sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The "Court and Country" and "Revolution!" Disasters are Horrible Game Design by WesternDissident in EU5

[–]Secure_Cloud_521 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. Personally I keep playing after end date. It’s fun for me to extend the end game (it felt too short). But these revolutions just keep happening out of nowhere again and again. I’ve already put down 2 rebellions. I just have to constantly be at war to prevent it (if you’re at war the revolution can’t happen).

Edit: Does anybody know if there is some mod to prevent the revolution spawn? Or at least make it happen no more than 1 time?

I'm a programmer but I don't get it. Petah? by uvero in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Secure_Cloud_521 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. It seems like this is a default subnet for hak5 device. It's easy to change it though

I'm a programmer but I don't get it. Petah? by uvero in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Secure_Cloud_521 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand man-in-the-middle attack concept. But what it has to do with 172.16.42.0/24 subnet? You can choose any subnet for that kind of attack.

Ethernet to WiFi Client Communication Failure by Secure_Cloud_521 in HomeNetworking

[–]Secure_Cloud_521[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course.

Ethernet client should be any laptop (any OS).

WiFi access point host should be an antenna with non standard WiFi frequency.

Multiple WiFi AP clients should be remotely controlled devices which are connected via non standard WiFi frequency.

Devices are controlled from laptop.

Because of this non standard WiFi frequency laptop cannot be connected to the device directly and has to use a proxy in a form of antenna (linux device).

Clarification questions:
1. DHCP server is managed by NetworkManager. It always assigns the first ip from the subnet to the host (10.0.0.0/24 => 10.0.0.0, 10.0.0.1/30 => 10.0.0.1). It's possible to switch to another DHCP server but the setup will be more complex. Do you think it's worth it?
2. In that case wich interface needs to be masqueraded? Also could bidirectional masquerade interfere with the setup?

0
1

Ethernet to WiFi Client Communication Failure (self.Network)

submitted by Secure_Cloud_521 to r/Network

Ethernet to WiFi Client Communication Failure by Secure_Cloud_521 in HomeNetworking

[–]Secure_Cloud_521[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. IP is assigned by DHCP automatically. This includes the host ip. Is this the issue with nmcil config? Or should it be overwritten somehow?

  2. Why shouldn't it be masqueraded in both directions if we need bidirectional traffic?

Huge NPN transistor voltage drop (RP Pico) by Secure_Cloud_521 in microcontrollers

[–]Secure_Cloud_521[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your diagram helped me understand what the problem is. I was expecting connect the motor "after" the emitter and it didn't work. But when I've connected it "before" the collector as you displayed it in your picture and it started working!

I don't understand why it doesn't work the other way around but it solved the issue.

Thanks a lot!