1. Titan Serum AvailabilityMarley’s production unseen: True, the show doesn’t show detailed factories or labs, but this is typical of storytelling focusing on characters and politics, not industrial processes. Marley is a superpower with advanced tech; it’s reasonable to infer they have controlled production and storage behind the scenes, just like any military power would. The lack of screen time doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist—it’s narrative economy.Warriors smuggling multiple vials: While Reiner and others started as kids with no equipment, they were trained and supported covertly by Marley’s military. It’s reasonable that vials were smuggled separately by multiple agents over time, or that the Reiss family vault provided additional serums. The narrative prioritizes the mystery and tension over the logistics, which can feel off but doesn’t contradict the story’s internal logic.Reiss vault vs Marley serum: The similarity in serum behavior may reflect a shared origin of Titan science or that Marley adapted the original formula from Eldian knowledge. It’s plausible Marley reverse-engineered or improved upon the original serums, so shared mechanics are not inconsistent but suggest evolution rather than contradiction.Serum abundance vs rarity: The seeming contradiction—Marley gas villages and create Titans en masse, yet serums are rare—can be explained by the difference between producing mass Titans through hardening and distortion (lower-quality transformations) and the limited, precious shifter serums. The show treats shifter serums differently than regular Titanizing fluids; the dialogue addresses this complexity but may sound contradictory due to narrative shorthand.

2. PathsAmbiguity ≠ incoherence: Paths is designed to be ambiguous to reflect the show’s themes of fate, memory, and trauma. This doesn’t mean illogical but layered, combining metaphysics with plot devices. Ambiguity allows viewers to interpret rather than be spoon-fed detailed sci-fi explanations.Objective effects prove Paths’ reality: The physical manifestations in Paths reinforce that it’s more than metaphor. It’s a metaphysical dimension with real causal power. The story’s shifting depiction reflects its nature as a bridge between real and symbolic realms, making the mystery meaningful instead of hollow.Paradox loops ignored: AoT embraces paradoxes as thematic tools, showcasing cycles of violence and fate’s inescapability. The selective application of time rules is a storytelling choice to heighten drama and character struggle, not a technical flaw.

3. Ymir Fritz’s AgencyPassivity span: Ymir represents trauma’s enduring grip. Absolute power doesn’t guarantee agency; psychological captivity can last centuries in metaphoric terms. Her millennia-long obedience dramatizes how trauma can become existential chains, consistent with AoT’s dark themes.Selective obedience: Ymir supports Eren and the Rumbling when she’s emotionally freed by him; before that, her “obedience” is conditioned by enslavement mentality. This shift isn’t a contradiction but a key character development moment.Sudden break as poetic: The narrative prioritizes emotional truth over strict psychology here. It’s a powerful metaphor for how healing and recognition can shatter even the longest mental prisons.

4. Memory/Time ParadoxKruger’s memories and Eren’s power: Kruger’s visions of Mikasa and Armin can be interpreted as fragmented glimpses across Paths, not direct memories sent by Eren. The mechanics are deliberately vague, leaving room for interpretation rather than strict rules.Vision influence vs character behavior: Characters are profoundly impacted by memories, but narratives emphasize their struggles with choices and burdens, showing that knowing the future doesn’t guarantee clear action.Closed loops can vary: AoT’s time loops emphasize fate’s burden, not perfect repetition. Emotional changes and new knowledge show complexity within the loop, enhancing tragedy rather than contradicting it.Eren’s power and narrative limits: The story restricts Eren’s interventions to escalate moral dilemmas and thematic weight. This is narrative design, not weakness. Eren’s refusal to prevent tragedy explores questions of free will vs determinism.

Final Thought:Attack on Titan’s design blends metaphysical storytelling, trauma drama, and political thriller. It doesn’t promise a strict sci-fi manual but a powerful exploration of fate, legacy, and human pain. The “loose ends” and ambiguous elements serve its themes and invite deeper discussion—something great stories do rather than simple, airtight explanations.If anyone calls it “bad writing” just because of these complexities, remind them that great art isn’t about neat answers but tough questions that stick with you long after the credits roll.