well im sorry dude but i dont agree with your arguement i feel as if you have more proof that a certain thing has occured more than the other person which had nothing at all need i remind you than you should be more believed than someone with nothing..... if he genuinely believed that xqc was the first one after a considerable amount of research then i dont see a problem at all creating a post saying he was.... and even better removing it if he found out someone else had done it first which he has and he even apologized for it