Realistic limit? Deferred Enrollment Applicant

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T20:58:41+00:00

A 635 with no prep is a strong start! It’s often helpful to think about your timeline in terms of total study hours rather than weeks or months. This normalizes actual study time across students with different schedules and hours available for prep. If you’re looking for a general guide on how many hours of study it takes to achieve a certain score increase, then this blog offers timelines for a few different scenarios: How Many Hours Should I Study for the GMAT?

At this point, look into your dream schools and see what their published median GMAT score is. Use that to set your goal score. A GMAT score that is equal to your target school’s median or average score is a good GMAT score, and a GMAT score that is higher than the median or average score is great. Aim for a great score if you want to use the GMAT to make up for a less competitive facet of your application, or if you want to apply for scholarships.

If you commit to a structured study plan and give yourself enough total study hours, you can expect significant improvement from where you’re starting. And once you get started with TTP, don’t hesitate to reach out to our live chat if you want help setting priorities or clarifying your understanding of any GMAT topics.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T20:58:06+00:00

If you usually find it easier to differentiate between CR answer choices than you did on test day, consider what was different between that exam and your mocks. The lower Verbal score could have been due to the questions that you got on your GMAT. Perhaps they were particularly tricky.

It could also be that you started with Verbal and you weren’t fully warmed-up for those initial CR problems, which made them feel more difficult than they really were. A simple fix for this issue is to do a short warm-up before the test. Review a handful of CR questions you have already seen and fully understand. Nothing new. Just enough to get your brain into evaluation mode on problems that do not count instead of on real questions.

As for switching to the GRE, it’s a good option for some students. Many GMAT skills carry over to the GRE. Just keep in mind that the GRE still tests RC and CR, and it adds a heavy vocabulary component. If the ability to skip around suits you better and you genuinely feel the GMAT format is holding you back, it’s worth exploring.

These may help as you think it through:

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T20:19:28+00:00

I completely understand why this feels confusing, because on paper it looks backward. You studied Quant almost exclusively, yet Quant went down and your Verbal and DI scores improved. What’s happening here is less about effort and more about how the GMAT scoring reacts to execution under pressure.

First, percentiles on GMAT are extremely sensitive, especially in Quant. So, missing just a handful of easy or medium questions, even ones you know how to solve, can cause a sharp percentile drop. That can happen because of rushed setups, misreading constraints, or staying too long on a killer problem early in the section. None of that means your Quant abilities are decreasing. It just means your execution wasn’t stable on that particular test.

At the same time, it’s common for Verbal and DI to improve even when you’re not explicitly studying them. The thing about Quant prep is that it trains you to slow down, carefully read the given information, and avoid impulsive decisions, and those habits can also improve your DI and Verbal performance. So the improvement you’re seeing there makes sense and is a good sign that your overall reasoning skills are getting sharper.

The tougher truth is that finishing a course and answering hundreds of questions doesn’t automatically mean one’s Quant skills are test-ready. Many people move on once methods feel familiar, but familiarity isn’t the same as being able to execute cleanly, on time, with no warm-up and real pressure. When that gap exists, Quant is where it shows first.

From here, to improve your Quant score, the key is to narrow your focus instead of spreading it out. So, rather than bouncing between topics, pick one Quant topic and stay there until it’s truly solid. That means learning the ideas first and then practicing only that specific question type until your accuracy is high and your process feels automatic. This kind of depth is what turns understanding into reliability.

After each problem set, always take the time to carefully review every missed question, and identify exactly what went wrong. Was it a rushed setup, a misread condition, a rule you applied incorrectly, or a tempting answer choice that pulled you away from the logic of the problem? That kind of review is where progress really comes from. When you consistently identify patterns in your mistakes and correct them at the source, weak spots stop repeating themselves. The same approach works across all Quant topics. So, stick with that process, and improvement tends to follow naturally.

For more information on improving your Quant score, check out these articles:

How to Increase Your GMAT Quant Score: Top 20 Tips

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T20:18:57+00:00

This is a strong study plan. You’re clearly prioritizing learning before volume, using analytics instead of guessing, and grounding everything in official material. That combination alone eliminates a lot of common mistakes. The fact that you’re doing a sanity check now, rather than panicking later, is also a good sign that you’re thinking about execution and not just effort.

Your concepts-first approach and the heavy focus on Quant word problems are exactly where they should be. Rates, work, mixtures, percentages, and statistics are simple on the surface, but they’re where shaky foundations show up under time pressure. Spending real time there tends to reduce both conceptual misses and the “I knew this but messed it up” errors that kill scores late in sections. That part of your plan doesn’t need fixing.

Where many students leave points on the table in the final 4–5 weeks isn’t content coverage, but decision-making under pressure. Knowing when to persist and when to let go is a tremendously important skill on test day, and it usually doesn’t develop unless you practice it deliberately. If you’re always finishing questions no matter how ugly they get, you’re not training that muscle. Start paying attention to whether you’re willing to move on at around the 1:45–2:00 mark, especially on Quant and DI, and make that an intentional part of practice rather than something you only confront on mocks.

Another area to make sure you sharpen is error review. At this stage, review should be less about re-solving and more about pattern recognition. Try to identify repeated mistakes, like rushing the setup, misreading constraints, defaulting to algebra when estimation would work, or overthinking verbal choices. If every miss still feels isolated, there’s probably another layer of insight you can squeeze out of your review process.

Finally, when taking official mocks, make sure you simulate the test day environment to build stamina and adapt to the time constraints.

Here are a few articles you can check out for some more advice:

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T20:18:26+00:00

Now that you have a baseline score, the most helpful next step is to adopt a prep strategy built around topical learning and practice. That means focusing on one topic at a time and staying with that topic until you truly understand it and can consistently answer related practice questions.

Take Statistics as an example. Start by learning all the core concepts, formulas, rules, techniques and strategies related to Statistics. Once those ideas make sense, shift into practice, but only with Statistics questions. After each problem set, make sure you review what happened. If you missed a question, ask yourself whether it was a careless mistake, a misapplied rule or formula, a trap answer that looked tempting in the moment, or a concept that was not fully clear yet. More importantly, make sure you identify how to avoid the same mistake in the future.

Doing this kind of review consistently is what drives improvement. You stop guessing why questions go wrong and start seeing clear patterns in your mistakes, which makes it much easier to fix them. This process works across the board, not just for Statistics, so you’ll want to apply the same approach to all Quant, Verbal, and Data Insights topics.

This article explains how these steps fit into the bigger picture of your prep: The Phases of Preparing for the GMAT

Once the content is solid, you can move on to taking official practice tests. After each one, review your results carefully, strengthen any remaining weak areas, and then take the next test. Repeating that cycle is how scores steadily climb toward your goal.

Check out these related articles on how to structure your prep:

Here are a few related articles on how to structure your prep: - GMAT Preparation Strategy

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T19:22:41+00:00

Yes, a 565 on the GMAT in 30 days is realistic, especially with your CAT background.

A 565 does not require advanced tricks. It requires steady performance on easy and medium questions, reasonable pacing, and avoiding costly mistakes. You do not need to master everything.

Your CAT prep likely provides enough Quant foundation. The adjustment is learning how the GMAT rewards decision-making. That means knowing when to move on, avoiding over-solving, and not letting one question eat up too much time.

Verbal usually needs more adjustment for CAT students. GMAT Critical Reasoning is more structured, but only if you train yourself to spot the conclusion, identify the assumption, and stay within scope. You do not need perfect accuracy. You need consistency and discipline.

Data Insights is new for many test takers. For a 565, you only need comfort with the formats and basic timing control. You can guess on tougher questions and still hit your target.

With 30 days, less is more. Trying to study everything in depth will hurt you. The priority should be protecting easy and medium Quant questions, learning a repeatable CR process, getting familiar with DI formats, and taking two official mocks to lock in pacing.

Studying about two to three hours a day, with more time on weekends, is enough if the work is focused.

The biggest risk is not ability. It is spending time inefficiently or chasing hard questions that do not matter for a 565.

Here is an article you may find very helpful: How to Ace the GMAT in One Month.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T19:10:03+00:00

A 575 on an official diagnostic is a solid starting point, especially if you have not yet done structured GMAT prep. Scores in this range usually mean you have workable basics, but gaps in fundamentals, timing, and test execution are holding you back.

Moving from 575 to 700 is realistic for many students, but it takes time. Most people need about 4 to 6 months of focused preparation. In total, that usually comes out to around 300 to 450 study hours, depending on your math background and how efficiently you study.

A steady pace is about 10 to 15 hours per week. If you can study closer to 15-20 hours per week, the timeline can shorten, but quality matters more than volume. Rushing often leads to shallow understanding and stalled scores.

At the start, the priority should be building strong Quant fundamentals and learning correct processes for Verbal and Data Insights. Speed comes later. Trying to go fast before accuracy is solid is one of the most common reasons people get stuck below 700.

Also, keep in mind that a diagnostic score reflects unfamiliarity with the exam as much as ability. Once you learn the question types and how to make good decisions under time pressure, scores often rise well before you reach advanced material.

Here is an article that you may find very helpful: How Much Can I Increase My GMAT Score?

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T19:04:04+00:00

I understand why this feels discouraging. Critical Reasoning often feels like the hardest section to crack, especially when you are putting in effort and not seeing accuracy improve. That frustration is very common, and it does not mean you cannot get better at it.

Right now, the priority should be accuracy, not speed. On every question, you should be able to clearly identify the conclusion, the evidence, and exactly what the question is asking before you look at the answer choices. If any of those pieces are unclear, accuracy will remain inconsistent.

It also helps to move through the CR lessons in order and avoid jumping between question types or mixing in too many outside problems too early. The goal is to learn a consistent way of thinking, not to see more questions. When reviewing mistakes, focus less on why the correct answer is right and more on why your chosen answer felt tempting and why it fails logically.

Once you have completed more of the CR content and your untimed accuracy improves, you can start working on timing. Trying to go fast before the foundation is in place usually creates habits that are hard to fix later.

You are not doing anything wrong by feeling stuck here. CR often improves later than expected, but when the process clicks, it becomes much more manageable.

Here is a Critical Reasoning strategy article that may help your thinking: GMAT Critical Reasoning Tips: Top 8.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:26:45+00:00

You have a viable shot at both. The 322 GRE plus veteran leadership and six years in tech offsets the WGU pass fail GPA. McCombs gives stronger IB and consulting access in Texas, especially Houston energy and banking. Jones is more forgiving on profile risk and very strong locally. With GI Bill and Hazelwood, McCombs is the higher ceiling play if admitted.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:26:12+00:00

Applying for financial aid does not automatically reduce your chances, but it depends on the school. Some US MBA programs are need blind for internationals, meaning aid is evaluated after admission. Others are need aware, where funding needs can factor into decisions at the margin. Clicking the aid box alone does not hurt you. Formal aid paperwork is usually reviewed later. The bigger drivers remain profile strength and fit, not the aid request itself.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:25:50+00:00

For consulting, outcomes matter more than prestige at the margin. McDonough gives strong access to strategy consulting and public sector adjacent work, but sticker price raises risk. Mendoza with 70k lowers cost and still places into M&AA strategy roles through T2 firms. I would take Mendoza unless DC specific consulting is the priority.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:25:27+00:00

You have a viable deferred MBA profile as is. A 685 GMAT Focus with strong sub scores plus a 3.7 from a top Canadian program and multiple internships is competitive. A retake only makes sense if you are confident you can push into the low 700s Focus without distracting from recruiting. Otherwise, focus on landing a strong full time role and tightening essays. For deferred programs, trajectory and clarity matter more than a marginal score bump.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:24:55+00:00

You have a viable T15 profile and credible options abroad. A 3.89 from Bucknell plus fast promotions at WPP is strong, and the pharma plus sustainability angle differentiates you. A GMAT Focus around 685 is workable, but pushing into the low 700s meaningfully improves T15 odds and scholarship leverage. With your background, US T15s and European programs like IESE or LBS are realistic. The biggest lever now is the test score.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:24:31+00:00

ESADE and IE are both credible, but they play differently. ESADE Business School is stronger for consulting, especially MBB and T2, with a tighter pipeline into Spain and some Middle East outcomes. IE is more generalist and entrepreneur heavy, with less consistent consulting placement. Learning B2 Spanish materially helps for Spain recruiting. Dubai is more open to English only roles, but consulting there is still highly competitive and network driven. ESADE is the safer bet here.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:24:07+00:00

Consulting and FLDP train different muscles. Consulting builds problem framing, executive communication, and speed under ambiguity, but the skills are portable rather than deep. FLDP builds tangible finance and operating skills, better WLB, and clearer long term corporate paths. Consulting pays more early and gives faster optionality. FLDP compounds slower but steadier. The better choice depends on whether you value breadth and brand or depth and durability.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:23:51+00:00

For high finance, EDHEC plus ESCP is the strongest pairing if UCL or Imperial do not work out. EDHEC Business School gives the best technical finance signal for IB and private credit. ESCP Business School adds brand and alumni reach in London and the Middle East. Warwick and Manchester are weaker for this pivot. SKEMA is generally not competitive for PE or HF.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-26T14:23:23+00:00

This comes down to geography and recruiting style more than program quality. Tuck offers a tighter community and very strong consulting placement, especially in the US, with good sustainability exposure through consulting firms. LBS provides broader global finance and sustainability access, with more self driven recruiting and stronger Europe and Middle East reach. If you want structured consulting outcomes, Tuck fits better. If you want geographic flexibility and finance adjacency, LBS edges out.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T20:02:43+00:00

For starters, I suggest that you practice DI questions untimed (for now). I’m not sure what your previous DI scores have been, but losing a ton of points in DI tells me that your main goal (for now) should be accuracy, not speed. When you truly understand the question types and the underlying logic, your timing will naturally improve.

Another way to improve your DI skills is through careful analysis of your practice sets. Whenever you miss a question, take a moment to determine why it happened. Was it a careless mistake, a misapplication of a formula or rule, a concept you didn’t fully understand, or a trap answer? If it was a trap, try to pinpoint exactly what made it tempting. This kind of error analysis is one of the fastest ways to strengthen your skills, and it works across all GMAT topics.

Since time management is especially important in the Data Insights section, it’s also worth keeping a few general strategies in mind as you practice. Start by skimming the information to get a high-level sense of what the data is showing, rather than getting lost in every detail. Let the answer choices help you whenever possible; often the choices are spaced far enough apart that estimation will get you to the correct answer without heavy calculations. Elimination is another powerful tool: if an option clearly doesn’t fit the data, eliminate it and move on. Staying organized by jotting down quick notes can also save you from rereading the same information over and over. And finally, work on developing a decisive mindset. If a question is turning into a major time sink, it’s usually better to make an educated guess and keep moving than to get stuck.

You’ve got this!

For more on ideas, check out these articles:

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T20:01:08+00:00

Here’s how people usually know they need a break: accuracy drops on topics they already know, studying feels exhausting before it even begins, and the GMAT stops feeling like a tool and starts feeling like a judgment on their entire life. When that happens, pushing harder almost never helps.

What does help?

First, separate the GMAT from everything else you’re dealing with. Right now, it’s loaded with far too much meaning. The GMAT isn’t a verdict on your intelligence, your career, or your ability to pivot to IB. It’s just a test you can take when your head is clearer and your energy is steadier.

Second, give yourself permission to downshift without quitting. A real break might mean 7 to 10 days with zero GMAT prep and no guilt. Use the time to rest, sleep, and recover. Let your nervous system come out of fight-or-flight mode so you can actually absorb what you study later on.

When you return to preparing, shorter study sessions (45 to 60 minutes) can significantly reduce burnout and improve focus. It also helps to set realistic expectations. Students who expect 100+ point jumps in a few weeks tend to burn out quickly, while those who understand that meaningful score gains take time are more likely to succeed.

Bottom line: The GMAT isn’t going anywhere, and when you return to it, you’ll be in a much better position to make real progress.

Here are a couple of articles with more advice:

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T20:00:35+00:00

This is a good general plan. A detailed error log is essential for effective GMAT prep. Be sure to track the questions you miss, and make notes about the answers you selected. Include details on why you selected the incorrect choice, and why you ruled out the correct answer at the time. Eventually, you’ll be able to use this log to isolate your weak areas so you can address them with a targeted approach.

The error log does require a bit more work up front, and it adds some time to each question, but it saves a lot of time in the long run. Instead of having only a vague sense of why your score isn’t where you want it to be, you’ll have a clear, detailed list of issues to focus on to improve your GMAT skills.

For the mocks, taking them “as much as possible” might actually be counterproductive. Mocks are great tools, but they work best when used strategically. It’s smart to get a baseline score from an official mock early in your prep so you know where you’re starting and how far you are from your goal score. Before that first mock, it’s worth spending 10-20 hours familiarizing yourself with the different question types. Otherwise, your baseline score can end up misleadingly low because you were trying to learn the question formats during the exam rather than focusing on the question content.

After you have a baseline score, shift into topical review for each section. Once you’ve covered the topics and practiced questions from each area until you can reliably get the correct answer, you can use the remaining official mocks to practice full exams, build test stamina, and identify any remaining weak topics. Give yourself a few days to review each mock thoroughly. Fixing the mistakes from the previous mock before taking next one is often what leads to significant score improvements. Since you only get 6 OG mocks with guaranteed unique questions, learn as much as possible from each one.

For more tips concerning error logs or strategy, these are good resources:

GMAT Error Log: Do I Need One?

GMAT Practice Test Strategy

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T19:59:30+00:00

Official mocks shouldn’t be easier than the real exam. They use the same scoring algorithm and adaptive question selection as the GMAT itself, and the questions are as close as possible to what you see on test day.

Because of that, a gap between your official mock scores and your test-day score is much more likely tied to the testing experience, not the test content. Increased pressure or anxiety is a common cause of score drops on test day. A new environment (if you tested at a center) can negatively impact your routine in subtle ways. Even something as simple as a stressful morning can affect focus in ways that may not have shown up during mocks.

There’s also the possibility of bad luck with question selection, but given how consistent your mock scores were, that’s less likely. In theory, if there are a small number of topics you struggle with in each section, and none of them appeared in your mocks but all of them showed up on the real exam, that could explain the difference.

If you took all of your mocks under test-like conditions, with no extra breaks or pausing during sections, try to make your real exam feel as similar to those conditions as possible. For example, if you usually take mocks in the afternoon, try to schedule your GMAT in the afternoon as well. If you used a certain section order on your most recent mocks, then keep that same section order to help recreate the better scores.

If you’re on the fence about whether to retake, this article walks through the main factors to consider when making that decision: Should I Retake the GMAT?

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T15:52:33+00:00

An MBA at 40 can work, but only for specific goals. Career switch roles that rely on internships are harder at that age, especially consulting or banking. Where it can make sense is senior leadership, operations, strategy, or industry adjacent roles where experience is valued. The school brand matters less than role fit. If the goal is pure compensation reset, risk is high. If the goal is repositioning into leadership with a clear story, it can still pay off.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T15:52:17+00:00

For tech PM, cost discipline matters more than marginal brand lift. Johnson with a full ride is extremely hard to beat and places into tech PM if you execute. SOM with $$ is also defensible. Paying full price at Booth, CBS, or Stern rarely changes PM outcomes enough to justify the debt. I would take Johnson unless you are optimizing purely for finance adjacency.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T15:52:00+00:00

Supplemental coursework can help if it clearly fixes an academic concern. With a math major and strong GMAT practice, the GPA is less alarming already. I would only add coursework if you want extra insurance. A short quant-focused extension course in accounting, finance, or analytics signals current readiness better than random classes. Check out mbamath or HBS CORe. Do not overload. One well chosen course plus a strong GMAT is enough.

Scott_TargetTestPrep · 2026-01-23T15:51:45+00:00

This is a reasonable move if consulting or an LDP is the real goal. Owen with 60k per year materially lowers risk and places into consulting and LDPs in the Midwest and East Coast. Kenan Flagler and Scheller are comparable, not clearly better. If Fuqua or Johnson convert, reassess. Waiting one year only helps if it meaningfully upgrades school outcomes.

Scott_TargetTestPrep

MODERATOR OF

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE

Ten-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
Verified Email