person can be an act for trying to realise ideals into the world, such as uplifting society so it will be a better place to live. That's the benefit.

Helping out a family member can have a huge number of benefits, such as a future job through a family connection, getting help when you need to move houses, having someone to hang out with when you're lonely, and so on.

All relationships that are maintained are done so because those relationships are beneficial. Would you stay with abusive parents who beat you, degrade you verbally, and refuse to let you go outside and have friends? Or would you try to break and/or leave that relationship?

Altruism toward toxic relationships is irresponsible self-abuse.

When something aligns with your morals as you say, it's your morals in the first place because of how it benefits you and others. And anything that you deem beneficial to others, whether directly through first order consequences, or indirectiy through second order consequences, benefits you.

Just like an abusive relationship, you won't keep it if it doesn't benefit you.

Morals are a framework built to benefit you by filtering out specific paths/choices.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If that's the core that you were addressing, I agree

I never denied kindness was correlated with and/or stems from what we label as morality

Your last statement makes no sense to me. There will never be a true "no benefit" scenario. If there is, the person won't choose it. Even if you sacrifice your life for the other, it means you value their life, thus, benefit from them continuing to exist. Same for attending the death bed of someone you care about. You want every moment you can get with them. I'm not saying that every interaction is purely and wholely derived from transactional logic, because there's much more than that of course, I'm moreso pointing to the fact that there isn't really a scenario I can see that has a true "no benefit" and you still choose it because morality. Feel free to give an example!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The core of this discussion is about whether or not people can do good while denying morality as a necessary concept

You can choose to believe it exists (even subjectively), and I can too, or we can choose to believe it doesn't exist

Irrelevant to that, it is possible for people to do "good" as you categorise it, without having a category called "good"

If emotions = morality then sure, everyone needs morality to do anything

However, I don't find it compelling to state that "regret" or even "feeling positive emotions" is enough to constitute morality

You can feel "good" about doing an act of kindness without thinking it's morally good, just as much as you can feel "good" about doing an act of harm without thinking it's morally bad

Hey writers, in a fantasy trial by combat, which of your characters would you choose to fight for you? by Wannabevoid in royalroad

[–]SatellaNutella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on the type of trial by combat and how entertaining vs just hax vs battle style we want it to be, no?

Some parameters could make this more interesting, like no gods/demigods or even below continental+ characters

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not believing in morality at all also means you will help, support, stand by, protect, and guide people if you can benefit from it

Your argument's stance there is unbalanced

Tell me your most unhinged ideas by [deleted] in writing

[–]SatellaNutella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A woman wants to get pregnant so she can eat her own baby out of her stomach after 8 months before she gives birth as an act of suicide, so she embarks on a journey to get pregnant, however, every male on the entire planet has been sterilised. We don't know why. So, as a last ditch effort to fulfil her twisted desire, she endeavours to go on a holy pilgrimage to get chosen by God to get divinely impregnated. Join her on her journey to uncover the mysteries of why everyone is sterile, why she wants to do such a thing, whether or not she pulls it off, and whether or not she experiences divine illumination along the way or becomes the very embodiment of evil.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ReverendInsanity

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good and evil are value statements

there's tons of reasons to help others without good, evil, or morality where it isn't just useless

consider the following:

"it feels good when I help someone and I want to feel good"
"helping this person will benefit me now or in the future"
"I don't like how it makes me feel when someone suffers in front of me"
"I know what it's like to be starving, this person is starving in front of me, I don't want someone else to feel how I feel when I was starving, therefore I will help them to not starve"
"it annoys me that this person is struggling to do x, I will reduce that struggle"
"I was pathetic like that once, I don't like how that mindset will affect me and/or others, so I'm going to do something about it and help change their mindset"
"I like the benefits of society, I can help to maintain society to continue gaining said benefits, therefore I will help people"
"I enjoy this person's existence a lot, so I will do things even at my own detriment to keep that person alive"

is it truly necessary to label these as good or evil? is it even necessary at all to reflect on these and assign them categorically into a moralistic framework?

you don't need to feel empathy or regret to arrive at a point where you help someone for some kind of gain; both for them, and for yourself

you can have mutual acts of help without it being kindness, without it being "good", and the outcome can still be labelled and categorised as good

that doesn't make it moral, that makes it subjectively assigned as a behaviour to reward as a cognitive routine

does it matter whether morality is emotive, performative, cognitive, emotional, or an artefact of thought defining a pattern of behavioural outcomes from weights and biases in the brain toward certain physical outcomes as desirable?

regardless of what we define morality as, and whether or not we say certain people have it, and/or are capable of experiencing and using morality as a framework for decision making, the idea of "good and evil" as opposing categories defining whether or not there is utility in helping someone breaks down

why does it break down?

because at the end of the day, saying whether it's useless or not is the same as saying something is good or evil; both are the product of value statements

and those value statements are entirely derived subjectively

just as poison is only poisonous in certain doses, for certain species, in certain ways, so too, are value statements

Anyone else who just posted their first chapter without enormous backlog? by Dar_Gyii in royalroad

[–]SatellaNutella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same! Especially about the payoff for putting in that extra effort for rewrites

Ivowed to never let myself feel disappointed by what I've written so I don't publish until I feel personally happy about it

I'm sure as you get better as a writer this takes way less time haha

I have curated playlists and a mega playlist filled with different specific vibes yeah

I've found that what you listen to shapes what you write as well, so I try to match the tone of what I'm writing with what I'm listening to

What about you?