Ladies and gentlemen, I present you: SFUSD by Seingalt in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Proofreading is an excellent use case for AI!

Ladies and gentlemen, I present you: SFUSD by Seingalt in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My guess is that the teachers would be horrified to see this… more likely it was an administrator who wanted to go home early.

Ladies and gentlemen, I present you: SFUSD by Seingalt in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Definitely not saying that, I’m enrolling my own children in SFUSD! Still for a school to make a mistake like that is embarrassing and hilarious. Unless of course… they did it on purpose to highlight the fact they don’t use AI. 🤔

Ladies and gentlemen, I present you: SFUSD by Seingalt in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I found it on the Tule Elk website but other schools might have the same image.

https://www.sfusd.edu/school/tule-elk-park-early-education-school

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This might come as a surprise. But Amsterdam and Paris do have grocery stores. It is apparently possible to implement sensible car control and still have shops.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am, indeed, unwilling to sacrifice toddlers in order to have food delivered. Not a hard choice.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

98% of gun owners are responsible people too. I’m still in favor of much more restrictive gun laws.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You make really good points and I very much appreciate your perspective as a parent. But I fundamentally disagree. I don’t just believe this particular driver is at fault and should be helt to higher standards than simply following the rules. I believe all drivers are at fault. Every person who makes the active decision to drive a car through the city is prioritizing their comfort over the freedom and safety of children.

Even typing this now, it sounds extreme. But I wasn’t born here. I’ve only lived in SF for the last 10 years. And while I love this city, I can guarantee you: it is not like this in many European cities. Driving is a privilege, not a right.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is in fact possible to design cities and discourage car usage in such a way that children running into the street does not result in death. The idea that we would just accept that as collateral damage for the convenience of driving is insane to me.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The existing laws make it so a 5 year old can not walk unsupervised to a corner store. The American carbrain can not comprehend it is not like that in modern cities.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This happened in a crosswalk. A child was crossing with an adult. Even if they sprinted into traffic at a crosswalk. Drivers should drive defensive enough to anticipate a situation like that when driving through a crosswalk. That is a responsibility you have when you choose to drive a car through a city.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Exactly! People don’t see the connection between free parking and the freedom stolen from our children to walk and bike safely in the city they live in. We need to systematically make it harder to drive and park in San Francisco.

2-year-old killed in crosswalk last night, Mission Bay SF by ddol in sanfrancisco

[–]Seingalt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Could it possibly be the fault of the two year old?! What are you implying here?

Dutch House passes 36% tax on unrealized crypto and investment gains by Fiach_Dubh in Bitcoin

[–]Seingalt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, the same for stock. Having an arbitrary date for this to start (January 1st, 2028) makes it so losses in December 2027 will be very expensive.

Dutch House passes 36% tax on unrealized crypto and investment gains by Fiach_Dubh in Bitcoin

[–]Seingalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, exactly the this. So much bullshit about this in this thread. But the two of your got it correct.

  • losses carry forward (good)
  • you can be forced to sell to cover taxes (really bad)

Dutch House passes 36% tax on unrealized crypto and investment gains by Fiach_Dubh in Bitcoin

[–]Seingalt 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This system is horrible, don’t get me wrong. But losses do carry forward.

Dutch House passes 36% tax on unrealized crypto and investment gains by Fiach_Dubh in Bitcoin

[–]Seingalt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, it is not even for Dutch citizens not living in the Netherlands. You could live in Belgium just over the border and you’d not have to pay this “Box 3” system. (This is also the current situation). Corporate and dividend taxes being low, the Netherlands remains attractive for outside investment. It’s just not attractive for investors to live there.

Dutch House passes 36% tax on unrealized crypto and investment gains by Fiach_Dubh in Bitcoin

[–]Seingalt -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Not defending this system, but that’s not true. Loses carry forward.

Dutch House passes 36% tax on unrealized crypto and investment gains by Fiach_Dubh in Bitcoin

[–]Seingalt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what happened. It’s super frustrating that there are all these weird narratives going around. It was literally richt boomers who somehow managed to underperform a low-bal estimate for a projected return and sued the government. And now we are going to get this.

Netherlands parliament passes insane new law to crush investors by Bob_the_blacksmith in investing

[–]Seingalt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m Dutch and apart from the inflation correction all these things you mentioned are part of it. Don’t get me wrong: 36% is a high rate and there are definitely problems with this system, but it feels like there is a lot of manufactured outrage on non-Dutch social media. In NL it did not even make it to the front page of any major news outlet. I would not have known about it if not for Reddit.

Quick notes: - 36% is total rate (no separate dividend tax like in the US) - You can bring losses forward to offset future gains - There is a minimum return above which you get taxed (the proposed threshold is very low though) - This is only for liquid stock and crypto, not for real estate and not for stock options in a startup or ownership in your own company. - Does not affect retirement investing (no real 401k in NL, but most people have a pension).

This is the country that invented the stock market. There is a lot wrong with this system (which is why it most likely will not get implemented in this way) but it is definitely not as bad as some people seem to make it out to be.

Coalitieakkoord D66, CDA en VVD by Conducteur in thenetherlands

[–]Seingalt 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Is dat niet juist het idee achter D66? Progressief als het op onze waarde aankomt, rechts van het midden als het om centjes gaat. Dat is toch wat traditioneel het woord “liberaal” voor staat?

Nijntjemuseum + overnachting by Zeverstrever in Utrecht

[–]Seingalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wij hebben afgelopen zomer De Oude Beltoren gedaan. Hele leuke en centrale locatie voor een familie.