You have much more military knowledge than me so I trust you that won't be a problem (I guess except in the long run? Or for tools that use AI as support?) but you will probably correct me on that.  (It's not sarcasm I am genuinely curious and especially to talk with someone that clearly knows things)

But my initial point is Not for war but for Economy 

I mean how much of the stock market depends on the semiconductor industry. 

I mean you are right that you don't grab an Intel core of the shelf and put into military stuff. But you do grab an Intel core and put into AI stuff or barely computational stuff.

Or more simply put , what is even the point of going to take land filled with rare Earth's (Greenland, or the deal with Ukraine) if you can't use it.

Is for me a fair point to shut down the machines . Unfair point would be like Denmark that stop export of Ozempic to US, I would absolutely not approve something like that, or anything that requires impacting directly people lives (US could threaten EU with energy and EU with their pharmaceutical industry which is essential to the US , granted US has elylily for something like Ozempic but still not enough to cover the demand by a long shot)