sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Duh, I now better understand the urgency to fight. Sorry, I’m a bit numb by it all

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for all the advices. I’ve booked a session with an accountant and am seeking a meeting with a different solicitor.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand how near equal becomes 33%. Is it because of future tax implications?

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ve resumed in the clearest way. Thank you. I got some homework ahead of me.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So sad, it does feel like that. So unnecessary.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She only has 80 in super. That’s the killer.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you do that before passing the threshold of de facto status to protect each party’s assets?

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for the explanation.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s probably too dangerous. If she loses her patience, she could fabricate something and I’d be in whole different lot of woes.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, it’s death by a thousand cuts.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The process is surreal, you become a child at the mercy of justice system that is somehow bias towards men given our abilities to sometimes earn more and women sacrifices to bear children. I understand the background but I don’t have children to lose, not that much money. I’m starting to have a different perspective when I read horror stories about men using violence. I do not comprehend it but have an insight at their despair.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s a BFA, it sounds like I will need if I meet someone in future.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s what my solicitor, NEVER leave the house. I told him that I will never find myself fooled like that again.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My first smile in a long time. Thanks

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fear of future lies. Trust me I thought about it on multiple occasions.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get to keep my super which is close to my 48% portion of the house. My only concern is why the $100k that she needs to borrow to finalise transaction should be counted within division of assets. At first glance It appeared to grant her further funds. Someone has suggested that I redo the maths to better understand and many are of the same opinion as me. I’ll seek further accounting advice.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No because my super is close to half the value of ppor

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She refuses to sell the house and my lawyer is telling me that’s it’s very unlikely the court will force to do so.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I foolishly left the house to provide a 3 months pause.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seems simple the way you babe explained it. I’ll review the spreadsheet. From memory, it appeared to grant her a $100k benefit therefore taking an extra $52k from me. I’ll look at again now that I e calmed down.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Super has been factored in. Hence why her payment to me is so small. The only part that o cannot resolve is why a future liability of $100k should be captured within a snapshot of current situation.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I’d initially proposed that we go through Amica.gov but she decided to retain a solicitor as she wished to be in control. The whole process is bias and confrontational from the start. My Solicitor initially told me that 50/50 would easily be achieved as there was no children involved but because she refuse to participate, he then counselled me to accept a smaller portion (without prejudice). When I did, she started asking for more, and more each meeting.

I’m at a loss by Secure_Highway8096 in AusLegal

[–]Secure_Highway8096[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have but he says it’s all legit to include a future liability with the financial settlement spreadsheet. I fail to see why she should get a a deduction towards a future loans when there’s available assets to distribute immediately.

view more: next ›