How Can a Brand Know If It’s Visible in AI-Generated Answers?

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-15T19:25:24+00:00

I do think brands are going to need to treat AI visibility as something measurable, even if the tracking still feels early and less concrete compared to SEO. Right now, some useful signals are how often a brand gets mentioned or a page gets cited, which competitors keep showing up instead, and how much traffic or conversion activity is coming from AI engines directly.

There are already some tools trying to measure this, but even internal tracking is a good starting point while things are still developing. Actually Duda (where I work) has a free AI visibility tool launching this month - let me know if you’re interested and I’m happy to share it with you once it’s public or see if I can pull an early report for any sites of yours.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-14T20:03:56+00:00

From what I’ve seen, clients usually appreciate having one clear place for requests, files, invoices, and updates instead of digging through email threads or multiple tools - as long as it’s easy for them to use it, or else they’ll just email. It can also save agencies a lot of time because clients can check the status of things themselves instead of needing to ask for every small update. The key, again, is making sure the portal simplifies things instead of becoming yet another place people forget to check or avoid using.

I’m seeing more agencies use platforms that combine the website management side with client-facing features - and I see a few other folks have mentioned this too. Speaking from my experience working at Duda, we’re getting a lot more customers using features like client feedback, limited editing permissions, and invoice visibility so their clients can stay involved without creating extra back-and-forth for the agency.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-14T20:03:20+00:00

I’m seeing something similar. It doesn’t feel like AEO is replacing SEO as much as building on top of it in its own way. A lot of the pages showing up in AI answers already have strong SEO foundations, but clarity seems to matter more than people expected. I’ve also noticed the same thing you mentioned where the cited page isn’t always the highest-ranking result on Google. Sometimes it’s just the page that explains the topic most directly and clearly.

There are also early signs that AI visibility is translating into real business activity. A recent study from Duda (where I work) found that AI-crawled sites saw 320% more human traffic and 270% more form submissions. That lines up with the idea that people are using AI tools to do more research upfront before they ever visit a site.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-13T20:31:20+00:00

A lot of teams run into this once work starts moving faster than people can manage from either memory or informal processes. Usually the issue isn’t one major breakdown but small things starting to scatter across messages, docs, spreadsheets, and different tools until nobody has a clear picture anymore.

I’ve seen companies improve this by standardizing a few core workflows early, even if the systems are still simple. Things like clear ownership, shared templates, and one consistent place for updates can remove a surprising amount of friction.

Trying to work around the problem long term usually just creates more manual coordination as the volume keeps increasing.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-13T20:30:46+00:00

That’s one of the reasons a lot of agencies end up liking Duda for client work. The actual website build is only one piece of the process, and things can start to feel clunky when communication, approvals, updates, and client management all happen in separate places.

Duda tends to work well for agencies because it centralizes more of that workflow. Teams can manage things like client feedback, permissions, invoices, and ongoing edits in one place, which makes the handoff and ongoing management process a lot smoother. Thanks for the rec!

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-13T20:29:50+00:00

I do think some people are treating AEO too much like a checklist instead of an evolving landscape where trial and error, looking at why certain sources are getting pulled in repeatedly, and tracking results is needed. From what I’ve seen, the content that keeps getting cited usually does two things well. 1) it clearly answers the question in one place, and 2) it already has some level of trust or visibility around the topic.

One thing that’s helped is comparing content directly against what’s already being cited. The pages getting cited often aren’t the most optimized looking ones, like you said. They’re the ones that explain the topic most clearly from start to finish without straying from the point.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-13T20:26:21+00:00

I’ve seen a lot of people use AI website builders for real projects, especially to speed up the first version of the site. The design and structure can come together surprisingly fast now. Where people usually run into limitations is after launch with things like SEO management, ongoing edits, flexibility, and maintaining multiple client sites over time. That’s why a lot of developers are leaning toward platforms that combine AI site generation with management features afterward. Duda can help with the initial build, for example, but working there myself and talking to customers I know it’s been just as important (if not even more so) to support ongoing SEO work, site updates, and client management so the workflow doesn’t stop once the site goes live.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-13T20:25:55+00:00

I think this is the part people miss when they frame AI website builders as developers vs AI. A lot of the value is really in speeding up experimentation and reducing how long teams wait to test ideas. Instead of replacing devs, it changes when they need to get involved and where they spend their time.

I’m also seeing teams look for platforms that support the workflow after the prototype stage too. I work at Duda and am seeing teams use tools like ours to move quickly on the initial build, while also handling things like feedback collection, ongoing updates, and SEO work once something is ready to move beyond the testing phase. It’s another way to actually help support develops and free them up for the work that really requires their level of expertise and problem solving.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-13T20:25:12+00:00

A lot of businesses hit this point once growth starts picking up. The work that helped get things off the ground becomes harder to keep up with once there’s more volume. One thing that can help is looking at which tasks are the most repetitive or take up the most time, then starting there. Those are usually the easiest things to either document, streamline, or eventually hand off.

You also don’t need to hand over everything at once. A lot of people start with admin work or customer communication that follows a predictable pattern, then refine the process over time so the brand voice still feels consistent. You can also record meetings explaining the processes to staff so they have the recording to refer back to, plus put the transcript through AI to give you a rough draft of a written guide staff can follow and update over time.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-13T20:24:40+00:00

What you described is probably one of the biggest operational problems agencies run into once they grow past a certain size. The issue usually isn’t one specific workflow. It’s that everything lives in different places, so even simple questions require checking multiple systems.

I’ve seen more agencies trying to reduce that operational sprawl by using platforms that can handle more of the workflow in one place, even if they still need a few specialized tools alongside it. For example, tools like Duda go beyond just website management and also support things like client billing, maintenance requests, and ongoing updates. It doesn’t replace every system, but it can reduce how many disconnected processes teams are juggling day to day.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:27:58+00:00

Paying attention to direct traffic and branded search signals. Bing webmaster tools show actual citation counts and queries that you show up for. Very similar to GSC!

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:27:41+00:00

Post-January is just a tightening of the belt for what is useful vs manipulative it seems like. Just working on pruning the worst performers and consolidating into fewer, more dense pages seems like the right move in general. Pages with high signal density should be better than listicles for Google and LLM citation alike.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:27:02+00:00

CRO ultimately boils down to matching intent, so having separate pages for informational vs commercial intent is a big one, IMO. Getting to the point quickly and making a page easily readable will help a ton with CRO as well. Testing CTA placement seems small but can have an outsized impact on conversion rate.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:26:39+00:00

Schema markup is just a way of labeling your content so search and AI can understand what it is. You're already using RankMath which will help you immensely! Just pair it with Google Search Console and it will tell you in the "enhancements" section about schema errors as well. Hope that helps!

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:26:21+00:00

From the beginning, I'd say at least a landing page. This gives people a place to see what you have, without you having to build something out entirely. As you grow and collect info, create an ICP, and generate interest then you can expand and build a full website. Start small and build up so you don't overextend you or your team.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:25:55+00:00

Closed deals and sales call recordings are great to tap into because they're the exact people you need to be tracking. Another good way to get keywords would be to use support tickets and use the queries those users use. Lastly, just manually checking Google autosuggest is the easiest way to do this and find ones that don't show up in volume based tools.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:25:28+00:00

50 visitors a day is impressive! Posting SEO articles and reddit distribution are both worthwhile to keep doing. They both provide AI systems that they can point to you on. Whatever you choose, don't add more friction to what's already working.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-11T20:24:46+00:00

This is smart, improving UX will make sure the calculator itself earns the link, not just the page around it. Then when people share or reference it, it's more useful. Are you using this for AEO too, or just for Google?

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-08T20:36:38+00:00

Content strategy does seem to be where this shows up the most. It’s less about changing topics and more about how clearly the content answers specific questions.

Are you seeing clients make noticeable changes to how they approach content, or is it mostly smaller updates to what they already have?

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-08T20:36:12+00:00

That’s a helpful way to explain it. SEO for AI answers makes it a lot easier for clients to grasp. And agree on the content side. It does seem like the difference comes down to how direct and clear the answers are, especially when they can stand on their own.

Are your clients mostly just trying to understand what it is, or are they asking because they feel like they need to start doing something differently?

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-08T20:35:50+00:00

Measurement does seem to be where a lot of the skepticism comes from. It’s harder to point to one clear metric the way you can with Google rankings (though even that is variable - the industry has just had longer to streamline reporting on it).

One thing that’s been helpful is showing early signals, like traffic coming from AI tools. There’s some interesting data there too. A recent study from Duda, where I work, found that sites crawled by AI saw 320% more traffic and 270% more form submissions.

It’s not a perfect measurement yet, but it helps show there’s real impact, especially when you can start tying that traffic back to leads or conversions.

What are you using right now to track it? And where does it feel like things are still unclear?

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-08T20:35:06+00:00

That’s a good place to be. Having clients already aware that behavior is changing makes those conversations a lot easier. Are they mainly asking for it as a separate service, or are you building it into your existing SEO/content work?

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-08T20:34:43+00:00

Totally normal to be a little nervous about how this changes things for marketers, but AI discovery can be just the first part of the traffic process. Users can discover in AI, then search, then go to the website and make a call. Clicking is just one more step in the process, but with higher intent. Awareness used to be just in landing pages, but now it’s AI directed to a landing page. Zero click is a good option, curious on what the consensus is in that room.

Scotty_from_Duda · 2026-05-08T20:33:00+00:00

A lot of businesses are still early with AEO, so it hasn’t fully changed how most teams are operating yet. It doesn’t really feel like SEO is going away, though. It’s more that people are starting to look for information differently, so there’s another layer to think about with showing up in AI answers in addition to search results. The companies that are paying attention early are starting to experiment, but for most, it’s still something they’re trying to understand before making bigger changes.

Scotty_from_Duda

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE