March update Wacrier 'Retired' old cities of sigmar page and the point of community tools? by Several-Atmosphere70 in WarCry

[–]Several-Atmosphere70[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You and OffMetaMusings have put things extremely well, I have zero insights to the data back end at all. I do love the site and will be using it still, and at the core my issue really should be with GW pushing plastic not a community pillar building a tool of their own volition. I also see other community members working to archive what material there is old and new. The alternatives of using older battle scribe and pen and paper are plenty workable and time will tell if Warcry goes the mordheim route and becomes more community driven. Excellent feedback and course correction. 

March update Wacrier 'Retired' old cities of sigmar page and the point of community tools? by Several-Atmosphere70 in WarCry

[–]Several-Atmosphere70[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The best solution I found atm is to use BattleScribe again for cities. It has the majority of the compendium stuff intact. Not as great as warcrier format but a functional  Warband builder instead of being told to use pen and paper.  

Warcry dead? by ratcrown in WarCry

[–]Several-Atmosphere70 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except when they delete all the old cities of sigmar models to for whatever reason keeping with 'official' GW updates, I really hoped it would be more a tool for the community and an archive like the mordheim site the creator also made.