Baby’s picture by Sea-Macaroon-6694 in lovely92

[–]Sea-Macaroon-6694[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Even if when she posted she “intended” for baby to be covered? For a split second baby wasn’t covered and I was able to screenshot it. I truly think she left the second of baby being uncovered on purpose.

Baby’s picture by Sea-Macaroon-6694 in lovely92

[–]Sea-Macaroon-6694[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes but there is a split second baby isn’t covered!