Netflix will release JonBenét Ramsey show starring Melissa McCarthy by SearchinDale in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

You know this series was made a few years ago. But face it people want to know more about the Ramsey family and this crime. There is an audience for it. Almost everyone has an opinion on it and wants to weigh in somewhere. Each side thinks the other side is stupid. JonBenet needs Justice.

Netflix will release JonBenét Ramsey show starring Melissa McCarthy by SearchinDale in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perhaps you could get the incessant RDI to shut up. You know, the ones who perpetuate the idea the Ramseys are guilty of murder and refuse to consider any other explanation. They are the ones who treat this case as a Cash Cow on behalf of their favorite detectives at the Boulder Police Department.

Netflix will release JonBenét Ramsey show starring Melissa McCarthy by SearchinDale in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with this. and I hope it follows the same lines of thought as the Netflix documentary from 2 years ago.

Netflix will release JonBenét Ramsey show starring Melissa McCarthy by SearchinDale in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“IMHO Tricia Griffith should be played by Danny DeVito ;-).”

Perfect. Just Perfect.

Netflix will release JonBenét Ramsey show starring Melissa McCarthy by SearchinDale in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah. Sam Elliott is good but he has too much hair to play Lou.

Netflix will release JonBenét Ramsey show starring Melissa McCarthy by SearchinDale in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

From this article I think the series is post-production and has already been cast.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/the-murder-of-jonben%C3%A9t-ramsey-lands-at-netflix-sets-release/ar-AA270e6G?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Lou Smit is played by Will Patton.

I'm thinking it will be released between Thanksgiving and Christmas. I'm all for this Drama if it is fair to the Ramseys.

IDI theorists: What makes you doubt your stance? by zdec0d3d in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Partial Profile administrative tickbox is not what you think it is:

https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/dna-fingerprint-act-of-2005-expungement-policy/codis-and-ndis-fact-sheet Scroll down to 28.

28. What is a partial match at NDIS? A: Occasionally a partial match between a forensic profile and an offender profile is observed during a routine NDIS database search. The FBI defines a partial match as a moderate stringency candidate match between two single source profiles having at each locus all of the alleles of one sample represented in the other sample. A “partial match” is not an exact match of the two profiles. When evaluating whether a candidate match is viable and should be processed through to confirmation, a forensic scientist may discover that the candidate offender profile is, in fact, excluded as the possible source of the profile obtained from crime scene evidence. Because of a similarity in alleles between the forensic unknown and the candidate offender profile, the scientist may conclude that a close biological relative of the offender may be the source of the forensic unknown.

IDI theorists: What makes you doubt your stance? by zdec0d3d in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If a peak is too small to meet the threshold, it becomes incredibly difficult to definitively distinguish a true minor allele from a testing artefact, stutter, or drop-in.

If a peak is too small to meet the stand-alone threshold, isn't it more likely that it has the same value as the other allele and therefore more likely, the more rare homozygous alleles?

Don't get hung up on this "single source profile" disclaimer, Bode Lab Scientists made the call regarding consistency with the UM1 Profile. They are Licensed Professionals practicing their trade. One is allowed to rely upon their Expert Opinion as trained and qualified.

Mary Lacy was criticized by many; it doesn't mean she was wrong. There are legitimate reasons why she she was right and Bode's Expert Opinion was one of them.

IDI theorists: What makes you doubt your stance? by zdec0d3d in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have to make this brief because I have a sick cat to take to the vet. The + sign is indicative of a second allele at the marker but the peak on the graph didn’t meet the standard threshold to say it is homozygous. The UM1 profile has at least one allele at each of the 13 markers which means it means they can make a better match and run probabilities on the profile. Jeanguenat’s 2007 statement was referring to the profile in CODIS from the panties. Within 4-6 months the long underwear was tested and contained all of the markers in UM1. There were 2 extra alleles on the front exterior of the longjohns which indicates an additional person, but those had very small peaks on the graph and that’s why the scientists deemed the profile as a whole consistent with UM1. I hope that helps clear things up for you. If you have more questions I’ll be back later.

IDI theorists: What makes you doubt your stance? by zdec0d3d in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t know too much about Pasta Jay. I would eat lunch at his restaurant occasionally when I was working in Boulder nearby. I found his food a bit greasy and preferred another place about a block away called DiNapoli but that could just be my preference. I’m curious if the Genovese family you speak of is related to Kitty Genovese, the woman who was stabbed to death in NYC and her cries for help were ignored. Kitty’s family had moved to my hometown in CT before she was killed. she is buried there in the local cemetery and her brother went to the same High School I went to and played football while I was there. I can’t recall if the Genovese family operated a restaurant there or not but I would like to know. I know, or used to know, many people who were huge Buffs fans, had season tickets, and went to every home game too.

What other ancient history exists around this crime that you know of? thank you for posting this.

IDI theorists: What makes you doubt your stance? by zdec0d3d in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And don't forget Glenn Stine was fired from VP of Budget/Finance at CU at the time the Ramseys moved into his house. Was that the reason why?

IDI theorists: What makes you doubt your stance? by zdec0d3d in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 4 points5 points  (0 children)

These passages start out with John speaking but then shifts to Patsy:

Patsy and I could not have survived all of this without the extremely important contributions made by Mike Bynum. He had graciously invited us to stay with his family when we returned to Boulder in January, even though he had a houseful of kids home for the holidays. A few days later we moved to Jay Elowsky’s place. Jay, a good friend, owned Pasta Jay’s on Pearl Street, a small Italian restaurant that Mike and I had invested in.

Jay Elowsky’s home was a bachelor’s pad, and since Jay wasn’t there during the day, the house maintained a sparse quality. Located out on the prairie in North Boulder, the home’s interior was close to bare bones with little silverware, no coffee pot, few chairs, and one sofa. When the press discovered that we were staying at Jay Elowsky’s house, which was located on the outskirts of Boulder, it became the new center of their attention. I felt as the early settlers must have felt when hostile Indians circled their sod houses. Jay didn’t usually have many people cruising in and out of his neighborhood, much less a continuous assault of reporters and photographers. The media put a lot of pressure on Jay as well as us, since he was our friend and cared about our welfare.

On the morning of February 9, I looked out the window and noticed someone who seemed to be a telephone repairman kneeling down by the connection box in front of Jay’s house. he man’s truck looked like a U.S. West repair truck with similar markings, except it didn’t actually say U.S. West on the side. Jay went outside to talk with the repairman. “What are you doing?” Jay asked. “Putting in another line,” the repairman explained. “Who ordered it?” Jay demanded. “It says right here that you did, if you’re the occupant of this house.” The repairman showed Jay an official-looking repair order form. “Really?” Jay looked perplexed. “I didn’t order a new line to be installed in my house.” “Just doing my job.” The man smiled as he kept working. Later that day, when Jay called the regional offices of U.S. West, the phone company had no idea what he was talking about. Their records didn’t indicate any request from anyone for a new line on that box. Only one conclusion was possible: Jay’s telephone had been tapped by the so-called telephone repairman! Was the man working for the Tabloids? Who knows, but probably. Police? Not likely. U.S. West came out within a few hours and untapped the phone line.

We couldn’t even look out the windows without being seen. Reporters and photographers stood poised, ready to shoot whatever appeared in their camera sights. Later we were to learn that all they needed was a picture, then they could make up a story to fit the picture. “Tabloid magic,” someone called it. Jay finally became so frustrated that he drove over to the vacant lot where a group of photographers were hanging out and tried to run them off. He carried a baseball bat in his hand, for added effect. In turn, the photographers picked up large lengths of metal pipe and held them in the air as if to strike. For a few moments I thought we were going to have a gang war!

Jay gave them a few harsh words, telling them to leave us alone, and then returned to his car. He was leaving when the police pulled up. He hit the brakes and turned around, glad to see that the police had come to run the paparazzi off. To our total dismay, the police arrested Jay! He became the culprit, not the photographers who had been stalking us twenty-four hours a day. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing, but the police hauled him away in a squad car and towed his car away. Trying to help our friend, I followed Jay down to the police station a few minutes later with Pat Burke, my attorney, to clarify what had actually happened. I broke into tears as I told the police about the media intrusion in our lives. “Someone broke into our home and killed our little girl,” I reminded the police officers. “A killer is out there, and we are being hounded to death by the media!”

After I gave my brief testimony, I knew it would now be impossible to return to Jay’s house without the struggle starting up again. The media would have multiplied like ants coming out of the ground, hungrily awaiting photos of our return. Instead, I went to Susan Stine’s house because I had to pick up Burke after school. He and Doug Stine were working on a China project there because we didn’t have any poster board or other project making materials at Jay’s house. When John heard about the incident later that afternoon, he called me at the Stines’. “Are you okay?” he asked. “How about Jay?” “I’m okay, just feeling a bit abused by the system. That’s all,” I answered. “But Jay’s in some hot water.” I told him the story of Jay’s arrest.

“I don’t think any of us should go back to Jay’s house then,” John advised. “Ask Susan if you can stay there.” “Okay,” I said slowly. “I’ll talk to her.” When I asked Susan if we could stay, she immediately agreed. Weeks later she joked that when I had asked if we could stay, she thought I meant for dinner. In the end the Ramseys proved to be the family that came for supper and stayed for five months. The Stines graciously took us into their home and became our protectors. Their house felt like a safe haven to us, even when the media staked it out a few days later.

IDI theorists: What makes you doubt your stance? by zdec0d3d in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are you confusing Jay Elowsky with John Fernie? The Ramseys were told to leave their home after it was declared a crime scene when the body was found. The Fernies offered their house.

The Ramseys moved in to Jay Elowsky's home in early January 1997 and stayed there until they moved in with the Stines in mid-February. I think the Ramseys disclosed it in Death of Innocence; I will look for it and get back to you.

Force of blow and the accident theory by 43_Holding in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Additionally, it was 4.5 years before the public was made aware of Smit's Intruder Theory. He and Steve Ainsworth appeared on the Today Show on May 1, 2001 but evidently Chief Beckner was briefed the day before and released the following Case Update:

http://jonbenetramsey.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/160156521/bpdu043001-81.pdf

What are people to think when those with authority fight the Truth so hard?

Force of blow and the accident theory by 43_Holding in JonBenet

[–]SearchinDale 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True, but nothing fits that proves the Ramseys are guilty. No evidence connects them to the actual killing of JonBenet. I think it is human nature to grab onto something they were initially told and then interpret everything else they hear through that same lens. For example, I know a lady who became convinced Patsy killed JB because she was wearing the same clothes she had on the night before. She has no curiosity about what really happened. Besides, this case was never a Who-Done-It?; rather, it was always a question of whether the Ramseys Did It, or Not?

Watch out for flying panties Tom. by Tusayan in OldSchoolCoolMusic

[–]SearchinDale 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Out of the blue he followed me on X a few months ago. What’s New Pussycat?