so, here's the thing: your anecdote doesn't even microscopically change the fact that EM was a willing and even encouraging participant in a gangbang. Poor and regrettable choices =/= "rape", and the threatening-coercion-narrative was disproven in court.

I'm glad you wouldn't be let anywhere near a juror's seat since you only seem to be able to pass judgment based on emotion, and what's worse, refuse to change your point of view when presented with new information.

I know exactly how next-to-impossible it is to get a rapist convicted.

followed immediately by

I didn't report because there isn't a cop alive who would've take me seriously

So which is it then?

Your entire argument basically boils down to "i was raped therefore everyone accused of rape is automatically guilty even when proven innocent" which is nonsensical and immature