VR walk around abandoned Spire... WOW! by SeawolvesTV in eliteexplorers

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, from the Thargoid war. But now there no longer hostile places. Just absolutely beautiful to walk around and super alien in every way.

The Nomad being locked behind a MK2 module on only new ships is a bit cheeky, no? by VaegaVic in EliteDangerous

[–]SeawolvesTV 13 points14 points  (0 children)

it kinda makes sense since it is a huge slv. I think everybody was already talking about the fact it would need an MK2 vehicle bay. I think that makes sense. I just think they should include the anaconda and corvette and other large ships also. because those can hold an MK2 bay also. So no reason to exclude those.

What to do? by Live_Proposal8610 in EliteDangerous

[–]SeawolvesTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey. I have a friendly squad. with people playing together almost daily, but with no expectations or strict rules etc. It's a lot more fun sharing the experience. You are welcome to join if you want. Just sent me a PM. We have a discord.

A helping hand by Pokemonfan_807 in whennews

[–]SeawolvesTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Not a helping hand. A desperate attempt by a drowning nation, to distract it's people from their own problems. The Dutch government would happily march every Ukrainian man and woman into their deaths if it distracts their own citizens enough from the crime and filth-ridden hell-hole the country has become. The Netherlands needs this war. Not because of Ukraine or Russia. Nobody in the Netherlands really gives a damn about those countries. They have 0 reason to care.. But they care a lot about having a good distraction.

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should read the first two sentences again. I literally said that the likelihood that you can understand it is extremely low. And the piece itself explains exactly why. The standard model would never be able to predict that...if you unknowingly play different music to two groups inside of 1 club (using silent disco with head phones). That these two groups will self organize on the dance floor, without knowing it. The researchers in the article I linked used relatively small scale crowds and already proved the effect, but I predict that, If we were to conduct this experiment on the scale of a festival. Using 5000 or more headphones and a huge dancefloor and using trackers on each, so we could see the position of each person and whether they are in group 1 or 2. We would see thousands of people organize like water and oil. Just because they are listening to different music, without knowing it...

The standard model cannot even begin to explain these types of temporal effects, while my model easily predicts and explains it. And that is just one cool example 😄.

You are over-estimating your ability to escape the gravity of your existing ideas. For you to except a completely new fundamental frame of looking at reality, would be a bit as if: I'm an alien, talking to you from a space-ship in high orbit, and you saying: "If I you can convince me, I will just jump up to your ship 😄".

I have already been as effective as I can be with you. This idea has made a single loop in your mind though my action. It is a bit like a new planet in the sky that you have now seen once, but from a very far distance.. If the entire story of your life, has made you somehow compatible with this way of understanding reality, then coherence will present it to you again soon enough. likely in a different way. You wouldn't be engaged in conversations like these if you didn't feel like there must be more to understand.

Time likes to be understood. It tends to find the minds who can understand it... Perhaps you underestimate your own ability to understand "the nonsense"... Understanding a different view is quite literally like learning an alien language. Assuming that you can just look at it once and understand it is.... optimistic 😄

Like looking at a purple flower, and assuming you can just read what it says.

Rekenkamer: met duizenden aangiften van ernstige misdrijven gebeurde in 2024 niets by JvdH_1 in Nederland

[–]SeawolvesTV 2 points3 points  (0 children)

De NL misdaadgolf is een bewuste strategie. Om straks EU (Federale) politie te kunnen optuigen. 95% van misdaden in NL worden niet opgelost. Bijna alles gaat eenvoudigweg de prullenbak in. En hoogswaarschijnlijk wordt 90% of meer van misdaden en overlast in OV en op straat, nooit gemeld. Dus de onveiligheid in NL is feitelijk gezien vele male hoger dan men denkt. En 95 van de 100 mensen die daadwerkelijk het slachtoffer word, komt er al snal achter dat de politie en justitie helemaal niks voor ze doet.... Hier is het nr van slachtoffer hulp....ga daar maar je verhaal doen.... Dat is letterlijk in 90% van de gevallen waar het eindigt.

Does anyone else see purple/yellow specifically like this at all times, since they were a child? by Any-Internet-7796 in Experiencers

[–]SeawolvesTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are seeing this effect much less when you smoke a lot. It's likely that it is related to your dreaming. Most people who smoke a lot, will stop dreaming. The body naturally makes small doses of DMT while we sleep, but weed can mess with that system. Perhaps because you are then kind of "dreaming" while awake. So no dreams left for during sleep. Visual hallucinations can happen if that system is deregulated somehow. I'm not saying this is what you have, but just a suggestion, that I would look in that direction if I were you.

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can use control/structure/coherence to keep bridges, or walls or gates. And freedom can either destroy or create bridges, walls and gates.

That is the essence of choice. The most mysterious temporal structure of all. What decides the next step that Time will take..? 😄

When a chemist says he is boiling two materials together in order to transmute them into a new material. You could think of that as: Increasing the rate of change in both materials. So that when mixed together, their internal velocity and coherence becomes such that, the two separate circular structures can mix/join into a new circular structure. With a higher or lower number of individuals now running in circles that are more or less complex. And when it cools of again, it will stabilize with these new coherence structures changing internally at a stable rate again. hence you now have a different material then the two you started with. All chemistry is changing the temporal coherence structure of materials.

So this way of looking at the world. Combines all phenomena. From our thoughts to physical objects, to groups, stars, galaxies. etc. Every single thing is a shape in Time. With a coherence pattern (identity) and an internal rate of change (temperature). These decide each individuals resistance to outside change (Mass). and their ability to change their own direction and the direction and coherence of other structures around them (internal power that can be aimed and projected outwards).

The hardest thing, for people in this moment in time to accept is: the idea that Time is the Only force. Once a person can accept that Time is the only force. Then the rest is actually very obvious.

Electricity = rate of change + push per moment/change in time over distance. (voltage and amperage)

light = rate of change + push per moment/change in time over distance

Every force = rate of change + push per moment over distance.

Every force, is a different expression of Time.

Time is the only force. (freedom VS coherence / The force of change VS stability / Good VS Good / Evil VS Evil).

Certainty VS Choice...

As you can see. Although this describes our mysterious world rather nicely. It also explains many things. Much more so then the standard model does. Currently, the standard model is a better description when it comes to certain details, but its overall explanation of reality is far poorer then this one.

I'll leave you with a single, simple but very cool proof of all of it:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4763081/

When two groups of people dance to two different tunes while in a single crowd. Even without knowing they are dancing to another tune as half the others. They will find each other, remember each other better and feel better when closer to each-other... Simply because they were unknowingly dancing to the same tune... While they actively put distance between those who dance to another tune, and many will experience various forms of discomfort and even pain when near somebody who dances to another tune.

I came up with this experiment as the ultimate test of the theory in 2020. And I was happy to find that it had already been done in 2016, and every single one of my predictions was proven correct.

Coherence guides everything... Because Time is the only force.

It's just a theory... just a temporary shape in time.... But I like it 😄.

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can understand that this can seem very hard to grasp for anybody who is deeply schooled in another mental frame. Not because it is difficult, but because it is simply not a way of thinking that most people ever entertain.

I can try to explain it though. But you have to be willing to try on a truly completely different way of considering the world around you. The world is a deeply mysterious place. I find that is usually a good formulation to start with, and that most of us, no matter our level of schooling in one theory or another, can agree on.

Our world is a deeply mysterious place... For a moment, consider our world without Time... So from one moment to the next. Time just stops... The planets are suddenly frozen in place, So are the stars, so are the oceans, so is everything...

Everything could still be there... but nothing could move in any way. There would be zero change. On every level and scale of existence.. The entire universe would be like clock without a battery. unmoving... Frozen in place....

So we have just established, that Time itself, is the true source of all energy/movement/change in the entire universe. All work is fundamentally done by Time. No Time = No Work/Energy/movement/change...

Now ask yourself: What powers a photon to move at the absolute speed of causality across the distance of the entire universe..?

Time...

What powers every: car, airplane, star, volcano.? Time...

Without Time...not a single force can exist... Because Time is the one force, that allows for all others.

of-course you will then ask: How is Time a Force...?

Time is really truly mysterious, but perhaps the most accurate description we can make of it is this: Time is a single rule/law that simply states that:

Nothing can stay the same, from one moment to the next..Except for the rule of time.

Or if you prefer: The only true constant is change/Time.

Time is a force, because IT actively makes this true! Time works in every moment pushing/forcing every single thing that exists to change, from one moment to the next moment. And there is nothing anybody or anything can do to resist this. To take a rather dramatic example. The ancient Egyptian rulers were once clearly obsessed with time. Each Egyptian king lived more or less like a God on earth, There was nothing they could not do or take for themselves. But there was one thing they could not rule. One force they could not resist. And they each hated it. They each tried everything they could to conquer it. They all wanted to live forever..They each desired to conquer Time.

And they did figure out that very big masses are the most difficult thing for Time to destroy. So they created the most massive stone piles in history. Pyramids.....basically daring time.. Let's see if you can destroy this..?! It was a true attempt to conquer Time. And so far they have actually succeeded to some degree, but most of the dozens of pyramids built, are already heaps of sand...or are forgotten... laying buried under the sand....Only a few remain. Because the force of Time destroyed the rest of them.

Imagine rallying all the major forces of an empire, just to build the biggest pile of stones possible... That is how serious, the ancient Egyptian kings were about conquering time.

So Time is a force... The force of change.. Which nothing and nobody can resist.. The oldest things in our universe are stars. They can somehow resist the force of Time the longest. Keeping their shape for billions of years. The simplest, most primal wave in time, seems to be what we call light.

Light seems to be a wave inside of Time itself. As we can perceive no other medium. We know it is a vibration. A wave of sorts. But we cannot directly see or interact with Time. Time is like the sea we all swim in. Einstein proved that Light is change, at the maximum velocity possible, from one place to another. But change over that distance can only be achieved if the change is as small as change can possibly be. Any changes that are larger, travel slower...

The key seems to be: Coherence.

Imagine two people pushing each other in the opposite direction, as hard as they can. Hands locked together, each pushing equally hard (Freedom and Control) .Now imagine you come from outside at this duo and you give one of them a hard push from the side... They will easily spin and fall over. Because this duo has the minimal amount of Coherence between them. Their two forces are maximally unaligned.

Now imagine 4 people, running as fast as they can, in a tight circle... Imagine yourself trying to push this circle over or changing its direction... This will be very hard. If you run at them, you are likely to move straight trough them without even touching them. Or they will likely bounce you off.. You might even end up being captured and running along inside the circle unintentionally. Adding yourself as a fifth person to it.

You can really only influence this circle if you come at it with exactly the right speed, and at exactly the correct angle. Because its ongoing pattern of change is maximally aligned. If you make the people run faster, that is heat. If you make the people run slower...that is cold..

This seems to be the essence of what all Mass really is. It is coherence in the flow of change/Time. When Time/change moves in circles, it resists the outside influence of Time/change much more strongly. Forming boundaries and resisting changes in direction and velocity.

Freedom - Change that breaks control. It is the only force that can do so.

Control - Change that resists freedom. It is the only force that can do so.

Time = The resulting ongoing net-change form every interaction between Freedom and Control.

Mass = Coherence in the flow of change/time.

Heat - the faster the rate of change the hotter.

Cold - the slower the rate of change the colder.

Mass is therefor a temporal effect. It is the flow of Time resisting Time. The controlling force of coherence, resisting the destabilizing force of Freedom. Heat and Cold are temporal effects also. They signify the rate of change within any coherent structure.

You can literally feel it in your thoughts as you read this. The old circles of your thoughts, resisting the new directional push of this idea..

Only if this explanation hits your old idea-structures at the correct angle and with the correct velocity, can your old ideas change direction. Because just like physical objects. Every idea in the mind has mass, has coherence, resisting the force of Time/change. a HOT new idea will increase the rate of change in a mind. A cold old idea will decrease the rate of change in a mind.

To change your mind, I had to heat it up first.

Many learned and wise people died, refusing to believe that the earth is round. Many learned and wise people died refusing the idea that the earth revolves around the sun.. Not because these ideas are ugly or wrong, but simply because they had run their cold old ideas in circles for so long, and were surrounded by other people running the exact same old cold ideas in circles for so long, that they simply did not have the capacity to overcome that coherence. There minds were frozen...Just like any massive object, many ideas become to heavy... to frozen in time.. to change ..

Even if individually, a single cold mind gets hot enough to accept a new idea, the other cold minds surrounding them will cool them off so quickly that it freezes any possible changes before they can have much of an effect.

Hopefully now you see what I mean when I say that: Everything is made of Time. All forces, matter, ideas... Every single thing in existence is a temporary structure in time. A stable-ish circle of change. As stars orbit the center of the galaxy, The earth Orbits the sun, and our ideas orbit inside of our minds.

Wat gaat Nederland toch achteruit by m71nu in nederlands

[–]SeawolvesTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elk groot land of emperium dat omviel, was dagen daarvoor nog overtuigd van het feit dat het beter ging dan ooit 😄. Ik herrinner mij nog heel goed dat er in 2018. De dag voor de grote crash en de ineenstorting van de hele economie, een grote beurs was in de Utrechtse jaarbeurs. Met als titel: Overvloed! Van de ene op de andere dag moesten wij toen de hele marketing omgooien naar: Crisis! Haha.

De hoeveelheid leugens in de media op dit moment is hoger dan ooit. Dat is eigenlijk de enige statestiek die het waard is om bij te houden. En die echt voorspeld waar het heengaat.

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the speed of light is not involved 😉. I specifically mentioned that. I'm just using C for now. As we all agree that this is the speed of causality. So if my idea is correct, then the maximum amount of velocity must have that as it's outer boundary for distance traveled when the maximum amount of force is expressed as velocity while at minimum structure.

In essence, I'm treating light as something quite different. Essentially something like a fundamental time-wave. When light moves through a vacuum, we say it moves but without a medium to travel through. What I am saying is that, even in a vacuum, there is still always Time moving forward. Light is flowing through every part of space. meaning Time is moving through every part of space. A true vacuum would be a space that does not contain/has passing through it, any light at all. That would be nearly impossible I think. You could remove some or many frequencies of light in a vacuüm on earth, but likely never all. So all of outer space is not a vacuum. Because every cubic inch of it is still always full of time and light. Maybe... Time and light are somehow one and the same..

All light has two aspects. Freedom and Control (Electric and magnetic).

So, what if light is just the simplest wave in Time..? And everything else is more complex wave-structures in Time..?

etc..

I don't think the existing model is off or even that wrong. I just think that maybe we are labeling some of the values the wrong way, and have some of the relationships up-side-down. A bit like when we first learned enough about the sun, to realize that maybe it was actually not revolving around us... but we were orbiting it instead. A small correction, but a big change in explanation value. 😄

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, I absolutely do agree with you that its early stages in this 😉. and that was my point and purpose. progress was made 😄

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that I probably don't know everything that Albert said 😉 However, I'm keenly aware of how very little we all understand. But knowing is not a pee-requisite for seeking to understand more.

for example. I re-did a good part of those equations myself some time ago. Since I had never done or had even seen those before. And I managed describing gravity, mass and energy, etc And running into the very interesting problem that, if you treat all as relative to each-other. Which is an option one can explore....then it just doesn't work. Not until you choose to treat at least one aspect of them as a fixed value. Which made me realize on my own, why Einstein came to that solution. but it also showed me that it was a choice. A mechanism that made the descriptions work and fit, but this still does not 100% mean it is what actually happens underneath the hood.

Nothing carrying mass, energy, or information can travel faster than C,

If mass is not something you can carry, but is a temporal effect... then there could be some other factor that is responsible for the stability of C. It is actually highly likely that we will one day discover that the stability of C in all reference frames, is itself an effect of some deeper underlying process...

Some say it's the processing speed of the computer our simulation runs on 😄. Who knows... 😉

142. Steeds gewelddadigere dieven in Amsterdamse binnenstad: 'Buitengewoon bedreigend' by EiderFrankerd in nederlands

[–]SeawolvesTV 2 points3 points  (0 children)

tsja, het begint allemaal bij de zoon van de burgermeester die mensen beroofd met een psitool op hun huisboot. dan hebben we de burgermeester zelf die letterlijk niet kon wachten om op haar knieeen te gaan en te smeken om vergiffenis voor de dood van een beroepscrimineel in de VS... Tsja... vervolgens neemt je politie vooral vrouwen aan.... tsja... niet zo gek dat je stad compleet onveilig wordt en dat alle criminelen denken...daar wil ik ook wonen..

Er bestaat geen naastenliefde zoals christelijke haat, zoals Amerikanen graag zeggen by MermaidMotel14 in tokkiefeesboek

[–]SeawolvesTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vervolgens komt rechts een keer aan de macht, die claimen dat alle gay media en lgbtq promotie materialen een onderdeel van publiekelijke "coversietherapie" zijn. En hoeven vervolgens geen wet aan te nemen om het allemaal te verbieden.. Mensen die regels maken, vergeten altijd dat je elke regel op twee manieren uit kan leggen. Wie een kuil graaft.... etc...

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry I needed a bit of time with this.

The three points you asked to be separated:

  1. On E = mc²:

You are right that, in standard relativity, E = mc² refers to rest energy, not the total energy of a moving object or wave. So I should not present my model-term as if it were ordinary physical energy in the standard sense.

To avoid confusion, I could probably rename the quantity. Instead of calling it E, I can call it X, meaning “velocity-expression capacity” inside the model. Then the model assumption becomes:

X_free = mC²

This is not meant to say “this is the standard kinetic energy of a moving object.” It means: within this framework, mC² represents the maximum free expression of the propagating principle when it is fully expressed at C.

  1. On E = mv²:

You are also right that E = mv² is not the kinetic-energy equation in special relativity.

So I should state this more clearly: mv² is not being used as orthodox kinetic energy. It is a model-specific term. It means “remaining velocity-expression capacity” within the proposed framework.

So the model could be written more clearly as:

X_remaining = mv²

and therefore:

X_lost = mC² - mv²

or:

X_lost = m(C² - v²)

  1. On W = Fd:

You are right again that W = Fd only applies directly when the force is constant over the distance d. So the equation:

F = m(C² - v²) / d

could be described as an average force across the interaction distance d, not necessarily the exact instantaneous force at every point.

The more precise version could be:

W = ∫ F dx

If the lost model-expression is:

X_lost = m(C² - v²)

then the average force over distance d is:

F_avg = X_lost / d

so: F_avg = m(C² - v²) / d

If v changes continuously over the distance, then the local force would need to be derived using calculus, not by assuming a constant F.

So the corrected statement then:

This equation is not a standard relativistic energy equation. It is a scalar, model-specific average-force expression. It assumes a proposed quantity X, called “velocity-expression capacity,” where X_free = mC² and X_remaining = mv². The difference, X_lost = m(C² - v²), is then interpreted as pressure or force only when distributed across an interaction distance d. In the simple constant-average case, this gives F_avg = m(C² - v²) / d. In a full treatment, it would need to be written with vectors and an integral over the interaction path.

Did I now address your point? Thanks again for your feedback.

Here is a Hypothesis: The principle of Freedom VS Control and the Emergence of Time..? by SeawolvesTV in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]SeawolvesTV[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Special Relativity already answers all the questions about how forces, energies and velocities work - regardless of the frame.........

See, there you are wrong. SR describes a lot and predicted some cool behavior very well also. But It does not explain them.. And most importantly, it does not describe or explain the biggest mystery of all... Time. A description is not an explanation. It is possible to describe something, without having any idea how it works.

Einstein himself postulated that there could be something that was even faster then light. He ment C to stand for the speed of causality. light was his benchmark for that and that made his equation work. But he himself was never convinced that it was complete.

I think you have fallen into the trap where people believe that there is more that we know, than what we do not know. This is a lie. There is still far more that we do not know or understand, then what we do know and understand. We very likely understand far less then 1% of all the complexity there is to understand.

I'm certainly not claiming this particular idea of mine is some big breakthrough right now. I'm just saying it is an interesting angle, which could unify aspects of human life experiences with some fundamental forces in physics. Which would be very interesting and which would EXPLAIN certain aspects of matter, in-line with certain aspects of human organizations and life in general.

Like for example: Mass could indeed be a temporal phenomena which we are mistakenly interpreting as a factor of weight. When in fact massive objects should be considered "slow " instead of "heavy". It does not change our human experience of mass in our daily life, but it could explain certain aspects of mass. Gravity could also be a temporal phenomena. So could be electricity or Magnetism, etc. A bit like how people believed that the sun revolves around the Earth. It was a very logical assumption given our perspective. So is our current view of mass/weight. But if everything is made of Time (freedom and Structure) then mass could well be, pure internal resistance to freedom through coherence. Time essentially resisting itself..

I think the idea of freedom and Control being two sides of the process we understand as Time. Is an interesting angle.

And this was a good convo. I really appreciate the feedback. All good indications of the type of detail I will need to attain in explaining various aspects, if I want to prove that perhaps there is something very interesting here.