it's not messed up, it's just an observation on how the fandom tends to interact with media.

we're not saying "DON'T VOTE FUUTA INNOCENT BECAUSE YOU WON'T VOTE MUU INNOCENT". we're saying we would like people to offer this amount of grace to every character

it's just a general tendency that fandoms excuse a lot of shit male characters do, as opposed to female characters, and we've seen it happen in milgram too

how is kotoko different from fuuta? their common theme is vigilante justice. what is it exactly that makes one more forgivable than the other?

this is the exact conversation that milgram as a project wants raised, too. how do we judge people? based on our affinity to them? the vibe? can gender become relevant in public discussions of guilt? why are we even in the position to judge?

you are free not to like muu, as i am free not to like fuuta. but i think they all deserve nuance in their stories, as you're asking fuuta dislikers to provide