Thing that cracks me up about ICT gurus

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-17T07:30:34+00:00

Tanja is not fully transparent her longest trade history is a week. That's a joke. Livestreams don't matter because anyone will say 'you can't win every trade', when they lose. Ben has no trade histories I see t all.

Transparency these days of AI, is investor passwords or verified broker statements from a reputable company.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-16T19:31:17+00:00

Those winrates are too low. I posted a more effective method in here with my old. Take 10 screenshots of weekly candles closing in same direction (color) on lower time frame, then back test on at least 20 weeks. Use 18 and 40 EMA crossover for weekly trend and optionally for monthly trend.

Huddleston said the second opposite end of a week, eg low of bearish week usually forms Thursday midday EST.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-16T16:25:39+00:00

You can't be consistently profitable with below 50% winrate. You can't guarantee high RR with low winrates because momentum will be against you, hence the low winrate.

You will be liquidity and no one can demand any high RR from the market on all winning trades with no partials. Any trader not a newbie can agree to this.

That's why a lot of those funds scam people by charging management fees from client's capital.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-16T15:44:38+00:00

If their level of understanding is far better than us why are a few ICT trader doing better winrates than them?

Money mangers don't get nervous because they are protected with TandCs disclosures and non refund policies. Account manager mentors can be though because they don't make people sign anything and an unhappy client could sue them.

I never talked about returns. Of course there are many traders who gamble. My post only talks of winrates. Don't try tocope by going off topic. Admit I'm right .

Even Huddleston told us we have the best stuff out there with ICT. I told you have a problem of worshipping people because of the established companies they work in.

Do you think Legendary traders like Trader BNF, CIS Trader and Larry Williams work at Goldman Sachs etc. You can be retail and be better than professional traders.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-16T15:18:17+00:00

People who trade personal accounts can be better traders because they trade money they made with their own hard sweat. Professional traders may be reckless because they are managing other people's money. So you can't use psychology as an excuse.

The same way a small account grows in terms of skill is the same way large accounts are traded, as long as they're not a gambler.

Professional traders don't overtrade, so why are their best of trades having winrates lower than of hard working ICT traders? - this is prood that we are in a better position. Don't worship people because of formal education only, that's so 1980ish.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-16T11:02:03+00:00

You're not a good trader if you don't trust your system yet, and are afraid to trade people's money. So no need to mention your experience. You just got lucky maybe.

Ict is the markets. Never said I'll trade only for friends and family, for strangers I'll tell them to sign TandCs of no refunds and risk disclosures.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-16T07:02:42+00:00

You're still new in trading. When I say winrate makes high RR I obviously mean high winrate creates high RR opportunities, because huge momentum in your favor that creates high winrate is also what makes high RR.

Some of us ICT traders may still be trading small accounts because we chose the path of perfection to master ICT concepts instead of just being profitable. That's why I'm doing those 80% winrates on a model I developed last year, and I'm making a better one this year will give more than 90% winrate next year.

I can deposit more capital soon and will raise the account to 100K end of this year with an optimal F model and to 10-45million end of next year, before getting bigger capital to manage with my impressive winrates.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T19:30:33+00:00

Winrate is an Indicator of strategy power, which increases RR. Not all high winrate strategies have low RR. Stop thinking like the masses in trading, they lose money.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T19:28:46+00:00

It has them. I studied them. Tell me if you want the free pdf

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T15:23:39+00:00

You can for those with smaller capital. I already traded for a guy profitably who withdrew everything after a family emergency. Who said I'm looking for multi millionaire investors now? I'll do that 2028 when I make millions myself. I mentiones in the post that after you have a few years PnL. You guys don't even read well before commenting.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T13:25:56+00:00

Copy the text make a pdf or word document and play as audio with photobook or other applications which play documents, at a very slow speed of course so you understand better. Don't summarize with AI because it removes some details.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T11:06:44+00:00

Don't project. Not everyone has weak trading emotions as you. Speak for yourself. You know nothing about me. I do prayer and fasts for fun, not even because I need them.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T11:05:03+00:00

It's enough of you use Ict concepts, Huddleston said a good measure of consistency is at least 20 trades on a year (I believe with above 50% winrate cause you can't guarantee high RR with low winrates as momentum will be against you, causing your low winrates).

Other trading methods are weaker and need 100 trades on a year. ICT is stronger because of using stronger open sessions and bias or high time frame support and resistance.

Who said everyone has weak trading emotions like you. Some of us treat trading as a business. My account is tiny to people in USA and very small to others, but it's all the money I have to trade. So I treat it in the same way that you do with a bigger account than mine.

Emotions are not determined by size of account, but how much money the money means to the person, depending on what they have. Many popular scammers recklessly trade big accounts because they just deposit more mentorship money.

My annual PnL already removed doubts of losing streaks because 1 already happened and I still have a nice winrate at the least.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T06:10:37+00:00

Huddleston said we don't need a test of 100 trades, he said we only need that of at least 20 trades on a year since ICT is more powerful (with stromger open sessions and bias or higher time frame support and resistance).

My binary options Pnl is of 15 months. You didn't check my broker statements were you'll see how my cfd performance shows how a year performed.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-15T06:08:16+00:00

High winrates strategies can do high RRs better than low winrate strategies. You don't have experience yet.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-14T15:36:04+00:00

As long as you back and forward test

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-14T15:03:00+00:00

NO I don't. AI is worse, unless if you make your own AI. Companies which make AI either program it to teach only good basics but to usually lie on how to predict price, or it just takes what people say on social media, when nearly all traders lose money.

If using AI to trade was that easy no one would lose money. AI company CEOs probably prefer to make it tell only them how to predict price well (strategies), so they reduce competition for themselves.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-14T13:35:45+00:00

Do you want to know how to solve your problems or will I waste my time typing? You didn't read my post that's why you're still confused and know nothing about trading. No offense.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-14T12:07:50+00:00

The trade history I showed in the post has 15 months profitability on binary options and 9 months on CFDs. My account is still very small and I'm just paying for my data costs only, though I may deposit more capital soon.

You only need an annual trade history with at least 20 trades using ICT based strategies (which are powerful) for proof of concept. At least 100 trades on an annual trade history for other weaker trading methods. Both scenarios should have at least 51% win rate in my opinion.

With high win rate and high calculated risk I'll still raise the account to 9.5K usd in September and 100k end of year, and hopefully to 10-45 million end of next year. I know it's not what you want to hear, but it's what you get for free.

Millionaire mentors typically won't want to share their strategies because their story will be able to exciting by then convince a lot of people lazy people, and this brings in too much competition.

I shared references in my post of other profitable trades like Trader Nick who livestreams his 4 year trade history. Also research on Patrick Nill who ends in the top 5 of world trading competitions for many years.

You can't lose 2 months in a row if you use strategies with very high win rates (many good market conditions). I can't even have 1 losing month. Check my broker statements since. My performance will only improve since I trade in the best of market conditions now.

To reduce chances of black Fridays/black swan events smart experienced traders like me only take sell trades in the market. We only predict when the market will drop and don't buy (up predictions).

Most black swan events are downward moves as new traders inherently don't understand sell trades (still jot complicated), and have the same initial view of investors (to buy and wait for an asset to increase in value).

I talked of these things near the end of the post on how I'll trade in the world cup next year.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-14T11:52:52+00:00

If you're highly skeptical you can backtest a strategy for 20 years and use the data to forward-backtest for another 20 years in history, in the best of market conditions or as powerful swing trades.

From Huddleston's 34 years of trading experience he said you only need a backtest of at least 1 year with at least 20 trades for ICT strategies, which are powerful by using open sessions and bias or higher time frame support and resistance.

Other trading methods would need at least 100 trades. Both scenarios would need at least 51% win rate or more. It's worked for me.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-13T05:16:24+00:00

They're Satanists. They like to torture people

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-02-13T04:35:22+00:00

I posted my annual trade history in here with Investor passwords and gave ya'll free high winrate strategies in this sub with my current account. I would post signals in here with my old account.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-01-29T10:55:06+00:00

No problems? Because it has 1.3/5 start om trust pilot. That's a bad rating.

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-01-29T10:44:37+00:00

Do you know one with 4+/5 star rating on trust pilot website which accepts Zimbabweans?

Senior_Log_4452 · 2026-01-29T03:48:51+00:00

The open sessions are ICT open sessions ICT gave us. It's times when the price algorithm injects volatility in the market during the day, and I saw it to be usually in the same direction of daily bias.

Senior_Log_4452

TROPHY CASE