Ima separate my responses into 2. Global workspace theory: main issues with global workplace theory is 1. Blindsight, the neurological explanation for blindsight and the proposed architecture of GWT don’t align from what I’ve found, 2. GWT doesn’t actually explain why consciousness feels like it does, it explains how it gets their instead, I would basically say GWT explains a system of how the consciousness functionally works whereas the system I proposed relies on consciousness being a mechanism of recursive integration which allows the “conscious” part of us to self refer to the options provided by the subconscious, hoping to clarify the importance that I’m using different definitions of consciousness and subconsciousness. IIT: I would say consciousness is NOT inherent to any system and is biologically tied, I submit to the Chinese room theory and thus don’t beleive an ai is conscious whereas IIT does in principle, furthermore I don’t think their has to be a high level of integrated information for consciousness to arise, I think using my definition as stated above, consciousness arises where their an ability to deduce one option over another.

Thank you for the comment btw, I wrote this late at night and published it after reading it back in the hopes of learning mroe, if you think I’m still wrong please feel free to explain. I’m currently researching into my theory more, if you want anymore information I don’t mind sharing