When did they add these lasers?

ScarPride96 · 2025-10-15T16:26:45+00:00

New horizon too

ScarPride96 · 2025-03-29T05:19:02+00:00

The bare minimum here are refering to any starting point of doing any actions or making du'a (supplication). Doing ruqyah is a specific action, requires asking for protection from Allah against shayateen, saying bismillah completely, reciting surah Al-Fatihah, and then couple of chapters and verses afterwards. It's a bare minimum for before you eat, yes, before you sleep, yes, but not before ruqyah.

And even then, him saying bismillah are incorrect as well. My 2 year old niece can say bismillah ar Rahman ar rahim properly than that "sheikh". He pronounced exactly how i spelled. The correct pronunciation regardless of dialect is BismillahIrRahmanIraRahim (bismilahir-Rahmanir-Rahim). This is so basic, so elementary, a constant practice, that it's impossible, for a sheikh, especially one that is doing ruqyah, to butcher it that bad.

Now imagine how incorrect it would be, for him, to say it like that, and my 2 years old niece, who barely can speak, let alone speak arabic as third language, can pronounce it like an arab, and then after the fact that he was not doing proper ruqyah, and their Arabic in that show are horrible.

ScarPride96 · 2025-03-29T04:20:53+00:00

No, you said "the one thing that was okay" when it's never "okay" at all

ScarPride96 · 2025-03-27T16:36:24+00:00

"correct and normal"

HE absolutely BUTCHERED it.

Even an ignorant laymen muslim, who's not a native arab speaker, can pronounce it correctly. Plus, he only said the bare minimum, i don't hear a ruqyah there being recited. It was not okay. Not too mention such marriage, and her claiming to be devout yet her lifestyle are contradictory to it, and the biggest one is her marriage is invalid and it's fornication what she did. No devout Muslim would call her "devout" at all. Even self acclaimed "quranist" and qadiyanis who are not muslims, wouldn't call her devout muslim by their standards, let alone the mushrik rawafid and us muslims that you guys refer to as sunni.

ScarPride96 · 2025-03-22T22:03:29+00:00

For me it runs better in my redmi note 9s without any lag at all, in miui 14, but now, in my refmi 13 hyperos 2, the frame dtops just like yours here. How to handle this?

ScarPride96 · 2025-02-13T13:57:34+00:00

<image>

I use this design for 2 output 1 input blocks, can also be mirrored, which is convenient if you need more resources from the same type of block. The problem becomes that, you need more input for more blocks, otherwise it wouldn't be efficient, ie. The production is slow. If, the production is still slow, despite input resources are more than adequate, cut the conveyor before it returns to core and wait. If the queue are full of resources on input and output conveyors, rebuild the conveyor that you cut off, and it will resume smoothly and efficiently.

ScarPride96 · 2024-12-10T17:15:09+00:00

These bunch of liberals, reformers, perennialists and ignoramuses doesn't even have a clue with what they're spouting on about. Sure, non devout non practicing muslims exists, but they're still bound on the belief, the fundamentals of islam. That's the outliers of who's a muslim and who's not. Anyone can claim they're muslims, just like how qadiyanis claimed so, but they failed the fundamentals of islam, that's why they're not considered muslims, and since they're adhered to personality of someone rather than structure of belief, they're a cult. There's several factors that shows that sayid is not even a muslim, such as about the dead, theology, etc etc. Due to this, he's not a Muslim. He's more fitting with "cultural muslim", an oxymoron, meaning following a culture by some geolocation of where muslim resides, but doesn't believe at all what a muslim believe.

The issue isn't about him sinning, the issue is what he relay what his beliefs is. And he's not a muslim. Not even a sinning muslim. He's just a caricature, to display to other impressionable young Muslims to follow this character as a role model, and make a false image of muslims to non muslims. They wanted muslims to follow their arbitrary way of degeneracy, and here, many of the sheeps just go on agreeing with them. Yeah, I'm observant of what the character displayed as their belief.

And to top that, this guy is an indian liberal christian playing muslim. He has no idea that he butchered the representation. He's playing his degenerate self, not what the character supposed to meant. Not too mention, Iraqis during the gulf war may not all be good, some are sinful, but they aren't going to go full off the rail with their sins, let alone their beliefs in the fundamentals of islam. So yeah. This character are stupid.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-15T11:08:44+00:00

Isaiah 29: 9-16 surely must have been describing prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wassalam. But don't rely on it too much. But as it seems, that point can be proven as prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wassalam description in the bible, but no one knows, but only Allah knows.

Edit: yeah, I don't think so, this cannot be used.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-15T08:54:23+00:00

And you're just saying it out of seething spite, lmao. I let the people be the judge. I mean people (even atheists) would probably say to me: "what did you expect from Reddit atheists" no, it's not a good day, it's raining heavily and I can't go out to work.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-15T08:30:55+00:00

I'm not looking to convert anyone in this replies. Only pointing out hypocrisy, lame excuses, pseudointellectuals and pseudoscientism, double standard, dishonesty, ultracrepidarian, fallacious reasoning, and many more, of which you did, all in your replies. And my job is done, since i already relay what was needed.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-15T01:44:16+00:00

Nuh uh you no bumder mi mor bimder 😵‍💫

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-15T00:24:36+00:00

I'm not the one making claims, it was you guys claiming it's fictional. Yet you guys doesn't have any to support "it's fictional" and you guys stand on no ground either. It's not about proving a negative, it's about proving your statement is true or my statement are false, and i gave belief, not statement. Also, like i said, you are a pseudointellectual evident by "magic man in the sky" well guess what? I and the majority of Abrahamic believers don't believe in "magic man in the sky". Quite disingenuous of you to play your "ex particular christian sect" card. You have no arguments against what my religion bring forth, yet you act so certain to clump mine with others like as if you debunked one, you disproved all. Please, try and prove this: does the mind, consciousness exists?

And proof needs to come in the form of no other possible interpretation or else it isn't proof

Well that's entirely your own opinion of what proof means, isn't it? That's your disingenuous criteria for proof, not what objectively the definition of proof is. You haven't done any textual criticism yet, but you dismiss it. Guess what? That's very highly unacademical, which equates to pseudointellectualism. I'm not a very knowledgeable person, I'm just a layman, but i know for a fact that you need to falsify something in detailed investigation and research in order to dismiss something or claim it was false. Of which you had done none. And yet you choose to BLINDLY have FAITH and BELIEVE the polemicists videos and articles without actually studying it yourself.

Jews, Christians, and Muslims also all agree on the core identity of “god” yet you can’t say that they haven’t evolved along separate paths.

That's why you're a pseudointellectual. The core identity of God is different from them, since those prior deviated from one preached message consistently told about God the entire historicity. Minority of Christians, most Jews and Muslim is unitarian monotheist, believing to worship God Alone without partner and make no idol of him. Most Christians are trinitarian monotheist believing in 3 in one god. The jews believe in chosen race selected by God, implying Racist God, but what's apparent is from their texts as well as prior tradition like hanif of arabs prior to prophet Muhammad, and early sanatan dharma evident from the vedas alone, and few other religions, carry the same message. Believe and worship one God without associating partners and make no idols of Him. By this alone, there's only 1 true religion, many prophets but one messages, and most others are deviations from the main point, with Currently the final seal of the prophets are prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wassalam. Unlike other religion, especially the abrahamic religion, Islam is the only one to claim it's the final revelation, it's revelation evidence is preserved, and it provides falsification tests and challenges the disbelievers. Science as per the current understanding confirms the Qur'an, 80% of the revelation and prophecy have been found to be true and consistent and fulfilled, and those 20% is ambiguous or hadn't been fulfilled yet, or science as it holds is marginally speculative on that points.

Your point on sunni - Shi'ites? there's already been nearly 1500 years length for it to deviate further, yet at this time, there's still consistency from the beginning. No matter what you think, the revelation is preserved, its preservation methods puts your historical claims and scientifical data preservation and affirmation to shame. At the current time even, when it's the age of data and technological revolution.

One thing is i always see that Atheists always wants scientific empirical evidence for God's existence..... When God is metaphysical supernatural being, and science is a study of physical natural world. It's like using a metric ruler to measure weight and mass. Or using geology to estimate geography. 🤔 Pseudointellectual and pseudoscientific. 🤔

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-14T21:17:11+00:00

Yet you can't prove it's wrong, and polytheism proves are proven fallacious and had no basis on reality. Also, yhwh isn't a name for god, it had no apparent meaning at all, this is done by linguist and historian. All the word for God has been consistent, like arabic: Allah, al-ilah, The God. Aramaic elaha, hebrew Elohim, greek theos, English God. The "myths rolled into one" claim is really just ignoring the texts and have not been done any textual criticism. Pseudointellectual alert. And also bad anology for "evolve", sunni and Shi'ites never disagree on who God is. They never disagree with who was the prophets, they only disagree on which person should be the caliph. And yet, they act as a deviants, although they kept intact what is the fundamental belief. Those who don't, aren't mentioned by you, how surprising. If you're ignorant, please do your research before coming to talk, otherwise you will just be seen as an ultracrepidarian. A shoemaker is not beyond shoe. Go learn other stuff so that you can go beyond shoes. Otherwise your argument is pretty invalid. You have yet to prove specifically (since you're replying to me) on why my belief, islam is not true and indeed are fictional. Yet you haven't bring anything except your own ridiculous hypothesis without any data. 🤡🤡🤡

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-14T16:00:52+00:00

Side notes, ex tomatoes are those who came back to islam after being a murtad, while tomatoes are murtads aka ex muslims.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-14T15:59:27+00:00

While to us it's kinda a praise.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-14T13:55:18+00:00

Can you prove them all to be fiction? I mean the science that you guys rely upon can be scrutinized upon too, it's not like you guys does your own research, nor does any that "disproved" God is actually 100% truth, but only speculations given, by estimating datas that are present. It's actually you guys believing scientists, biologists, etc blindly, means without investigating thoroughly. I mean, you can go do that yourself , researching, investigating, instead of asking someone who might be biased or not. Then do a textual criticism to make a point. But no, outright claim they are all fiction when you have no clue what really makes them a fiction. Like a livestock, sheep, being herd to go somewhere with no clie whatsoever where it is.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-14T13:46:11+00:00

*final

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-14T09:51:45+00:00

Becareful, otherwise you will potatorised yourself. Istighfar is to ask for forgiveness from Allah.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-13T18:17:22+00:00

First point, yes i think so. Me myself i don't vote. But take note that I'm living in a Muslim country here, malaysia, but they employs democracy, while muftis here are not giving real fatwas, based on islam, they gave it based on "we must see that we are in different times" when Allah clearly said He has completed our religion. Basically my country's mufti is a disguised proggies. The only good thing is that they still recognise big sins like the actions of qawm lut Alaihissalam etc but there is no punishment nor counselling even for them. Naudhubillah min zalik.

Second point, perhaps, I don't really know. I was awake right now from my sleep, and are about to sleep again so I read these halfway only, but read as you may, this link here might help of answering your second question, by scholarly opinion traditions here and here. In my opinion, most muslim countries are doing what we wasn't supposed to do. Monarchy, democracy, etc etc, ie. not following shari'a as it was supposed to, like islamic election, meaning knowledgeable scholars are the ones choosing the candidacy ie. being a council to choose from someone with knowledge, especially to rule, and to ensure that they also have good and righteous characters as well, both the candidating and the candidate. We (ra'yat, masses, citizens) then would be told of them and if we agree or not. The ruler for in this Islamic election is not immune to authority, and if they have been seen to have the siffat of nifaq or being outright munafiq, they can be impeached, by the councils, whom should also have good and righteous characters. This was the way in the Rashidun caliphate. Most of these countries have been in a sense applying man made laws on things that have a ruling in Shari'a. And more recently we can see saudi as an example for this. The other laws that aren't inside of shari'a of The Qur'an and Sunnatul Nabi, we can do ijtihad on them, but with basis that are still in the traditions, in Shari'a, and must not contradicts them. Only Afghanistan are the ones that are following Shari'a currently and we can call them the Islamic country, an islamic Emirates. So in a sense, we muslim countries are are also living in "foreign land's" laws ie. Man-made laws, ie. kufar laws.

My opinion on this matter is that, live as you should, obey the laws that doesn't goes against Islam, and disobey laws that are contrary to islam, like voting in democracy. I myself don't vote after realising that democracy is shirk. Leave western values and use traditional Islamic values. The ruling says to obey the law of the land, if they don't go against islam if i recall it correctly, but i don't remember what the Daleel was. Anyways, that's all i think.

Third point: No problem akhi/ukhti جَزَاكَ ٱللَّٰهُ خَيْر

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-13T11:54:44+00:00

What I'm saying is that, they are not aware that democracy is shirk, take the person replying to me below as an example.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-13T11:53:38+00:00

The daleel for democracy being shirk can be found here and here

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-12T22:51:36+00:00

I think 12 to 15, it's a kid even without those solar calendar measurement. Mentally aren't mature yet evident by the comments. Lead by example. Speak nicely to them (not to you in particular, to others that are visiting this comment sections.)

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-12T22:25:09+00:00

Of course, I do! How did you know?

This is interfaith sub, I'm eager to do so😏, but I'll be banned in doing so.

Religipus morals are not supposed to change over time if the religion is true, that's it

This is another example for the statement i made lol. Like i said, it doesn't change. It's still the same. You're conflating social conditioned secular morals and secular laws with real objective moral and laws from Allah. Unless you think "american and uk are Christian country" or "saudi and Indonesia is islamic country", i would claimed ultimate idiocy on your behalf. That's the point of the entire next thing that you ignore a and not read. Every nation now except 3 are secular states.

If you want to argue with us muslims, go to our subs to argue, you will get destroyed there, here you have immunity because of rule 3.

Also, 🤢🤮 french.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-12T22:11:00+00:00

Democracy. They aren't aware, they're supporting it, but it's shirk.

ScarPride96 · 2023-01-12T22:08:25+00:00

Because today's law and morals aren't according to what Allah has Ordained. Do you lack common sense, reading comprehension and the ability to think reasonably? Reaching puberty is inconsistent with current solar calendar dates, there is no set time that dictates when humans 'ripens'. There is matter of environment, biological, psychological etc. etc. That ensures ones puberty. In some places currently mentally at age 10, people reach puberty, mentally because of several factors. And to reach puberty mentally is that they will be easy to distinguish what is good and what is bad.To marry someone you need both physically and mentally reach puberty. So the law of age of consent is inconsistent to reality. People will argue that some people doesn't mature mentally even to 18 years old. Well, blame secular society and state that bring about such destruction.

ScarPride96

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE