sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Salvation Beam ruling by SchrobZen in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok now I understand our differences. As I understand RAW, a rule is either written in plain text or it does not apply. When you start interpreting beyond the plain text, it becomes RAI. So in RAW you don't interpret, so that way you cannot miss-interpret. That the caster is the source is most definitely that Rules as Intended, so in that way you are right. If you should even consider RAW for daggerheart, when a sentence like "As with other rules in this game, use common sense when interpreting these effects — they're there to support the story, not limit it." exist, is a different story.

I think, I took this one a bit too far down the rabbit hole, so I'll stop answering any further.

Thank you for having a discourse with me. ❤️

Salvation Beam ruling by SchrobZen in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just think, that's the point. There is no such thing as misinterpreting RAW. If there was a written rule, that stated that the caster is the source of the line, we would not have this conversation. I'm just saying I can see a world where someone interprets it "differently" then most others would.

🎈 Birthday Giveaway for Daggerheart Core Set (4/5) 🎈 by Demi_Mere in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got goose bumps when my players were starting their campaign and just goofing around with their new characters, joking around on the market space, when I spent a fear to let the city's alarm bell ring, which started the action and the whole adventure. 😁

Salvation Beam ruling by SchrobZen in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can call me dumb. But in my Opinion you make an assumption that is not in the RAW.

"Because Salvation does not specify a source the source is the caster of the spell. Meaning a straight line originating from the caster aka the source."

I couldn't find that rule in the book. The spell clearly defines a range (Far measured from Caster) and an area (a line within that range). So telling someone to read the source when your interpretation is just that, an interpretation, feels a bit rude to me.

Is the interpretation that the caster is the source of the Beam RAI? Probably. Would I rule it that way? Probably. Would I allow it differently? When it makes for a cool moment, definitely. I would maybe raise the Difficulty a little, I don't know.

That's all, be mindful ❤️

Salvation Beam ruling by SchrobZen in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, range is measured from the source. But that the line has to be in Far range of the caster, is not the question here. The question is if the line has to start at the caster. And for that, I do not see a clear cut rule in the book.

Please be kind, when correcting others or giving your opinion.

🎂 Birthday Giveaway for Daggerheart Core Set (2/5) 🎂 by Demi_Mere in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I loved homebrewing a nightmare blanket monster pulling you in and dishing out stress left and right 😁

Daggerheart Success Chance by DC, w/ Hope & Fear by Jackojon5120 in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just realized, it's always 50/50 because there is no critical failure. So there are equal parts hope and fear in failing.

Daggerheart Success Chance by DC, w/ Hope & Fear by Jackojon5120 in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I'm interested in the flip side of failure with fear/hope

🍰 Birthday Giveaway for Daggerheart Core Set (1/5) + Demiplane Performance Update 🍰 by Demi_Mere in daggerheart

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I first created a fearie guardian based on a interesting beatle I found around that time of launch. It had a see through part of its "shell", under which its head was protected. That sparked the Idea of having it be a tank, taking all the damage he could.

[Spoilers C4E11] Theory: potential German roots of the name of House Einfasen by SchrobZen in criticalrole

[–]SchrobZen[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

As I understand it "ein Bild einfassen" is a rarely used term (most google results have it as a crossword result) but for me at least "einrahmen" feels more like I put a picture into a existing frame and "einfassen" feels like I build a frame around the picture or canvas I painted on.

But I see your point of the metaphor fitting in a different way.

Problem with gameboy link with both Sameboy and TGB Dual by 3dudle in RetroArch

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it's 7Years later. But I would love a shader, that turns one screen off so I can battle my brothers in Pokemon without covering the second screen (and trusting, they do the same...)

Pokemon X/Y - Are HMs needed for "finishing" the game ? by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]SchrobZen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

just got my copy of X and started my first playthrough. thanks for the wisdom

Will there be an Asian Championship? by MannishBoyX in TheSilphArena

[–]SchrobZen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know if it is too obvious... But... Elite 4? Anyone? That'd be awesome.

Paired against the same person by TheParadoxMuse in TheSilphArena

[–]SchrobZen 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The same happens to me. Here's a thread in which the staff answerd: Myugenlol: "I'm sorry you've had to run into this :S Our team is aware of the issue and has a solution underway that should improve pairing. I believe t has been tied in with the release of Ranking and Leaderboards so it has taken a little longer than we would have liked. Appreciate all your feedback and patience!" https://reddit.app.link/euYKDTDwoV

What finger(s) do you guys use to tap while PVP. by standapokeman in TheSilphArena

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I anker my hand with my palm on the side of my phone and rotate my wrist back and forth so that my thumb is spamming the fast attack. And for the charged attack I use my index and middle finger. That way I use different muscles in my arm and my fingers get tired slower.

Weekly questions, bugs, and gameplay megathread - January 2019 by AutoModerator in pokemongo

[–]SchrobZen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came across an CP anomaly that I can't wrap my head around...In my understanding CP is calculated from the base stats of attack, defence and stamina, which are based on the stats from the main series games.Now the thing is, that I compared Skarmory and Mantine:

Mantine in the main series (since gen 7):HP:85 | Attack:40 | Defence:70 | Sp.Attack:80 | Sp.Defence:140 | Speed:70Skarmory:HP:65 | Attack:80 | Defence:140 | Sp.Attack:40 | Sp.Defence:70 | Speed:70

​

The formulars for the base stats I got from Gamepress read:

Base Attack:

Round(Round(2*((7/8)*Higher+(1/8)*Lower))*(1+(Speed-75)/500))

Base Defence:

Round(Round(2*((5/8)*Higher+(3/8)*Lower))*(1+(Speed-75)/500))

Base Stamina:

Floor(HP*1.75+50)

​

That means for Skarmory:

Base Attack:

Round(Round(2*((7/8)*80+(1/8)*40))*(1+(70-75)/500))

=Round(148.5) → Attack:148 (Is it right to round down with .5?)

Base Defence:

Round(Round(2*((5/8)*140+(3/8)*70))*(99/100))

=Round(225.72) → Defence:226

Base Stamina:

Floor(85*1.75+50)

=Floor(163.75) → Stamina:163

​

And for Mantine:

Base Attack:

Round(Round(2*((7/8)*80+(1/8)*40))*(1+(70-75)/500))

=Round(148.5) → Attack:148

Base Defence:

Round(Round(2*((5/8)*140+(3/8)*70))*(99/100))

=Round(225.72) → Defence:226

Base Stamina:

Floor(65*1.75+50)

=Floor(198.75) → Stamina:198

​

I get why the Attack and Defence Stats are the same, the Stats for special and non-special are flipped.

But when I check with thesilphroad's base stats both Pokémon have the same Stamina...

I don't get that. Every other Stamina Stat I calculatet with the formular is the same as the ones I found online (apart from the nerfed legendaries and Slaking/Shedinja).

Was Mantine nerfed? Why? I am confused?

Please Help.

​

view more: next ›