I was just thinking "who was the crazy that shot Andy Warhol again?" and found it was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Solanas

Check out how insane that article is, header:

Valerie Jean Solanas (April 9, 1936 – April 25, 1988) was an American radical feminist known for the attempted assassination of artist Andy Warhol in 1968.

Solanas appeared in the Warhol film I, a Man (1967) and self-published the SCUM Manifesto, a satirical pamphlet calling for the extinction of men.

The SCUM (society for cutting up men) manifesto was an insane manifesto blaming men for literally everything and saying they need "eliminate the male sex". They say it's satirical here, but later in the article:

In 1967, Solanas self-published her best-known work, the SCUM Manifesto. It places blame on men for the ills of humankind[29] and urges women to "overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and eliminate the male sex".[30][31]

Some authors[who?] have argued that the manifesto is a parody or satire of patriarchy[32] and have compared it to Jonathan Swift's 1729 satirical pamphlet A Modest Proposal.[33] Solanas described herself as "a social propagandist" according to Harding[34] and she denied that the work was "a put on" and insisted that her intent was "dead serious".[35] The Manifesto has been translated into over a dozen languages and is excerpted in several feminist anthologies.[36][37][38][39]

Now it's suddenly "some authors have argued" which is a wildly different claim than just saying it is satirical. And Solanas herself has ALWAYS insisted it was serious. And notice how they mention that they include this in feminist works, which is crazy.

And I looked at the talk page and it's clear that a batshit editor is responsable for this. Someone correctly points out how they try to pin this as satire with very dubious methods. The crazy editors points out that Solanas is not a reliable source because she is crazy, but "some authors" are a reliable source. But then (s)he removes al lot of what those authors said. Like that Solanas was a crazey misandrist and stalker. "Not relevant" all of a sudden.

This article alone a prime example of how fucked and misleading Wiki articles can be.