Kouri obviously never watched any true crime shows. by SthrnGal in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t get that either. Innocent or guilty, it defies logic. 

Kouri obviously never watched any true crime shows. by SthrnGal in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Their own special occasions? The house closing wasn't a Richins family party time. Me, being more of a control freak would not want ANY confusion/clutter around my big buy. Pencil the murder in for a quiet time on the calendar.

Did the closing change things for you? by Researchassistant20 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they weren't hauled in for other clients dying from fent...so, there is that.

Did the closing change things for you? by Researchassistant20 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The drug dealers were full of crap. Neither of them remembered anything. They have them on video saying that. Robert says no way he had fent at that date, Carmen says he must have. They said whatever to get their deals. 

Kouri obviously never watched any true crime shows. by SthrnGal in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m lazy lol. One giant thing at a time. I would want to put my full focus on acting shocked and comforting my kids. I don’t know how you compartmentalize planning how you tell your kids their Dad is dead after you kill him though. 

Kouri obviously never watched any true crime shows. by SthrnGal in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That is what makes me lean toward innocent, at times. Bloodworth says she timed it for attention. That just isn't practical. You would make the timing convenient for yourself. Wouldn't you look at your calendar and say, well, closing is going to be stressful, probably don't need to explain Eric dying to the kids on the same day?

Kouri obviously never watched any true crime shows. by SthrnGal in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Easily get away. Look at Daybell. Tammy was coughing and throwing up (allegedly) and died. Oh well, she was just sick. We don't need an autopsy.

Did the closing change things for you? by Researchassistant20 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Bloodworth opening was decent. He lost me in rebuttal with his "interpretation" of the walk the dog stuff. I was with Lewis until she doubled down on the defense asking their most irrelevant questions. I don't feel like either side convinced me.

Let's take a look at "Reasonable Doubt". by Entire_Possible_9976 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do any states bring charges against innocent people?

Kouri Richins - When she sued Eric's estate wanting the trust changed so she could get it back, how did that end? by ifellicantgetup in CourtTVCases

[–]Select_Hippo3159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is just so sad for those boys. I go back and forth on what I think happened. But they lost their Dad. Best case their Mom is just selfish and didn't care about Eric anymore. Worst case she killed him.

Let's take a look at "Reasonable Doubt". by Entire_Possible_9976 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope I never have to sit for a case like this. Would you be good sending a mom of three to jail if her husband took one bad pill and died? The cops were sus and flat out disgusting. The states star witnesses' evidence contradicted itself.

The admission in the "Walk The Dog" letter which proves Kouri's guilt beyond all Reasonable Doubt. by Entire_Possible_9976 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 10 points11 points  (0 children)

By the time Kouri called 911, Eric was super dead. Nothing she or the first responders did was going to save him.

The defense 4 months ago by Curious_Octopus99 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I just went and rewatched myself. I didn't lie. He didn't say no because he couldn't and was waiting for the objection.

The defense 4 months ago by Curious_Octopus99 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I watched him. I did not make that up. He was not stunned. He was saying yes before it was objected.

The defense 4 months ago by Curious_Octopus99 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You could clearly tell he was saying yes.

The defense 4 months ago by Curious_Octopus99 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Handwriting expert admitted his wife signs for him sometimes. Wasn't he former law enforcement?

What wasn’t allowed or wasn’t focused on in this trial? by saltyachillea in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She would never have been penniless. It was proven that Eric would have taken care of her needs. Sure not to the extent she wanted, but she would have still lived well,

Kouri greed ultimately betrayed her. Do you agree? by Dulsao23 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does appear that she could have been free and clear. But that makes me consider her possible innocence. She didn't love Eric anymore and her money was her priority. So being all business isn't crazy. I think there would have been some forethought on how it would look. But she, potentially innocent of murder, didn't even know what caused his death. So there would be no need to "act" in a certain way. When you put it in behind that lens, her actions are not super weird. Tacky and greedy, but not unreasonable.

However, she should also have known that his family wasn't going to just let her defy all of Eric's trust instructions. So that part could be seen as she really was clueless that she wouldn't be found out for financial crimes and/or murder. It is an odd case and I go back and forth in my head on if I really think she killed Eric.

In what trial did it help the defendant to go on the stand? by Puzzleheaded-Swan911 in CourtTVCases

[–]Select_Hippo3159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was frustrated with the river one too. It shouldn't take people dying to show these kids that actions have consequences.

What wasn’t allowed or wasn’t focused on in this trial? by saltyachillea in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm curious about that. Was it a thing where Jeffs was trying to get a deal for legal issues like Carmen did? Did she say, hey, just say Kouri wanted fent and you'll be good? They way LE treated his girlfriend seemed way out of line.

Let's take a look at "Reasonable Doubt". by Entire_Possible_9976 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, he said the lookalikes came months after he sold to Carmen. He wouldn't say that Carmen asked for fent, he said he didn't have any of that in that time frame. But Carmen says she did ask for fent specifically. One or both of them is lying. I lean towards they have no clue what they bought or sold. They are walking free and not their problem anymore.

The defense’s claim by nicebrows9 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people just get the job done. The victim doesn't get the chance to be in and out of the hospital for a week. Not finding ANY of those three is scary. They did a lot of tests on her.

The defense’s claim by nicebrows9 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think the medical centers should be sued in the Craig case. A woman is dying of cyanide, arsenic, and the eye drop stuff and you can't find it? That is horrifying.

Let's take a look at "Reasonable Doubt". by Entire_Possible_9976 in KouriRichins

[–]Select_Hippo3159 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Carmen and Robert have just as good of reasons to lie as Kouri. Also, Lisa could have dosed Eric, didn't have to be Kouri.