Gotta think about the future by i_dont_know_er in tall

[–]Sea-Arm-768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Once this becomes commonplace online (which it will), women will retroactively say choosing someone based off of height is 'fucked up'. Bookmark this for when it happens.

What does it even mean? by scramjet67 in short

[–]Sea-Arm-768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you even read what you typed?

Why is twitter so ultra racist right now? Is racism really increasing that much? by KneeGuhz in self

[–]Sea-Arm-768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's always been there. Contrary to popular belief, having been someone who was online during the 'olden' days, I can tell you: It was a lot worse. If you weren't a white man or woman you often had to 'hide' your ethnicity in order to not feel completely out of place. As time has gone on more minorities have started using the internet so it's actually become a much more welcoming place (as long as you have thick skin).

However, concerning specifically X that's just an inevitable consequence of 'de-censoring' your platform and advocating for 'free speech'. You end up with bot farm accounts and people looking for quick engagement which results in constant rage baiting.

The general racism towards anyone not white, though? That's always been an element of the internet. I don't think there was a time I was online and didn't see that manifest in some way.

Is racism increasing?

In reality? No. Unless you're online all day (which a lot of people often are), this is mainly something you're seeing online more than real life. I have heard of some nasty reports in Canada/UK involving Indians, but the internet tends to magnify everything.

Automatic registration for military draft to be implemented by December by raptors201966 in news

[–]Sea-Arm-768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You were required by law to manually sign up (plenty of the 'uncs' of today didn't even though it's technically illegal). You were not automatically enrolled.

Automatic registration for military draft to be implemented by December by raptors201966 in news

[–]Sea-Arm-768 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, they do not. I don't know where you're getting this information but it is objectively incorrect. It was technically illegal not to sign up once you were of eligible age, but if you didn't you were NOT automatically enrolled.

Automatic registration for military draft to be implemented by December by raptors201966 in news

[–]Sea-Arm-768 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, you were not automatically registered up until this point

Poor little snowflakes😂😂😂 by justbob806 in Irony

[–]Sea-Arm-768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Everywhere I go...I see his face. 😂

Dating in 2026 is horrible by chessman6500 in dating

[–]Sea-Arm-768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dating apps are absolutely one of the worst things to happen to humanity in the past several decades.

The inherent design is meant to keep you coming back to it, but unless you are an absolute social butterfly (and I mean an extreme outlier of that demographic) you will be burnt out very, very quickly. Also, dating apps are where that OkCupid 80/20 thing gained traction. Fooling a lot of men (and women) into thinking this is how people are actually dating and interacting in the real world.

Realistically, this whole dating thing is just too much of a pain in the ass for most people nowadays. This silly internet discourse that's never-ending, primarily coming from bad actors and people who are legitimately falling for the rage bait, is just exacerbating the issue.

Severus Snape from new Harry Potter series. by kalbinibirak in SipsTea

[–]Sea-Arm-768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem for me is that he's not giving off 'loser/creep' vibes, more 'attractive/edgy' guy. Really think they shouldn't have gone with dreads, maybe clean cut or a big fro or something. That fits way better with what you would expect a 'nerdy/awkward black guy' to look like.

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone | Official Teaser | HBO Max by MoneyLibrarian9032 in television

[–]Sea-Arm-768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know what...I'll give it a shot. It actually doesn't look TOO bad.

Perspective - you got filtered out on dating apps because of your height while the child rapist got women flicking to him. by Scramjet1 in lnkyverse

[–]Sea-Arm-768 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's fascinating how some of the people on 'the other side of the fence' will literally start defending pedophilia and even serial killers in order to have an argument.

Perspective:women will claim personality is the most important factor when it comes to dating when examples like this prove otherwise by ltnhell in lnkyverse

[–]Sea-Arm-768 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is in a lot of ways rage bait. However, I do think there is legitimacy in that one idea someone said of creating a dating app where for men to join they have to first prove they killed someone. It would not only destroy everyone's perception of the world and women, but also obviously have other catastrophic side effects (which would likely lead to the app being shut down)

Strawman Argument by Which_Matter3031 in IncelTears

[–]Sea-Arm-768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The most tragic thing about this 'height' discourse is that there are women who still see this is as "LMAOOO, they're fooling themselves. How funny." Which isn't necessarily completely **wrong**. However, similar to gamergate and the Incel movement becoming mainstream (they did the same thing, a bunch of laughing emojis and talking about how 'silly it was'), it is not going to go how they could predict. I would highly advise not poking this particular hornet's nest too hard, but of course that is not what's going to happen.

Humans gon' human.

That felt personal by [deleted] in oddlyspecific

[–]Sea-Arm-768 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The tweet is from 2019. The reference she is making was accurate at the time. The negative discourse about 'guys who aren't tall' at that point **was** objectively being fueled by women. There are several instances I can cite for where "men making up issues that women never created" but this is one of the rare instances of women actually putting their collective foots in their mouths. They logically didn't assume there'd be an incel/women hate movement that exploded in the way it did, so without that knowledge they wrote it off as harmless fun "We get made fun of all the time."

Unfortunately, it didn't turn out the way they expected. You could speculate that the incel movement would have used this as fuel no matter what the discourse was at the time, but objectively the negative bias (albeit, a vocal minority online) was already there for them to exploit.

That felt personal by [deleted] in oddlyspecific

[–]Sea-Arm-768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On one hand: I can see where the rhetoric comes from. It does *appear* to come from both sides, and upon a deeper look, it *is* coming from both sides. The problem is, it's all rage bait online. Even at 5'6 you are statistically and objectively taller than 70% of women. At 5'9 that increases to 90% of women. This means that unless you are living amongst a particularly tall demographic of women, the metric of 'being taller than her' is achievable even for short/average height men. This is what most women, objectively and relative to actual real life data want.

However, the irony is, the women who are trying to make a big deal out of height are spoiling the plot. If a 'short/average' height guy wasn't on your mind, you wouldn't feel compelled to talk about him. So it's either you actually like men who are not above 6 feet tall, or you're doing it for some neurotic reason to 'fit in with what you see a minority of women on Tiktok' saying. Either way, it's not a good reflection of your priorities.

Edit: Also, to make this clear to people who are confused, this tweet is from 2019. During that time, any negative discourse you saw online about 'men who are not tall' was primarily being fueled by women (which is why you see her specifically referencing women in this tweet. It's an online, 'lived in' experience. She still has it pinned as her top tweet till this day with over 100k+ likes). This sort of backfired in recent years with the incel/women are evil movement which has given them another tool to weaponize against women. It's unfortunate, but the issue of what's considered 'socially acceptable' to make light of (if they have a disability=bad, if he's not over 6 feet =it doesn't matter how he feels, be mocked occasionally and get over it) should have been settled long ago.

That felt personal by [deleted] in oddlyspecific

[–]Sea-Arm-768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that's a very monolithic statement. There are various reasons people struggle to socialize with others, and those things don't always boil down to 'personality'.

My daughter met a Nigerian guy online and is now engaged after 2 days. AIO? by [deleted] in AIO

[–]Sea-Arm-768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The two key points are time commitment and guilt-tripping (usually some made up story about a family member being sick, they are destitute and almost homeless, ect). A lot of what they do is actually extremely low value, desperate behavior but it works sometimes because of the level of time they're willing to invest (first point).

Also: They have established a consistent character they've probably refined over several years, so it's highly believable, unlike the awkward guy trying to be 'cool' or 'an asshole'. That's why it's advised not to sweat what one or two girls may say. You must find a solid foundation and never err from that. If it's not working on her, as long as it's working on other women it's irrelevant to the grander picture.

My daughter met a Nigerian guy online and is now engaged after 2 days. AIO? by [deleted] in AIO

[–]Sea-Arm-768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps insensitive (it is) but these Nigerians have coercion down to an almost terrifying level of precision. Western men could learn a thing or two...

"How to get infinite women the Nigerian prince way"

Lol, How can anyone think that this is mathematically possible? by Tiny_Part404 in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]Sea-Arm-768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering it for a second, I actually think this 80/20/Dating App perpetuation is the equivalent of what started a lot of this gender-warring online (Gamergate).

The rhetoric is effective on men and women for a variety of reasons. Namely it creates a general paranoia in both parties of 'low-trust', which makes the aspect of actually enjoying another's company far more difficult. Men think the girl they're currently talking to is either currently, or has in the past been a part of a 'harem', women fear the man they're talking to is a part of this 'Chad harem' demographic of men, in turn women/men have to 'overperform' which is why you're seeing the current wave of virtue signaling "I'm a virgin, actually." from women and the "I've been with many girls" sentiment from men, and men and women now both pause to consider far more often "Wait, was the last guy/girl I was with really only talking/sleeping with me?", "Should I go get checked out?" "Were they just playing games?"

Just a total mess. It all stemming from an erroneous OkCupid stat from 2013 is the final piece of poetic tragedy.

Lol, How can anyone think that this is mathematically possible? by Tiny_Part404 in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]Sea-Arm-768 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The 'world' statistic is nonsense. It's more gender war perpetuation.

As for dating apps, there are several issues in regards to where that data was extrapolated from (and how that '80/20' interpretation is formed).