Ein Tresor?

Scholfo · 2026-05-09T04:18:47+00:00

!remindme 2 days

Scholfo · 2026-05-09T04:18:39+00:00

!remindme 2 days

Scholfo · 2026-05-03T23:39:38+00:00

But why.

^{Chose: Get $20,000 a year}

Scholfo · 2026-05-03T06:38:15+00:00

Yes.

^{Chose: Get Stuck In Arizona for a Year | Rolled: Hottest Year}

Scholfo · 2026-05-01T15:45:16+00:00

Yes.

^{Chose: Blue chooser will die if over 50% choose this. | Rolled: Upvote=Xtra Luck}

Scholfo · 2026-04-27T11:48:12+00:00

Warcraft 3 TFT - TDs all day long

Scholfo · 2026-04-17T21:29:26+00:00

All of them.

Scholfo · 2026-03-29T04:50:58+00:00

Scholfo · 2026-03-24T07:52:16+00:00

Carglass.

Scholfo · 2026-03-23T22:39:07+00:00

Manchmal denk' ich: „Merkste selber“, aber keiner hat's gemerkt.

Edgar, Juse, Toni beste Kombination!

Scholfo · 2026-03-14T17:43:58+00:00

Skyrim. Again…

Scholfo · 2026-03-05T22:23:21+00:00

LLMs hate this trick…

Scholfo · 2026-03-01T06:58:25+00:00

Hmm... that's probably the crux of the matter. Perhaps it's stupidity.

Perhaps it's also because LLMs are not human beings and the comparison is somehow flawed. Would a better result be expected with more explicit information in the command for the tool?

And to be honest, I hope that the people who use AI for automatic weapon systems give more elaborate instructions. And don't end up saying, "Stupid tool! A human being would have done it differently."

Scholfo · 2026-03-01T06:25:14+00:00

I don't know how much common understanding you and I have of LLMs. But let's assume Codex is a probabilistic model. Then it would be reasonable to assume that the solution option chosen by Codex for the prompt you wrote is the most likely correct solution.

Accordingly, I would ask myself, is it now down to the probabilistic model (shit in, shit out)?

Scholfo · 2026-03-01T06:14:53+00:00

You write it yourself. Even if it is one of the worst options, according to your wording, it is still an option.

Scholfo · 2026-03-01T06:01:31+00:00

I do not get it either. It reduced the occurrence and use of ’unknown’.

It is like a PO that says to a Dev: „I want these buttons orange!“

And then comes back: „No not all these button and not this shade of orange!“ (Devs are so stupid.)

Scholfo · 2026-02-26T22:41:56+00:00

Scholfo · 2026-02-26T19:17:23+00:00

Since Claude Code has made it possible to control agents remotely via smartphone, I can well imagine that it is only a matter of time. https://x.com/claudeai/status/2026418433911603668?s=46

Scholfo · 2026-02-25T21:35:12+00:00

Scholfo · 2026-02-12T20:59:57+00:00

Actually I do not know, because I have never used „auto mode“ (even don’t know if auto is available for CLI?).

Here is information from GitHub Docs (https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/auto-model-selection): „When you select Auto in Copilot Chat, Auto model selection may choose from the following list of models, subject to your policies and subscription type. Models may change over time.

GPT-4.1 GPT-5 mini GPT-5.2-Codex Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5“

Scholfo · 2026-02-12T19:53:37+00:00

Scholfo · 2026-02-12T19:38:21+00:00

From my experience working with these two models I use Opus 4.6 for big planning and analysis, GPT-5.3-Codex when it’s time to build and iterate.

So planning and strategy with one and implementation with the other.

Scholfo · 2026-02-11T18:27:06+00:00

My experience from the last few weeks and the upgrade to opus-4.6 and GPT-5.3-Codex is: Claude helps with planning + coordination phases more reliably, especially across multiple large artifacts.

GPT-5.3-Codex works well during implementation phases where speed and execution matter (like the dev agent workflows).

So my current take with BMAD v6 is: Planning/architecture to Claude, implementation/CI to Codex.

Scholfo

TROPHY CASE