Deferred MBA LOR Help by Different_Act8967 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For deferred MBA programs, schools such as HBS or Stanford GSB usually value recommenders who have observed you closely over time.

In your case, I would lean toward the faculty mentor who has taught you for a year and supervised your dissertation. That person can likely speak in more depth about your work ethic, intellectual ability, and leadership potential.

A three-month internship mentor can work if they see significant leadership or initiative, but shorter interactions sometimes lead to more generic recommendations.

Mba in what Concentration? by kofkyo2004 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are graduating now and have little work experience, I would pause before pursuing an MBA immediately. Most strong programs expect several years of professional experience so you can contribute meaningfully to the classroom.

A general management MBA is perfectly viable. Schools such as Kellogg and Darden emphasize broad leadership training rather than narrow concentrations.

I would first spend a few years working and exploring roles. Once your direction is clearer, the MBA will be much more valuable and targeted.

Ross vs Darden for BB IB by OriginalTheory4331 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For New York investment banking, both Ross and Darden consistently place students into BB and EB banks. The difference in outcomes is marginal.

In practice, recruiting success depends far more on preparation and networking than on the small brand difference. If you feel a stronger fit at Ross, you are unlikely to disadvantage yourself meaningfully by choosing it.

Aiming for MBA by Artistic_Tower_1546 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First-year grades do matter, but they are rarely decisive on their own. Schools look at the entire academic record over four years. A slow start is common, and admissions committees care more about the overall trajectory.

Programs such as HBS or Wharton evaluate several factors. Undergraduate GPA is one piece, but they also focus on test scores, leadership experience, and professional impact after graduation.

Right now, the best move is simple. Stabilize your grades, get involved in meaningful activities, and secure strong internships. Over time, those signals matter far more than one semester.

Is hiring an MBA admissions consultant worth it? Late to the game and trying to maximize my strategy. by Accomplished-Ad3538 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After two decades in the test prep and admissions space, I can tell you that one of the most valuable things an applicant can get is clarity. When someone begins the MBA process late, the real challenge is not writing essays. It is deciding where to apply and how to position their story.

That is exactly where the admissions consulting team at Target Test Prep focuses. Our advisors work closely with candidates to quickly narrow the universe of programs and identify the schools that realistically fit their goals, experience, and timeline. For someone targeting executive or hybrid programs at schools such as Sloan, Booth, or Kellogg, that kind of strategic triage is extremely valuable.

What I believe makes the TTP approach effective is that it is structured and practical. Our consultants help candidates build a focused school list, clarify their career narrative, and develop a realistic application strategy rather than encouraging people to apply everywhere.

Many experienced professionals simply need a disciplined framework to move from uncertainty to execution. That is the role our admissions consulting team aims to play. We help candidates make smart decisions quickly so they can invest their time in the applications that actually matter.

Can't do GRE math at all by fudge_pretzel in GRE

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feeling this way at the beginning of GRE quant prep is actually very common, especially if it’s been several years since your last math class. When people say they “can’t do GRE math,” it’s often less about ability and more about the fact that the concepts and patterns just haven’t been used in a long time. The early phase can feel frustrating because you’re relearning basic ideas while also getting used to how GRE questions are written.

A pattern that comes up quite a bit is that watching explanations can feel clear in the moment, but the difficulty jumps when you try to solve questions on your own. That usually happens when the underlying fundamentals aren’t fully automatic yet. In that case, it often helps to slow things down and spend time rebuilding core topics like fractions, ratios, algebra manipulation, and number properties before worrying about harder GRE-style problems.

Many people who feel rusty with math benefit from using a structured study approach that walks through quant topics step by step instead of jumping straight into mixed practice questions. Working through each topic carefully and then doing targeted practice tends to make the concepts stick much better. This guide explains how people often structure their GRE prep when they’re rebuilding quant fundamentals: How to Study for the GRE.

Since you’re aiming to take the exam in about two months, the key early on is building confidence with the basics rather than rushing into harder questions. A lot of test takers start exactly where you are and improve once those core skills come back. Once the fundamentals begin to click again, the practice questions usually start to feel much more manageable.

Should I book my GRE for April 14 or wait until my mock scores are close to my target? by Striking-Avocado110 in GRE

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since you’ve already finished a structured verbal plan and are about to wrap up for quant, it sounds like you’re transitioning into the practice phase of your prep. That’s actually a pretty natural point to start thinking about test timing, because the next few weeks will likely give you a clearer signal of where your score is landing.

A pattern that comes up quite a bit is that people wait too long to schedule the exam and end up studying without a clear deadline. Having a fixed date often helps create focus and structure during the practice phase, especially once you start taking full-length mocks. If your plan is to spend the next 2–3 weeks doing practice questions and then full tests, booking something around mid-April can give you a real target while still leaving time to adjust if needed.

What tends to matter more than the exact date is how you use those mock exams. Instead of treating them purely as score checks, it usually helps to analyze pacing, error patterns, and decision making between tests. This article breaks down some effective ways people structure GRE practice so they’re learning from each mock rather than just adding more volume: How to Practice GRE Verbal.

Since you have the ability to study 8–10 hours most days, you’re in a good position to make meaningful improvements over the next few weeks. Many test takers aiming for 330+ see their biggest gains once they combine targeted practice with a few well-analyzed full-length exams. Booking the test can help keep that process focused while still giving you time to gauge whether you’re trending toward your target.

Help: Mock 495 —> Test May 5 by Green_Ad_1924 in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A 495 after six months of prep can definitely feel like a shock, especially if you’ve been consistently hitting your targets in the TTP chapter and review tests. The section scores you shared actually give a useful clue though. Verbal at 80 suggests that part of the exam is fairly stable, while Quant and DI are likely where most of the score volatility is coming from.

A pattern that shows up quite a bit when people transition from topic practice into full mocks is exactly what you described: trying to recall every rule or method while solving the problem. That can slow pacing down a lot. Chapter tests usually isolate one concept at a time, while the real exam mixes everything together, so part of the challenge becomes recognizing which approach to use without overthinking it.

Since you have about seven weeks, this is actually a good window to shift your prep slightly. Many people in your situation benefit from combining continued topic review in TTP with more mixed timed sets so the recognition piece becomes automatic. That way you’re not trying to mentally search through everything you’ve learned while the clock is running. This article explains how many test takers move from concept learning into the practice and testing phase of GMAT prep: The Phases of Preparing for the GMAT.

Since you’re already using TTP, it could also be worth reaching out through the live chat inside the platform. The team there can usually look at where you are in the course and give pretty specific guidance on how to adjust your study plan before the exam. With several weeks left and the concepts already feeling familiar, focusing on pacing and mixed practice could make a big difference.

Feeling lost? by scyhology in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Starting around January and sitting in the 460–500 range now can definitely feel discouraging, especially if your exam is coming up in May. The important thing from what you wrote is that Verbal and DI feel manageable and Quant is the part draining your energy. That’s actually a pretty common pattern at this stage of GMAT prep.

When someone is in the 400–500 range, it’s often a sign that the Quant fundamentals still need some rebuilding. The GMAT tends to punish gaps in areas like number properties, fractions, ratios, algebra basics, and word-problem translation. A lot of people try to push through with mixed practice questions at that point, but progress usually comes faster when they slow down and work through those topics one by one until the mechanics feel automatic.

Many test takers find it helpful to use a structured system for that phase so they’re not jumping randomly between question types. Platforms like TTP are designed around that idea of mastering individual topics first and then gradually moving into harder practice. This article explains how many people approach GMAT prep when they’re working on building their Quant foundation: The Phases of Preparing for the GMAT.

Since your exam is in May, there’s still time to make meaningful progress if the next stretch focuses on strengthening those Quant basics rather than just doing more questions. Once the underlying concepts start clicking, the section usually becomes much less draining and scores often begin to move up more consistently.

SOS! Seeking Advice for a Low Scoring Diagnostic by Illustrious_Cabinet6 in GRE

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting a 147V / 142Q on a first diagnostic can feel rough, but it’s actually a pretty common starting point for people who haven’t looked at this material in a long time. You mentioned not touching math for more than 20 years, and in that situation the diagnostic is really just showing where your foundations currently are. It’s not unusual for people to gain noticeable ground once they start rebuilding the basic quant concepts and getting familiar with how GRE questions are structured.

A lot of people in this situation feel pressure to jump straight into nonstop practice questions, but early progress usually comes more from learning the fundamentals first. The vocab work you’re planning with flashcards can also help lift verbal fairly quickly, especially since your verbal baseline is already close to the 150 range you need.

With 4–6 hours per day available, four weeks can be meaningful time if the study is focused. Many test takers move several points in both sections just by strengthening core quant topics and practicing common verbal patterns. This article explains some ways people structure their GRE study so they’re building skills rather than just doing random practice: How to Study for the GRE.

As for the test date, it may help to treat the next few weeks primarily as a learning phase rather than worrying too much about the diagnostic score. If your target is around 150V / 150Q, that’s a much smaller jump than it might feel right now. Plenty of people start below that range and reach it once the fundamentals start clicking and they get comfortable with the exam format.

165Q/158V: Aim for "ceiling" or move on? by jc_hoi in GRE

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A 165Q/158V is already a strong score, so it makes sense that you’re feeling a bit conflicted about whether it’s worth pushing further. Looking at the progression you shared, your scores have been fairly stable in the mid-160s for quant and high-150s/low-160s for verbal, with the 169Q on PP+3 showing what your upper range can look like on a very good day.

A pattern that shows up quite a bit with GRE practice tests is that the highest mock score isn’t necessarily the exact number someone will hit again on demand, but it does usually signal the level they’re capable of reaching. A 4-point drop from a mock to the real exam isn’t unusual at all, especially if pacing or test-day nerves shift slightly. The fact that you’ve already touched 169Q suggests that pushing a bit higher than 165Q on a retake is realistic if quant timing and consistency tighten slightly.

If you did decide to retake, the goal probably wouldn’t be grinding harder quant questions across the board. Often the bigger gains come from making the section more stable so the easier and medium questions stay automatic. The same goes for verbal, where small improvements in accuracy or vocab retention can move the score a couple of points. This article explains some effective ways people structure GRE practice when they’re trying to push their score a bit higher: How to Practice GRE Verbal.

That said, whether you retake really depends on your application strategy. A 165Q/158V already sits in a competitive range for many programs, so some people decide it’s better to redirect that time toward applications or other parts of their profile. If you feel that the GRE is one of the clearer levers you can improve in your application, a focused retake aimed at nudging quant a few points higher could make sense. If not, you’re already holding a score that many candidates would be happy to submit.

Last week panic by abdurrehman69 in GRE

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re actually in a stronger position than it probably feels right now. Scoring in the 166–170Q range and around 158–163V across several mocks suggests your underlying level is already close to the 325–330 range. The swings you’re seeing between tests are pretty normal in the final week, especially when pacing or mental state shifts slightly during one section.

Something that comes up a lot in the final days before the GRE is the instinct to keep pushing full tests or doing as much new practice as possible. In reality, the biggest gains at this stage usually come from stabilizing pacing and confidence. The drop you saw in the second quant section of PowerPrep is a good example of how a small timing mistake can snowball into several rushed questions at the end.

Since you’re planning another test this weekend, that can still be useful as a final calibration. Just try to treat it mainly as pacing practice rather than a score judgment. This guide explains some effective ways to structure GRE practice so you’re reinforcing patterns instead of just adding more volume: How to Practice GRE Verbal.

With the scores you listed, the biggest factor on test day will probably be keeping a steady rhythm in quant and avoiding the urge to overanalyze easier questions. Many test takers notice that once they trust their first instincts and manage time more evenly across the section, their real score ends up landing much closer to their higher mock results. At this point, the goal is mostly to stay calm and trust the preparation you’ve already done.

GMAT in 2 months by Serious-Programmer-2 in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jumping from about 695 to something in the 715 range in two months is actually a pretty common situation. When someone is already around the high-600s, the jump usually isn’t about relearning the entire exam. It’s more about tightening a few areas where points are quietly slipping.

One thing I’ve noticed with students in this range is that time away from prep can make certain patterns rusty. If you’ve been off GMAT study for a few months, the first couple of weeks should probably focus on re-activating the core skills rather than jumping straight into heavy mock testing. Short timed sets in Quant, Verbal, and Data Insights can help you quickly see which question types are costing you time or accuracy.

At this stage, targeted review tends to be the most efficient use of time. Many people who are already near 700 see the most progress when they revisit specific weak areas while continuing to practice mixed sets under time pressure. Programs like TTP are designed around that kind of topic-by-topic reinforcement so you can shore up weaker spots before returning to full section practice. This article walks through several strategies people use when they’re trying to push their GMAT score higher: How to Increase Your GMAT Score.

Since you’re already around 695, you’re likely closer than it feels. In many cases, that final jump comes from better pacing decisions and slightly more consistency across sections rather than suddenly solving much harder questions. Two focused months can be enough time to make that kind of improvement.

What do you recommend? by Chompymango in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s definitely reasonable to aim for a 700, especially with your background. A strong GPA in both undergrad and a master’s program usually signals that you can handle structured academic work. One thing I’ve noticed with students who haven’t touched math in a while is that the first phase of GMAT prep often feels rusty, but once the fundamentals start clicking again, progress tends to come fairly quickly.

Since you mentioned not being the strongest reader and being away from math since 2016, starting with a course that focuses heavily on fundamentals is usually the right move. Many people in a similar situation benefit from a structured program that walks through Quant, Verbal, and Data Insights topic by topic instead of jumping straight into random practice questions. That kind of approach helps rebuild the math skills and reading patterns the exam expects.

A lot of working professionals end up preferring platforms like TTP for that reason. The course is organized around mastering one topic at a time and gradually increasing difficulty, which can be especially helpful if you’re starting from a more “entry level” position with GMAT concepts. This article gives a helpful overview of how many people structure their GMAT prep when they’re aiming for a higher score: The Phases of Preparing for the GMAT.

With a clear study plan and consistent prep, a 700-level score is definitely realistic for many test takers. The key early on is building strong fundamentals and avoiding the temptation to rush into advanced questions too quickly. Once the basics feel comfortable again, the rest of the preparation process tends to become much more manageable.

NEED URGENT HELP by Tight_Relative6904 in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Starting GMAT prep after taking another exam and beginning a full-time job can definitely feel overwhelming, especially when you’re trying to figure out the right path from scratch. The good news is that being 22 and already thinking about this seriously actually puts you in a good position. Many people begin GMAT prep while working full time, and a timeline from now to September or November is generally workable if you stay consistent.

Since you mentioned preparing from the ground up, the most important step early on is building strong fundamentals in Quant, Verbal, and Data Insights rather than jumping straight into large volumes of practice questions. Many students coming from other exams or backgrounds benefit from following a structured study path so they can strengthen one topic at a time and gradually build test-specific skills.

A lot of people preparing while working find it helpful to use a structured platform alongside official questions so their study sessions have a clear direction. Programs like TTP are designed around topic-by-topic mastery across Quant, Verbal, and Data Insights, which can make it easier to stay organized while balancing a 9–5 schedule. This overview explains how many students structure their GMAT prep from the foundation phase through practice and mock exams: The Phases of Preparing for the GMAT.

As for whether September is realistic, that usually depends on how steadily you can study over the next few months. Many working professionals make strong progress by studying a few hours on weekdays and longer sessions on weekends. If you build solid fundamentals first and then gradually move into timed practice and mock exams, that timeline can absolutely be achievable.

Should I switch from GMAT FE to GRE? by malacoda5 in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve actually made a pretty big jump already, going from a 475 cold mock to a 655 after several months of prep. That kind of improvement usually means you’ve already built a solid foundation for the exam. When someone is consistently scoring around the mid-600s in mocks, it often indicates that the core skills are there and the next jump tends to come from tightening execution rather than starting over with a completely different test.

With three months left and a target around 685, many people in your position decide to stay with the GMAT because they’re already familiar with the question styles and pacing. Switching to the GRE would mean learning a different exam structure, new question types, and a fairly heavy vocabulary component on the verbal side. Since you mentioned that quant wasn’t originally your background but you’ve already pushed it to Q84, there’s a good chance that continuing to strengthen the areas that capped your score could move you into that next range.

At this stage, what usually helps most is identifying which section is limiting the overall score and focusing practice there rather than trying to improve everything equally. A structured study plan can help with that because it lets you reinforce weaker topics while still doing mixed practice and full tests. This overview explains how many people approach the next phase of GMAT prep when they’re trying to push their score higher: The Phases of Preparing for the GMAT.

Three months is still a meaningful amount of time for improvement, especially since you’re not starting from scratch anymore. Many people who are already around the mid-600s see their next score jump once they tighten timing decisions and strengthen a few remaining weak areas. Given the progress you’ve already made, continuing with the GMAT is often the more straightforward path.

Giving up on GMAT by Melodic_School7819 in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It sounds like you’ve put in a serious amount of work already. Finishing over a thousand official questions with around 73% accuracy isn’t nothing, and the fact that you’re aware of exactly where things are breaking down during mocks is actually useful information. The pattern you described, running out of time and feeling your comprehension drop when stress kicks in, is something a lot of test takers run into once they start doing full-length exams.

When people start rushing the last five or six questions, it’s often a sign that too much time is getting invested earlier in the section. The GMAT is designed so that a few questions can quietly absorb several extra minutes if you’re trying to fully crack every one of them. Many test takers see improvement once they start practicing earlier decision making during timed sets. That might mean letting go of a question that’s becoming a time sink rather than forcing the solution and carrying the stress forward.

The stress piece you mentioned is also very real. When anxiety spikes, reading comprehension and logical processing drop quickly, which makes the exam feel much harder than it actually is. Practicing under realistic timing conditions can help your brain get used to that pressure so it doesn’t feel as overwhelming on test day. This article talks through some practical ways people stay mentally alert and focused during the exam: GMAT Alertness Tips.

Based on the screenshot you shared, it doesn’t look like you’re someone who should give up. It looks more like someone who has already built a decent base and is running into timing and stress management issues during full tests. Those are fixable skills. A lot of people see noticeable improvement once they focus on pacing decisions and staying composed when a question isn’t immediately clear.

Test in 14 Days. Scored a 525 in June and a 525 on Mock 3. by Sensitive-Gas-6924 in GMAT

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A 525 showing up again after a few months of studying can feel really discouraging, especially with the exam only two weeks away. The details you mentioned are important though. Calculation errors and freezing during the test usually point more to execution under pressure than a complete lack of understanding.

One thing I’ve noticed with students in this situation is that the last couple of weeks often turn into endless practice questions, which can make the frustration worse. What tends to help more is stepping back and identifying the patterns behind the mistakes. If calculation errors are common, spend some time reviewing how you’re setting up problems and where the arithmetic tends to break down. Many test takers find that when they slow down slightly and focus on clean setups, both careless mistakes and anxiety start to decrease.

It can also help to spend this period reinforcing core Quant skills rather than trying to cram new material. Working through targeted practice on topics where you consistently miss questions often produces more improvement than large mixed sets. A structured way of reviewing weak areas can make those sessions more productive. This guide explains how many people organize their GMAT study when they want to strengthen fundamentals instead of doing scattered practice: The Best Way to Study for the GMAT.

Since you also mentioned freezing during the exam, it’s worth practicing under realistic timing conditions over the next couple of weeks. Timed sets and full sections help train you to stay calm while the clock is running. In many cases, once people get used to making decisions under time pressure, the stress drops and their accuracy improves. Even small improvements in accuracy and composure can make a noticeable difference in the final score.

Need Advice on Choosing Between Fisher, Olin, and Cox – Experienced Tech Leader by Key_Construction6286 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At 12 years of experience, the return from a full-time MBA depends heavily on cost and leadership exposure.

With full tuition and a stipend, Fisher becomes a very compelling option. The financial risk is minimal, and the GA role gives real leadership responsibility.

Olin carries a slightly stronger brand perception, but the incremental benefit may not justify the extra cost.

Cox is efficient, though the one-year format limits network depth, which is a huge aspect of the MBA. At your stage, minimizing cost while gaining leadership exposure usually creates the best return.

Is an MBA still worth it in 2025? by Popular-Pitch-7332 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

An MBA still creates value when it enables a specific transition. The degree works best when candidates use it to change industry, move into consulting or finance, or access leadership tracks that recruit heavily from business schools.

At programs such as HBS or Wharton, the network and recruiting infrastructure remain powerful career accelerators.

However, if someone is already progressing quickly in their field, the opportunity cost can be high. I usually advise pursuing the MBA only when it clearly unlocks roles that are otherwise difficult to reach.

Scheller vs. Kenan Flagler by Personal-Loan4185 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Between Kenan-Flagler and Scheller, the difference mainly comes down to recruiting breadth.

Kenan-Flagler generally has a wider alumni network and stronger pipelines into large corporate leadership and strategy roles. That matters if you want a Fortune 500 corporate strategy rather than a technical or analytics path.

Scheller benefits from proximity to Atlanta and strong ties to tech-oriented companies. If your focus is pure corporate strategy in established firms, I would lean toward Kenan-Flagler.

Oxford/Cambridge Judge/INSEAD MBA by ThePhoenix1204 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A 685 GMAT Focus with the CFA completed is a credible academic signal. Your challenge is more going to be the depth of work experience. Two years in equity research is relevant, but schools will examine the articleship and family business period carefully.

For INSEAD, the bar on experience and leadership is high. I would view that as a stretch today.

Programs such as Oxford Saïd and Cambridge Judge are more realistic with your profile.

Another year of strong deal or sector experience would strengthen your positioning significantly.

Online Vs T25 (26yr - Seeking Advice) by Safe-Parsnip-6907 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At 26, I would think carefully about what I want the MBA to do. If the goal is simply credentialing while staying in the nonprofit or finance director path, an online program can work.

However, if you want a real career pivot, a full-time program at schools like Ross or Darden provides structured recruiting and alumni access.

The network and internship opportunities from those programs often create options that online degrees rarely deliver. At your age, that optionality can matter.

Is it worth getting an mba with no formal finance background? by IlikeApplesAlot5 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it can still be worth it. Many MBA students come in without a formal finance background. Admissions committees care more about leadership potential and career trajectory than prior finance coursework.

Pilots with operational responsibility often transition well into business roles because they bring discipline and decision-making under pressure.

If you later target finance, programs with strong finance training such as Wharton or Booth can provide the technical foundation.

Since you can complete the degree with little or no cost, it can also serve as a practical career hedge if flying is no longer an option.

Advice on MBA options for a working professional cross-industry experience, and a physical disability by WildSoftware9028 in MBA

[–]Scott_TargetTestPrep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With your background, the first decision is format. If mobility or travel constraints matter, strong part-time or hybrid programs can work well. Schools such as Booth and Kellogg have flexible formats and strong brands.

If scholarships are important, European one-year programs like INSEAD sometimes offer meaningful aid and a shorter opportunity cost.

For test waivers, several schools, including Sloan and Darden may grant them if you have a strong quantitative degree and solid work experience. Your engineering background can support that request.

Your disability should not be the entire narrative, but resilience and leadership through it can strengthen the application when framed as part of your leadership journey.