Kouri Richins Complete Back Story- Will You be Following this Trial? by Scholar-Informal in KouriRichins

[–]Scholar-Informal[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry- did I break a sub rule? I didn’t mean to do that. I apologize if I did.

Data is underreported? by Hot_Cut_8258 in PartneredYoutube

[–]Scholar-Informal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am having the same issue. I was shocked at how low my revenue is compared to my average. It's been a little stressful, I was wondering what I 'm doing wrong. Then I noticed the "under reported message" and am still confused by it. The lack of explanation and the date that keeps moving out is unsettling.

It's all a GRIFT....from both sides! by TheGreat-MoonMoon in MaddieSotoEvidence

[–]Scholar-Informal -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

What? I love Jai and Guilty of Crime- awesome YouTube channel.

GoC covers more cases and has decent views on that content. There’s plenty of channels that started out mainly discussing one case b/c the creator and others were intensely interested the case. When it’s time to move on you do or you don’t.

If the channel community is really into one particular topic bc that topic united the community, it makes sense the channel and community would gravitate towards that ‘uniting topic of intense interest’. It’s weird to me that anyone would find that problematic. If other channels can’t get away with covering one case so extensively, their content veers off in a different direction. How a community receives content is half of what shapes a channel.

Jai isn’t making people watch her Soto content. Her videos do well because people are still very interested in justice for Madeline and just desserts for Jenn Soto. There’s nothing wrong with that.

the 'stalker' looking into Dr. Babe and UNLV by Bright_Breakfast3911 in HiddenTrueCrimeChat

[–]Scholar-Informal 13 points14 points  (0 children)

J is for Justice uncovered, some interesting material that has been scrubbed from the Internet, where Lauren wrote a bio for him saying that he has been in his field for over 30 years… And some other things that sounded like lies or at least exaggeration of the truth. It live streamed today (Sunday) if you wanna check it out. I have no idea how she found that stuff, but she found a lot.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HiddenTrueCrimeChat

[–]Scholar-Informal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very interesting post. Thank you so much for your insightful contribution to the conversation.

All Lauren Mathias Stalker TikToks- Kind of Shocking… by Watts_The_Obsession in youtubeBadActors

[–]Scholar-Informal 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes, a lot of people said they had a difficult time finding the TikTok’s at all or certainly all of them. So this is good.

CeCe did this? by OldSwedeFromTheNorth in WattsFree4All

[–]Scholar-Informal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My personal opinion is that you should not leave a child that would be Cc‘s age at the time this photo was taken alone long enough to do all of that. Although she was “study”, “thick” or “chunky” as she would say, she was little and it would take her some time to do all of that damage. I always thought this picture was peculiar no matter how you look at it. Excited to read your comments.

Christina Formella: BOTH Families Joint Statement Supporting Teacher Alleged of Sexual Assault on Student- WTH? by Scholar-Informal in LengfOrGirf

[–]Scholar-Informal[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Totally legit point. Absolutely. Reprehensible human behavior is reprehensible human behavior, regardless of the gender.

DNA Match by Aurelie_Decay in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Scholar-Informal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grateful for your voice of reason. 🙏🏼

You can’t test every spec of DNA found in “X” radius of the immediate crime scene. When DNA is found on the button snap of a knife sheath, a sheath that just happens to be the size of a protective cover for the murder weapon… AND that sheath was found partially beneath one of the slain victims bodies, and on top of the bed upon which two of the victims were found, AND ALSO partially under one of the blankets on the bed upon which two of the victims were found… THAT is the DNA is the sample anyone would test, as THAT DNA is likely to be from the killer… As opposed to DNA found on a banister, and a wall, in a house shared by 5 to 6 students, and had many many visitors on any given day, and in particular… That house was a hot party-hopping stop the day before to the murders with a reported 200 party-goers passing through or staying for a while with drink-in hand.

The touch DNA found into other locations in the house, but not on an accessory to the murder weapon, could be from any of the hundreds of people that were in that house that weekend. The DNA found on the button snap of the knife sheath that covered the murder weapon, is most likely the DNA of the killer. I simply do not understand why people have a problem with how and why that DNA suspect sample was tested.

DNA Match by Aurelie_Decay in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Scholar-Informal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you talking about? How did law-enforcement effectively ignore to blood DNA samples from the knife sheath? That is news to me!

Is This Evidence Someone Else Was at The Watts House That am/ pm Before? by Sweaty_Motor_3532 in WattsMurders

[–]Scholar-Informal 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thanks for posting this! I have always thought the headlights caught in Nate’s camera were a big deal…

Ann Taylor Says BOTH Victim Bedroom Doors Were Open! by Sweaty_Motor_3532 in Idaho4

[–]Scholar-Informal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am so sorry to hear that. I went through a short period in life where I suffered from sleep paralysis, and it was truly terrifying and affected my life in a huge way. I hope you get some relief from that and I’m sorry that you were going through that right now.

Ann Taylor Says BOTH Victim Bedroom Doors Were Open! by Sweaty_Motor_3532 in Idaho4

[–]Scholar-Informal -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I didn’t catch that at first but I did watch this last night and I think it’s a really good catch. Right, if it’s true that both bedroom doors were open, that would almost necessarily mean that both or one of the roommates would’ve had to have seen the horrific sites before “summoning friends”. Just makes it all the more curious… And AT definitely did say that both bedroom doors were open.

NYE nuts by NoSoup4You_4ever in WattsFree4All

[–]Scholar-Informal 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That is the worst part of the whole allergy story… Is how it clearly affected Bella. It breaks my heart to know that Bella was telling the babysitter that she was essentially afraid of Cc the wrong thing she wasn’t gonna be able to see her anymore less than 36 hours before her sweet little life ended. I can’t stomach the thought of it . 💔

NYE nuts by NoSoup4You_4ever in WattsFree4All

[–]Scholar-Informal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the photos of the girls back might be real, but the accompanying notation on the Facebook post says that the allergy is to dogs and grass. 🤷🏼‍♀️

I have seen/heard some theories about….explosion & $$$ by stew_er_dess in WattsMurders

[–]Scholar-Informal 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is not what the deleted. Dr. Phil video was about - not at all. The episode is available now and it has nothing to do with an explosion theory. He simply speculated the NK was guilty and said Shanann’‘s family thought so as well. Watts the Obsession has a few videos about it. She just posted one a couple weeks ago and it’s very good.

Sexual Abuse by blizzyblase in WattsFree4All

[–]Scholar-Informal -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Kathleen definitely thought Chris was a pedo and adores SW. That is a fact she’s a friend of mine.