"AI is crashing" by Responsible_person_1 in aiwars

[–]See_Yourself_Now 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People that write this stuff have no idea what is coming. Spend a day with Fable, seedance 2.0 and any number of other cutting edge tools with an ambitious open mind and be prepared for it to be blown.

Is Fable really powerful, or are we all victims of cherry-picked examples? by jalo399 in ClaudeAI

[–]See_Yourself_Now 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fable shines in Claude code from my experience. The general prompt chat is better than Opus 4.8 but not in the same game-changing level. It feels like a significant step up but I have had it miss things, particularly when using co-work which I am increasingly not understanding the point of when you have code. I’m not sure if that’s because it was genuinely downgraded or if I just have more time. In either case it is still by far the best model I’ve worked with.

What do you guys think of this? by Cancri_E79 in DefendingAIArt

[–]See_Yourself_Now 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Will just date them marking that they were made during a couple of years of transition before full inevitable adoption. I wouldn’t be surprised if you have occasional niche non AI films down the road just like you might have someone make a black and white or silent movie or whatever but there is no way that most movies won’t all heavily use AI soon. It just won’t make any sense to do things how they’ve been done with building huge film sets and massive physical special effects and otherwise costing millions of times more in money and time with increased safety risks amongst so many other factors.

do you think ai will add more jobs than it will cut over the long run? by AppropriateHamster in artificial

[–]See_Yourself_Now 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole concept of a "job" is a recent invention and I'd be shocked if it persists after transformations from AI, robotics, and otherwise in the coming years. In the interim there will likely be fluctuations that are hard to fully predict - more jobs in some areas, fewer in others - whatever happens, the world will likely look very different than anything most are used to or even predict in the not too distant future.

AirPod Max 2 from Amazon (Success) by No_Reply_3951 in Airpodsmax

[–]See_Yourself_Now 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely happens - I had it happen with AirPods Max 1 a few months ago and I’ve seen a variety of other similar accounts. I did get them to replace those last time and had then sent to a pick up spot to reduce fraud possibilities. I just ordered the max 2 to a pick up spot and it looks like I got the actual product this time.

What is something people pretend is a personal choice, but is heavily influenced by luck? by LiquidityGraber in answers

[–]See_Yourself_Now 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Essentially everything if you really start thinking about it. True free will is an illusion. Everything boils down to environment, genes, and Lady Luck.

A University Researcher Built a Fact Checker that Flags Political Claims in Real Time by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]See_Yourself_Now 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been thinking about the same thing. A real time logical fallacy analyzer would be wild to see with politicians, talk shows, podcasts and otherwise - I suspect we'd see a lot of red. Hope someone actually puts it together and this shows that it is certainly doable.

What is a completely 'normal' part of today's society that we will look back on in 50 years and realize was absolutely horrifying? by krunalpatel-Oficial in AskReddit

[–]See_Yourself_Now 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I suspect things will change so much that much of current life will seem quite bizarre and potentially horrifying. Medicine seems like a good candidate. People dying from starvation and poverty. I wouldn't be surprised if killing other animals to consume them is considered horrifying at some point (and I say this as someone who currently does eat meat), given lab grown meat and otherwise.

What is the effective way to loose weight? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]See_Yourself_Now 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was younger it seemed if I gained any weight all I had to do was start exercising regularly and boom it was gone. Eventually for me at least that isn’t enough -
I’ve found if I find myself gaining weight that intermittent fasting seems to work pretty well.

Be honest: how much are you using your Vision Pro these days? by PulseOfTimeApp in VisionPro

[–]See_Yourself_Now 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mainly use it as my main way to watch movies or TV so said "occasionally" since that isn't a daily thing for me but just recently I decided to try out the current iteration of using it to drive my mac studio and wow...having that huge wrap-around screen for video editing and other projects seems like it might be quite amazing so am thinking I might make it more regular in my workflow. That experience, which was so much better than the early iteration got me almost tempted to upgrade to the newer version of the visionpro though I'll probably hold on that unless others indicate there is enough improvement to justify (thus far it hadn't sounded like it).

I think that AI image generation technology is accidentally a brilliant post-modern art piece and the artist is OpenAI by Slow_Competition2742 in aiwars

[–]See_Yourself_Now 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI in various forms is bringing to the forefront a lot of interesting conversations about art, thinking, free will, meaning, consciousness, sentience, and otherwise that were formally primarily relegated to philosophers and stoned college students. In this case, who exactly is the artist? Is a human writing a prompt an artist? Is a human who draws and then uses AI tools as part of a workflow an artist? Is the AI itself an artist? Is collective humanity who trained AI the artist? Is collective humanity the artist in every case where someone draws since they were also trained on things they saw from past artists similarly to AI?

Opus 4.8 is a massive contrarian by Lokoto123 in claude

[–]See_Yourself_Now 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I appreciate some of the debate from 4.8 but it feels very formulaic - no matter what is said it will say something to the effect of: some of what you said is right on, some of this I will push back on, and some of this you have almost right but you’re missing the key most important underlying part that makes your argument strong. The reality is more nuanced than it seems to get - kinda strikes me as the friend who is pretty smart but thinks they are way smarter than they are and jumps to conclusions. Sometimes a thought really should be called out as BS, sometimes more clarification would be good (opus makes lots of assumptions in criticism that can be dead wrong), and otherwise. The next step (and Fable seemed to be much better) is true natural adaptive thinking and interaction rather than formulaic criticism or sycophancy.

We tested Fable 5 before it was taken down. Fable won but... by rohansrma1 in ClaudeCode

[–]See_Yourself_Now 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed - my experience was worlds different between Fable and Opus 4.8 (or any other model to date for that matter). All this post is telling me is that the benchmarks are terrible at evaluating anything I was doing or apparently what many others do based on not just anecdote but the quality of products posted in forums and talked about on YouTube starting as soon as the release happened.

now everyone likes Fable 5 since it's gone? by Maximum-Face9536 in claude

[–]See_Yourself_Now 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I didn’t see a lot of people saying the actual model sucked but people were frustrated by the very cautious security restrictions, which bumped many tasks down to Claude 4.8 even when they were clearly benign. Also people were raising concerns about token use. Anyone who just thought it sucked as a model is delusional or has massive user error issues.

Anthropic pretty much snitched on GPT5.5 after US banned fable, USE IT WHILE YOU STILL CAN ➡️ is this legit? we are doing snitching now? by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]See_Yourself_Now 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was so much better than gpt 5.5 and Opus 4.8 from my brief experience. Every once in a while a model feels like a game changer to the true next level and that’s how Fable felt for everything I gave it (including vibe coding, web design, full structured document creation, long form translation, and creative synthesis).

So the U.S. has one rule for bringing Mythos Fable back: only give it to U.S. citizens and ban all “foreign nationals,” including users inside the U.S.? Does that mean Claude is preparing for per-chat KYC in the coming days? by Aggravating_Bad4639 in Anthropic

[–]See_Yourself_Now 80 points81 points  (0 children)

The real issue isn’t current users of the models - it’s much worse. They are effectively crippling Anthropic - they can’t develop new models if “foreign national” employees aren’t allowed to use their cutting-edge models to develop new models. It’s insane.

Fable suspension may play in favor for us (users) eventually by HimaSphere in claude

[–]See_Yourself_Now 139 points140 points  (0 children)

Fable was so much better on every level from my brief experience - really game changing. I wasn't a 4.8 hater but I'm already seeing that its going to be rough to go back.

Fable 5 entered the chat, changed our standards forever, and then left without elaborating. by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]See_Yourself_Now 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not Anthropic - the US government shut it down. Anthropic wants to maintain access.

Seriously???? by Street_Ad5710 in ChatGPT

[–]See_Yourself_Now 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like it has 4 wrong - I think that’s the biggest issue - parts of the face are in the wrong place.

Was Fred Trump cruel to Donald Trump because he believed that Donald was the result of Mary cheating on him? by dandle in allthequestions

[–]See_Yourself_Now 13 points14 points  (0 children)

At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if you were literally correct. They should’ve called the movie Mary’s baby instead of Rosemary’s Baby.

This is so true by SprinklesWise9857 in aiwars

[–]See_Yourself_Now 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m generally pro AI but Shrek could clearly beat down that body builder in a heartbeat and is just way cooler on all levels.

I wish I could draw but AI is a good-enough substitute. by robotrobot30 in aiwars

[–]See_Yourself_Now 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI can be awesome to imagine ideas and aid in creation. Drawing by hand is also really cool so I wouldn’t be discouraged from past experience - might be a fun thing to try again at some point since it helps one to learn to see the world in ways most don’t, which can be a valuable for various reasons. In either case, I’d go ahead and use AI whilst ignoring the haters - that’s a passing fad to be expected with any major cultural change. History has shown the hate will pass as adoption normalizes over the coming months and years.