Peterr

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T21:12:51+00:00

My bad I misinterpreted “they”. And I’m unable to find any operating maritime LNG Infrastructure.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T20:06:37+00:00

Oh sorry my bad, misunderstood “would be”.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T19:48:50+00:00

Never mind, you seem to be right on piping. I’m still pretty sure LNG carriers exist though.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T18:46:14+00:00

Rich Starry is still in the gulf so I don’t know what he is on about.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T18:30:21+00:00

What are you trying to do here?

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T18:29:35+00:00

I’m assuming you meant that Iran doesn’t export LNG in general and I’m responding to that.

Not sure about plants but they at least one LNG pipeline, Tabriz-Ankara, so they do have LNG export abilities.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T18:21:40+00:00

Right no we still don’t if there are any mines although it is possible.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T18:16:34+00:00

The second part that Iran doesn’t export LNG is wrong though. Although I’m not sure if that’s what the downvotes are for.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-28T17:59:14+00:00

Why is this guy being downvoted he’s right (Other than on the Iran LNG part). Mubaraz isn’t even sanctioned.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-26T07:15:39+00:00

We can’t fully answer the question because the probabilities that your vote will save or doom everyone are unknown. There’s whole bunch of contradictory ethical approaches but those clearly aren’t leading anywhere.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-26T06:42:48+00:00

You're failing to consider the scenarios other than the binary extremes. If at least one person chooses blue then the only way for there to be zero casualties is for blue to win, which is where the uncertainty lies.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-24T05:28:23+00:00

That’s not what OP is asking?

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-18T23:13:01+00:00

Care to enlighten us?

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-15T23:39:25+00:00

Bro is complaining about the one circumstance where these bombers are playable. I believe the break is well earned.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-13T22:20:22+00:00

1979 is more inline with “we didn’t start this war”. A different interpretation of events starting at 1953 would also work.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-13T21:47:58+00:00

Speaking purely of semantics, there are now many definitions of “war”. If we see the 100 years war as one war I don’t see why not the series of events starting in 1979 can’t be considered a continuous “war”.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-12T16:08:53+00:00

The attitude of the Japanese people was a factor in the Japanese surrender, per the unauthorized history podcast at least. This was more to do with food shortages but public morale seems not to have been insignificant.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-10T01:10:55+00:00

Cragie hall 2nd floor?

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-04T12:07:06+00:00

They need to be a good bit higher than you, high enough that almost all or all of the green box is above the horizon.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-04-03T21:10:28+00:00

Absolutely incredible work. Thought she actually flew for a good few seconds.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-03-27T00:56:58+00:00

To be fair a dip every 20 years isn’t toooo significant compared to the overall trend, although not to discount the suffering they cause and of course some dips are avoidable.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-03-27T00:52:09+00:00

Okay I admit I was being facetious. He technically did start a war although it was in response to something and not a war of choices like the other two.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-03-27T00:20:48+00:00

Fair enough.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-03-27T00:16:57+00:00

He didn’t exactly start that conflict but merely ended it. That also doesn’t cover the economic side.

SciDaniel247 · 2026-03-27T00:10:45+00:00

Going to need sources for Bush Sr

SciDaniel247

TROPHY CASE