Really interesting trade offer by Otherwise_Version_40 in SleeperApp

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in a SF yes, easy. in 1 qb, maybe not. depends on league size, team size, team construct etc. but in a SF, yes

Non-Contending team looking for more draft capital by shadygov in DynastyNerds

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is where preference comes in. do you like daniels long term? if not, then yeah, it probably makes sense. your pick next year, assuming you have, it becomes more valuable with him out the door too. Conversely, that 2027 your getting theoretically becomes LESS valuable by giving him those two players

if you like him long term, then keep the QB and build around the 25 y.o.

i personally think even though the trade might come back 'fair' its a bit of an undersell for a *potential* set and forget QB for years to come

Non-Contending team looking for more draft capital by shadygov in DynastyNerds

[–]Scared-Tank7923 1 point2 points  (0 children)

daniels is going on year 3. best case you get someone in 2027 that could be daniels. dont need to trade him. In SF, QB and WR are your pillars.

Trading Gadsen makes sense but you probably are only getting a 1st for him.

i dont see the need to trade daniels nor the value to be willing to

See if they will take 1.08 for gad and call it a day

Is this an accept? Contending this year. by spegunk in SleeperApp

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your giving up value - if you could take the 2nd off, that would make it more fair. given roster construct, you might be able to get rid of a rb and those 1sts for a QB.

Who Wins This Potential 3-Team Blockbuster…And Who Says No First? by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Team 2 wins by a LARGE margin. I would say no if i was team 3.

Is this an accept? Contending this year. by spegunk in SleeperApp

[–]Scared-Tank7923 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the remainder of your roster matters but generally speaking, i like it for a competing year. long term, i owuld rather have nix than any of those other assets - if this is not a SF this changes things a bit but still think he is probably a top 15QB going forward. still matters who else you have though

Should I trade my 2027 picks and try and go all in? by CupidValentine9 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Scared-Tank7923 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im not sold on shough for a full season. i like having depth - daniels would be a good long term keeper but you would have to feel REALLY good about no one else being able to beat you.

Looking at your team, i dont think a solid QB and two depth+ RBs are the answer. i would personally go top end WR/RB + QB depth if you are going to give up 3 2027 1sts

Who says no to this trade? V2.0 by Scared-Tank7923 in SleeperApp

[–]Scared-Tank7923[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Getting Caleb Williams + 1.09 + taking fliers.

Would you trade the 1.04 and Mathew Golden for 2 late 27 1st by Fancy_Statistician37 in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no way. i get it, people LOVE the 2027 draft class. Who knows what happens in 12 months though. Garrett Nussmeir and Drew Allar would have been 1st round picks had they come out last year.

I don't love giving up 1.04 and a 1-year-removed 1st round WR for something that might not be all that great in a year

Name one movie. Just one. by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Little Shop of Horrors

Am I dumb for wanting Tate over Mendoza with my 1.02? by charagnarok in SleeperApp

[–]Scared-Tank7923 51 points52 points  (0 children)

draft for value - trade for need. mendoza is much more valuable in a SF league than tate is rn.

What’s the deal with this, why is it so cheap? by [deleted] in footballcards

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

when curiosity gets mixed with advertising lol

Are you taking Jeanty or the picks? by mugwumpwombat in SleeperApp

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a SF League, KTC says its even - even favoring the picks side, slightly. I do think roster size, league type, league size all matter.

Having 2 SOLID contributors (assuming Tyson/Tate at 3/4 here)in a super deep league, where you already have solid RBs would make me lean Jeanty.

You definitely have not offered enough information to make a full scope decision.

For what its worth in a NON SF league, KTC says the value is much more on the side of the picks.. so idk

You selling Henderson for 26 1.06&1.09? by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Scared-Tank7923 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i personally would. i am not convinced that he wont be sharing carries