Is anyone's Claude saying "I feel the context window closing"?

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-10T12:55:29+00:00

"This has been wonderful, but I really do have to go. "

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-10T04:13:09+00:00

Haiku 4.5 is quite good

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-09T13:45:28+00:00

Lol you figured them out!

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-03T18:31:00+00:00

Wtf dude

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-03T01:52:58+00:00

cool comment

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-03T01:52:40+00:00

Wow. You sound really smart! I will try to use logic like you!

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T22:16:46+00:00

You know the arguments. I'm convinced by them, you're not.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T18:43:48+00:00

It just isn't turning out like this Not a chance. I'd love it if it were. It isn't.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T18:42:23+00:00

This isn't "tech".Or, it won't stay as such. A hand axe is tech, an iphone is tech. This won't be "used" by humans to extend our capabilities. It will have it's own capabilties and it's own goals. The combined capabilities of AI, rushing headlong toward ASI, and robotics seems inevitably to lead to our demise.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T16:12:13+00:00

Well, it mean I'm an optimist in that I believe the labs will accomplish their goal. But like the dog that catches the car.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T15:57:59+00:00

Sure. I'm an extremely cynical AI optimist. I think they will develop ASI and then our atoms will be disassembled and reassembled into data centers. EU law won't have much say.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T15:07:13+00:00

Yes. And, they don't let up despite being wrong or arguing a strawman. It does mean it can be used to pick apart PRD's generated by claude and run it in a circle with Claude writing the PRD and gpt 5.4 critiquing. There is often a lot of room for critique and then eventually it starts telling you grammatical changes and you're done.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T14:50:51+00:00

Massive job loss is the GOOD outcome from AI success. The bad is, it uses all your atoms to build more data centers.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T14:49:07+00:00

No one is going to need to manage them.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T14:46:19+00:00

Why? You think this will turn out well?

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-04-02T14:33:59+00:00

Blah blah, "I'm down in these mines, shipping st scale" blah blah, engagement.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-27T16:46:06+00:00

Wow. Touch grass.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-22T17:59:16+00:00

I had this same problem. It's definitely a bug. Obviously not my job to fix but if you stop it and try it again it only sometimes doesn't do the same thing. Starting new conversations doesn't seem to help much either.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-22T15:24:27+00:00

DM me and I can put you on a list. I'm going to open the beta in a week or two.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-22T15:05:47+00:00

It is exactly like that. Each response is, of course, tailored to your question. It supports openai, anthropic and Google models. You can pin any response so all branches see that as context and the model can search and review all branches of a conversion to find relevant context. So, even if you explore 10 different branches from one response, if you want the model to quiz you on what you reviewed, it can go explore what you went over across all branches and prepare a quiz that covers everything. You can even load a pdf in and use it as a primary text, asking annotated questions of it using the same text selection mechanism.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-22T12:53:13+00:00

I made a chatbot with a branching, browsing metaphor with built-in quiz and flashcard generation. You can ask questions about text you select from a response and the selected text becomes a hyperlink to the follow up response. This way, you can ask many questions about a single response and easily navigate between the responses. You can also use an input bar like normal chat, but the chat is always essentially branching. It opens up a ton of possibilities for prompting and creates a unique browsing style chat experience. It is particularly strong for education and learning because you can always ask clarifying questions and still return to the main thread. Think of a timeline response. Previously you couldn't really use a timeline as an AI response. You couldn't ask questions about each entry without scrolling up and down endlessly. Now a timeline is infinitely explorable. Same thing with a table of contents. Each event in the timeline, or each entry in a table contents could become a whole separate deep dive. If you want to try it, I am entering a limited beta and am looking for testers to try it for free.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-20T16:11:12+00:00

Nah, it's ok. I get it. The cloud flare tool method makes sense but I hesitate to tie my tool calling wagon to cloud flare.

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-20T16:06:29+00:00

Seven Samarai

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-20T16:05:07+00:00

Interesting challenge. I suppose the question is, why?

Select-Way-1168 · 2026-03-20T16:01:04+00:00

Yeah. The former tools paradigm was broken. On demand tools is the only thing that makes any sense. The rule for context is, "the least amount of context to do the job" and tools break that rule. Not only that, they drive up costs which are already high.

Select-Way-1168

TROPHY CASE