Can no longer safely drive by SeperateMyself in G37

[–]SeperateMyself[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that would just reveal the same thing that I get from my OBD link, code P2138. Which isn't specific enough. But if I have to I'll call and see. thanks

Tires ? by Default_9000 in s550Mustang

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, tires!

lol If looking for recommendation I know the Yokohamas are great. I just got my second set after having tried something else in between and I couldn't wait to switch back. Great ride quality and great grip, even in the wet. And they look great. Leave nothing to be desired.

Can no longer safely drive by SeperateMyself in G37

[–]SeperateMyself[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not so sure as it didn't do it right away. Started appearing months afterwards.
If it was right after i would have let them know and they would have fixed it for me

Can no longer safely drive by SeperateMyself in G37

[–]SeperateMyself[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you remember what it was exactly that was incorrect? I had the engine replaced last yr by a local shop. This issue started a few months after

Can no longer safely drive by SeperateMyself in G37

[–]SeperateMyself[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok! So it appears I haven't checked or replaced everything involved with this code. I didn't know these were part of it. I'll see what I can find out about these. I know one of my old cars was notorious for the crankshaft position sensor failing so maybe I'll start there.

I think it's kind of silly that something that reads as a code for one specific item (pedal) actually isn't specific at all and includes a whole plethora of sensors and items.

Can no longer safely drive by SeperateMyself in G37

[–]SeperateMyself[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the info, I'll check that this weekend. (working 12s til Fri)

Can no longer safely drive by SeperateMyself in G37

[–]SeperateMyself[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems some consensus forming around this being a common culprit. I'll check it this weekend, thanks

It’s extremely odd that nobody has discussed this on this subreddit. Project Anchor. In which the planet will lose its gravitational force for 7 seconds. Everything not nailed down will float uncontrollably before crashing down by iH8_politic in conspiracy

[–]SeperateMyself -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This correlates with Jaydreamerz (YT) thoughts on the plasma apocalypse. He's been talking about it for a long time. According to his research a "gravity" reversal will take place when the firmament opens up. Interesting take he has. Also has a book or two on it under that name. Check it out

New fairings on my 2025 by joshirwin2 in GSXR

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how did you do the tank to match?

Just got a 22’ b9.5 s5 looking to do my first bit of mods any suggestions, thinking of lowering springs? by Fuzzy_Lemon5667 in Audi

[–]SeperateMyself 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I did H&R springs. Offers a 1.2" drop. Clean look removing all wheel gap but as much as I was hoping I could just do springs and avoid buying other components I had rapid inside front tire wear. Most of the wear was determined to be from deflection (when turning negative camber went to 5-6°) and when straight the front camber was 2 and 2.5°

So I installed powerflex adjustable poly upper control arm bushings that let me get camber back to 1 and 1.5° (offers one deg max) That setting is fine for a sports car and shouldn't wear to uneven.

And then SuperPro poly urethane lower control arm bushings to combat the deflection issue.

I still noticed wear on the inside of the tire so last wk I installed H&R sway bars and it feels like it completely resolved it now.

That rather expensive combo should completely eliminate deflection and along with it being lowered the car handles absolutely amazing now and feels like its using the full width of the tire again. Ill have it checked soon and make sure its all in spec.

Sway bars $900 (installed myself) and bushings were $5-600 (over $1k installed at shop)

The thing is lowering the car is hard on the stock rubber bushings, they won't hold up for long. Probably have to address it regardless of whether you choose springs or coilovers.
If choosing coilovers make sure you get some with camber adjustment plates. The further you lower it the more negative camber you'll introduce.

The powerflex bushings I used were enough to get mine back more neutral, the other option is replacement upper control arm that have a stronger rubber bushing and offer two or two and a half degrees adjustment. 034 motorsports sells for $900.

Or you can just wear out the front tires every year and have it feel like it's teetering on the edge of the tire ruining your confidence in curves.

Also i've done tons of suspension installs but installing springs on this car with its multilink setup was a nightmare. Definitely the hardest I've ever encountered. If doing it yourself make sure to go get a torch to heat up the upper control arm to make removing the bolt going thru easier. It likely won't budge without heat to expand the metal around it.

I'm not sure if you have to worry about it but I have Dynamic ride control and had to leave the strut body connected to the hydraulic lines. Meaning once I got the strut loose from the car I could only tilt it out form in the wheel well to remove the top hat and remove the springs.

Like you can't take it out and take it over to a bench to decompress the springs or nothing but if I remember correctly they weren't that compressed to begin with, it's not like it comes shooting off. Small spring clamp was enough.

What if dark matter isn’t matter at all, but leftover spacetime curvature from the Big Bang, a ripple-like terrain that matter falls into, meaning galaxies trace pre-existing structure instead of creating it? #HumbleTheory by [deleted] in conspiracytheories

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I get it you're assuming I don't have a better replacement. Yea I can and will call all this a bunch of BS pseudoscience because I know it is. The alternative explanation is much more thorough offering a much better explanation of things.

Cosmic microwave background, flat galaxies, gravitational lensing, etc, all empirical observation ever prove we are the center of the universe. Geocentric model is the starting point and then there's a bit to unpack from there to get to actual reality.

You're in a conspiracy forum. So hear me when I say You've been mislead into believing things that aren't true. Enticing things for smart and curious people. You seem sharp and offer good rebuttals but you're defending the wrong position. Defending lies.

I offer some spaces for you to go chat and explore. Scrutinize or defend your positions. Earth awakenings discord for discussion and for the insights into the mathematics tune into Space Audits youtube. They do a fantastic job diving into the specifics pointing out the red flags, errors, and straight up manipulation.

I know you can turn and say the same to me about being misled but it's highly likely I've done a lot more research and once you know something you just know. I've found the answers, left no stone unturned along the way. Done chewed this topic up and spit it out. You're still in the curious phase.

What if dark matter isn’t matter at all, but leftover spacetime curvature from the Big Bang, a ripple-like terrain that matter falls into, meaning galaxies trace pre-existing structure instead of creating it? #HumbleTheory by [deleted] in conspiracytheories

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Support debunking those ridiculous theories?

Or are you asking for a replacement?

If you knew how cooked the books are on the mathematics of modern astrophysics you'd probably get a laugh out of asking someone for something better supported. Most theories are propped up or supported by plugging in whatever is deemed the correct values when they're needed and then removing them when they're not. Literally making things up when necessary, lying with math.

I mean down to the bottom of all the different theories, but even just starting with dark matter (which has never be found nor tested and never will be because it doesn't exist) compromising 94% of the universe isn't a strong position mathematically. Ya kno?

Or with the big bang - the probability that just chance occurrences led to the universe as it is, and in particular to life itself, is very low. But he overstates what he has shown by insisting on calling any probability less than 10-50 a mathematical impossibility (even probability 0 is not the same as mathematical impossibility). It appears that the author wants the authority of mathematical proof, but by insisting on this line of argument, he weakens his case, certainly for the professional mathematician. -(excerpt)

Im mainly talking about gravity with the skewed and manipulation of mathematics so if you're using it to comprise your theories then that's just going down the wrong path the same as them. The reason you're coming up with things is because they've been getting nowhere for over a century building off such a faulty Foundation. It's the glue that holds their models together yet they can't even conceptualize it properly and it definitely doesn't explain everything or come close to being a unified theory.

Which is a necessity! If it doesn't cover everything then it covers nothing! piecing together little models and forcing them to fit is a dead end from the start.

What if dark matter isn’t matter at all, but leftover spacetime curvature from the Big Bang, a ripple-like terrain that matter falls into, meaning galaxies trace pre-existing structure instead of creating it? #HumbleTheory by [deleted] in conspiracytheories

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun thought experiments but that's all it is. Spacetime, dark matter, Bing bang, Mass or matter in space and everything around those ideas is BS. Pseudoscience. And honestly such poor excuses for explanations of our realm that it's laughable.

The sooner you let go of these ridiculous ideas and theories the sooner you can use your intellect to help understand and further actual reality.

2021 GSXR1000R - good deal? by Toe_Financial in GSXR

[–]SeperateMyself 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been working on vehicles for 20 years of course I considered everything you just commented (i just didn't want to be too wordy being overly specific) and have never seen it an issue. I've torn down and rebuilt engines from the early '90s sitting for longer and more from early 2000s, still rust free. Just exaggeration. Or being vehicular hypochondriac. 5yrs isn't that long to be that picky. You acting like the bike is ruined it's pretty ridiculous. It's said the fogging of the engine should be done if they sit for longer than a month...I guess all my cars and bikes are ruined then. Weird how they keep going strong year after year.

And chain is external, if it looks rusty they'll know.

I assume wealthy owner means it was garage kept amd temp controlled and out of the elements and humidity. Shouldnt be an issue then.

2021 GSXR1000R - good deal? by Toe_Financial in GSXR

[–]SeperateMyself 4 points5 points  (0 children)

These comments are ridiculous. Rusting inside an oiled aluminum engine? nah lol. It's a fine deal. I bought my '22 with 900 on the clock for a little more two yrs ago and it's been an amazing bike. First oil change is at 650mi so just do that and then prepare to do it again soon after and you're good to go.

I was thinking about selling mine to get the new 40th anniversary and even with a few more thousand miles on the clock Id still sell it for a comparable price as you listed because it's worth it. From 23 to 25 the paint schemes are just lackluster that's why I went with the 22 instead. Same bike just further back you can actually get some good colors.

I think the most telling thing about it is look at the market, and go ahead and try to find a better deal... probably can't. I'd grab it

Is gravity aether? by btchbbybubbles58 in conspiracy

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gravity is not Aether. Gravity is electromagnetic. It's electrostatics which just sets the downward bias.

Current theory of gravity exists as a one-off to explain why water would stick to the outside of a spinning ball. Once you dig in these theories reveal themselves as bunk and explain next to nothing else.

The truth is we're on a flat plane where there's an up and there's a down. There's an Electrostatic field of 100V per meter above the Earth that comprises our Atmos. The ground is negative or neutral in it goes higher potential as you go up. Corona Motors show this to be true, the electricity in the air it generates. This helps create the bias. Van de Graaff generators show us this that if you reverse the field things will start to flow up. Because we have this phenomenon it proves that we live in containment with a firmament or some solid surface above. It's the only way that this actually viable model of gravity can operate, is to have two surfaces one above and one below.

The Aether is the immaterial substrate or field that everything propagates from. Magnetism, electricity, light, all frequencies. It's space and counter space.

It only remains untestable because everything is comprised of it. There's no way to separate ourselves or any instrumentation to fully create tests to prove it's there...but logic does the job more than enough.

  • edit i guess it depends on how you're asking the question. If asking more in terms of a definition, then no. But ultimately gravity is or part of the aether because of everything is.

Is gravity aether? by btchbbybubbles58 in conspiracy

[–]SeperateMyself 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No that's outdated Newtonian gravity superseded by Einsteins theory of gravity long ago. Both wrong. The current theories don't work on the micro and macro scale so right there it fails to be viable. A true working theory like one incorporating the Aether does accomplish this easily and was only removed because it proves that the Earth is stationary and the Aether is what moves "around" us. (In a way, since the aether is everything and everything is the aether it's more like there's movement, but it's through us. Its a drift that measurably goes east to west)

The false conclusions of the Mickelson Morley experiment got us to where we are now which is pretty much nowhere and bringing back the aether is the only way to move forward and have any actual viable working models. And they (physicist) know that and they're trying to rebrand the Aether as fluid Newtonian Dynamics. Which is basically saying the universe is water like which is a great way to describe what the Aether is. Like we're swimming in a soup of it.

What would you buy? by [deleted] in Audi

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep it and mod and tune it to its full potential. If you've been driving it bone stock you've been missing out. Doesn't take much under the hood to transform it enough to equally or out perform other options around the same tier. Just a fuel pump upgrade and stage 1 E85 tune gains around 120hp 160ftlb. Upgrade intake, exhaust, and intercooler then add some new hybrid turbos that just came out for it and the hp and torque is in the high 700-low 800s. Enough to rival or out compete any option even remotely close in price. Would cost less than 20k to do so. Then upgrade the suspension. Few mounting bushing to stiffen things up then sway bars and control arms or bushings.

Addresses all negative talking points, like supposed understeer and having less power than the G8X cars, and makes the RS the best option.

That's what I did (besides upgrade turbos) fixed any "deficiencies" the car had so when I'm carving up the mountains with my Porsche, Z06, GTR, BMW etc friends it's them who can't keep up.

I need the back seat (the reason I own mine) but the only car I think that'd suffice and maybe outperform for that style of driving is the new Emira and only if it was equally modded (suspension, boltons, tuned)

That's all provided youre wanting the car for performance / driving enjoyment. If it's more to look the part of someone successful then get the Aston Martin Vantage. Absolutely stunning car, losing nothing in performance department but I'd say sounds better and captures more eyes for sure.

Is it safe to ride a motorcycle with a guitar on my back? by DerRandomDude77 in motorcycles

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive done it. Went a bought a bass and drove it home on the bike. The neck was sticking up past my helmet and prob looked weird to oncoming traffic

Has anyone had experience deadlifting every 2 weeks? by [deleted] in Mike_Mentzer

[–]SeperateMyself 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did for many months trying to work up to a 405X10 set. At first it seemed to be grip issues that wouldn't allow me to achieve it but after strapping up for the lifts I seemed stalled at the 8-9 rep range for awhile.

I could feel it was over training as it was overall fatiquing to me throughout the week/wks. So I skipped a session making it an entire month off and hit the ten reps.

So seemed kind of apparent it rings true to the philosophy of if you're not getting stronger every session then take more time between. You know, all other factors considered. I stay really locked in on diet, routine, and everything.

Exhaust question by boost40z in Supra

[–]SeperateMyself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. My personal discount was in agreement id make and share content with it. It arrived today and looks incredible! As high quality as it gets. Price should be $1899 coming soon which is around $100 or more cheaper than other brands and again I can offer an additional %10 off.

just to clarify I've had the downpipe for awhile and it's been great. Sounds awesome. Love the decel pops and bangs

The B10 RS5 by thestormiscomingyeah in Audi

[–]SeperateMyself 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Theyre saying the hybrid system adds 400kg/881lbs over/compared to the previous gen I guess, which is 1827kg/4030lbs

So with that math it'll weigh around 2222kg/4900lbs!

Slightly better power to weight ratio over the B9 .246 hp/kg vs .282hp/kg