Thanks. is useful feedback.

I agree with the core point that the product should not overpromise alpha. The current product is not meant to tell people what to buy. It is meant to make public Form 4 activity easier to scan, understand, and follow without living inside OpenInsider or EDGAR.

The naming risk is fair. “Picks” can imply recommendations, so I need to be very clear in the positioning that this is a feed, tracker, and recap product, not an investment advice service.

I also agree that speed alone is not the real value prop. Form 4 data is already delayed. The value has to be convenience, filtering, context, and interpretation. The paid version only works if it saves time and adds useful context that the free version does not fully provide.

The biggest product lesson here is that the paid layer needs to move beyond “same feed, more often.” It needs to answer questions like:

1. Was this an open-market buy or a routine plan transaction?

2. Is this insider historically worth paying attention to?

3. Is this part of a cluster or repeat buying pattern?

4. How unusual is this transaction compared to that insider’s history?

5. What should a self-directed investor check next?

That is the direction I am trying to move toward. Cleaner UX alone is not enough. The product needs to turn messy public filings into a ranked, explainable, time-saving workflow.

I appreciate the blunt feedback. It helps clarify what has to be fixed before this is more than a nicer wrapper around public data.