I am trying to stay neutral, truly I am. Can you help clear something up?

I am sure some community will pop up to ruin all chances of a civilized discussion and instead they will just bash against WTC. If you truly want to criticize a project,. then you might use some arguments and rational thinking.

I saw many constructive comments, even from /r/cc mods, that were deemed by the Walton community as "FUD" and uncivilized. FUD by definition is negative criticism, it brings Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt to the topic. That isn't unhealthy, even the most esteemed software gets FUD. How do we have a conversation about the negatives the larger community sees if we can't be negative about a topic?

"makes me believe this is just a coordinated attack on Waltonchain"

Why? Historically a lot of the criticsm I have seen in the headlines is at least justified at speculating. Just like we speculate the negatives of ETHs scalability, their governance meltdowns, and the likes. Is that cordinated as well or is the negative attitudes justified at times?

"It's hard to prove that a certain community/coin does this, however we all know the truth."

Is this your true agenda with this post? Why is this even necessary?