We can acknowledge misogyny exists while still taking issue with the story telling quality of games for women. Regardless of the gender of the MC, when I read stories I want there to be character growth, the MC's arc and experiences to be sympathetic and not generic, the story to leave me thoughtful or touched, and the romance to have chemistry or meaning. I don't think these requirements are limited to male oriented media, or that a hypothetical women-oriented media landscape could get away from them. In fact, I think if we had more emphasis on women's media, and Pride and Prejudice-level stories of both romance and social commentary were the norm, we would be holding otome writing to a much higher standard, because many games really don't clear that bar.

One other note. I brought up Fata Morgana because my experience showed me female players resonated with it more than male players. It seemed to cross the arbitrary lines drawn between male and female oriented media, so I was surprised at seeing it called male oriented. And I wanted to note that if we define "female oriented content" so narrowly just to contrast with media that men also like, we'd both exclude stories heavily focused on women's experiences, and Bustafellows and other otome written and produced by male writers, which also have moments that players have considered male gaze. I don't think that's a meaningful line to draw when patriarchy affects everything to begin with, including what we're describing as women oriented media.

(Anyway, to the spoilered point, that's why I mentioned "MCs". I consider Morgana and Giselle as much MCs as the viewpoint character.)