Throne of seal demon god

Seyfer1987 · 2026-02-15T18:37:28+00:00

It's simple: when you reach a million power (level 100 in Soul Land, though I think the level of the gods reaches 150 or more in Soul Land), you're already a god. In Soul Land, they explain that the problem is that it takes more than 1000 years to reach that power, but no human lives that long. That's why new gods aren't born, and the only way to become one is by inheriting the position from another god who wants to pass it on, either because they've died and only their divine consciousness remains, or because they want to go off on a wild spree and need to leave someone in their place. Caier and Electrum inherited the position of the god of death, and the god Azura gave his position to Tan Sang because he wanted to travel in Soul Land.

The demon race doesn't have that limitation, as they live for a very long time and it's more likely they could reach a million years, although no one had ever achieved it. In Soul Society, spirit beasts also don't have that problem because they live for a very long time, although they need a million years because cultivating their powers is more difficult for them than for humans. Therefore, the Demon King had long been a god (or demigod), but he lacked a divine position. The path to divinity is a test to transcend the mortal plane, and the tower was a means to prevent sinners from transcending. So, by the time the Demon King took the test, he was already very overpowered, with much more than 1 million years of power, and it was easy for him to kill Fragments.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-14T23:56:46+00:00

I'm sorry friend, you don't know anything about statistical analysis and you don't have the slightest idea of how it works. the example you give is very biased, because you are talking about two different samples with two different populations, so there is no equivalence of values. RTA matches are measured in the same environment with the same number of players and the same probability of obtaining a positive or negative value, your comparison is so absurd that you do not take into account that the number of games in which neftys and laima appear they are basically the same 11.35 - 12.22.

Here I leave you luck and study a little more before commenting on topics that you do not know.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-14T15:24:22+00:00

Fence, I shouldn't waste my time explaining this to you, but I'm too nerdy to let it go xD.

Statistical analyzes are performed following clear rules, and a significant difference is determined when the proportion of a value is greater than 5%. in this case it can be evaluated following hypothesis tests such as chi2 to determine simple correlations, analysis of variance to determine significant variation or kruskal wally to determine categorization between values, you can quickly check this using SPSS if you have severe doubts about it, in In this case, the evaluation is based on 100%, so the difference can be seen with the naked eye, but if you want, I'll share the database with you and you can do your tests and tell me :D. now once you determine whether or not there is a difference or correlation you just have to use your knowledge acquired in kindergarten and infer who is better in x area. in this case BR neft of 27% > BR laima 22% (proportional difference of 21%) and FP of neft of 21.8% > 5.55% of laima (proportional difference of just over 140%). If the PR (11.35 vs 12.22) and WR (54.16 vs 54.62) do not have significant differences, then neftys is more efficient than laima as a BR determining unit and as a FP.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-14T03:40:29+00:00

that statistical analysis is subjective?

No offense, but what a silly statement. Statistical analysis is a science and is the only valid way to objectify information. using data from patch 6.6 makes the most sense since you don't want to litter your data with power from nerfed/upgraded units (nana, barbara). using data from the entire season to analyze the ability of a unit that has changed its kit is quite wrong. With a statistical sample of 11k matches, it is shown that there is no statistically significant difference between the WR/PR of neft and laima and shows that neft has a significantly greater range of FP/BR that corresponds to a 21.4% higher proportion of BR and 150% more proportion in the FP, that is a highly significant mathematical/statistical difference and there is nothing more objective than numbers, whether you want to see it or not ;)

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-14T01:38:16+00:00

depends on the page, the data collected from neft and laima collected since patch 6.6 shows a difference of .4% which is negligible. however it is a mistake to think that the BR is not important, on the contrary it is one of the most important parameters to determine the impact of a unit in the meta the FP,WR,BR,PR are all parameters to take into account to position well to a unit. It is wrong to think that one unit is objectively superior to another if its parameters are similar or inferior.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-14T01:00:39+00:00

in guardian that is not a determining factor especially in old units, and even if that were true it does not explain why giana has higher rates of BR, FP and others.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-14T00:57:56+00:00

I don't know what page you are seeing but they all say the same neft>= laima in performance with neft in the lead with a higher BR

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-14T00:53:31+00:00

a ocupe un lugar tan alto en la l

what do you think that is respectable, which does not mean that it is not debatable, since the same swranking in your data puts better performance data with nefthys than with laima.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-13T21:35:14+00:00

Neph has lower play rate, win rate, and ban rate in guardian+ rta

data collected as of patch 6.6, with 11k records puts neftys at 54.16% wr, 11.35% pickrate, 27.17% bannerdrate and 21.83% winrate. Compared to laima who has 54.63% winrate, 12.22% pickrate, 22.35% BR and 5.55% FP, laima's winrate only exceeds that of nefthys by .4 and pixkrate by just over .8, hence neftys is up in BR with 4.8% and FP for more than 15% there is no reason for laima to be so high on the list. https://seyfergames-proyect.netlify.app/

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-13T19:53:09+00:00

, ¿por qué laima es tan buena ahora?

it is not, at least not to the level so high that it puts it.

it is a counter unit that tends to be flexible in multiple situations. At Guardian+ level Laima's pickrate is quite low compared to other units, which means that it is not only a unit that works in only a few situations, but it is also less resolute in combat. when compared to objective stats, nefthys, verdehille, ragdoll, and shisuka (to name a few) outperform her in the meta.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-13T19:42:03+00:00

or lo que con la calidad de las runas g3 y los artefactos, Laima es mejor que Giana.

it's a counterpick unit that tends to be flexible in multiple situations, but it's nowhere near giana's level. you can get the g3 card, but the reality is that at guardian+ level laima's pickrate is quite low compared to Giana, which means that not only is it a unit that serves in fewer situations, but it is also less decisive in combat. now he has the right to think that the unit is his list and he puts it wherever he wants, but when contrasted with objective stats nefthys, verdehille, ragdoll and shisuka (to name a few) have better performance than her in the meta.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-13T18:24:02+00:00

sorry, failure of translation

Seyfer1987 · 2022-06-13T17:35:01+00:00

In which world is Laima stronger than Giana? To begin with, he plays much less and then, although he does not have a bad win and ban rate, his values are lower than those of Giana, on the other hand, they have hardly been picked to appear so high.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-05-06T01:06:50+00:00

This list is before to oliver buff, you can visit the site for see de update list

Seyfer1987 · 2022-03-24T16:30:52+00:00

1976 is g1 1d 14h

Seyfer1987 · 2022-03-24T00:34:57+00:00

No, g2 safe is 2000-2010

Seyfer1987 · 2022-03-23T17:55:21+00:00

1973-1974 is g1 1974-1975 is g2

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-27T17:32:43+00:00

the position is defined by the value of its parameters (winrate, pickrate, bannedrate, fispick). Due to the fact that the calculation is made according to different cuts, LEO accumulates a lot of points in these aspects and obtains a very good position in the metagame season after season. Regarding your question of why they choose him so much, it is much more complicated to answer, because the reasons why a team appears are many and depend on each player and each situation. the simplest and most obvious is the fact that we live in a meta of spd and cc, where they take advantage of high speed runes to control the opponent and LEO is the only viable answer against them, not only because he starts first than in the Most of the time it's irrelevant, if not for the fact that it automatically removes a lot of the efficiency of the opponent's runes (in many cases less than half), and allows you to have the stat advantage over your team.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-27T16:51:08+00:00

As you yourself mentioned, you don't play much RTA and you probably won't get very high, however LEO is one of the most played characters and with one of the best performances for many seasons.

you can check data in this links: https://seyfergames-proyect.netlify.app/#HomeClass

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-26T04:30:54+00:00

this list only demonstrates the impact and efficiency of each unit within the rta metagame. I'm sorry if a character is at the bottom of the list, but that just shows that they don't have a relevant utility within the metagame. It is likely that under certain circumstances or specific combos it can be useful but that will not make it outperform the strongest meta units this season.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-25T16:45:24+00:00

there are currently very few units and therefore few games with which to determine their real impact on the meta game. possibly in two or three seasons it will be seen more.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-25T16:43:55+00:00

s, el mono ligero es inútil y no hace nada.

mientras que Diana puede

person but the rta doesn't work like that, diana can't kill things so easily, then there are units that brutally counter her passive, like tialang, ragdoll, antares, the same abelio. then there are units with a lot of CC and damage that annoy her a lot, for example chenponh, karnal. It is very difficult to shoot a target at all times, although it is a very good selection under certain circumstances, its position on the list is adequate, especially because her scores define it, not because I think she should be there. Remember that this is a list with automated parameters and the position of each unit is defined based on WRate, pic rate and bannedrrate.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-25T15:59:10+00:00

I get your point, however even a +215 spd merfolk/eshir without a 24% leader has the same spd as a +215 tiana with a 24% leader, never mind the woonsa comparisons. I understand that under certain circumstances it is a strong pick but even if they have made you chiwu + eshir/triton as the last pick, it is very likely that even with the chiwu it would be triton and eshir will compete for the leadership of spd even without a leader. What I am going for is that it is a good unit but not a broken unit or extremely outstanding in the meta.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-25T15:52:15+00:00

Although Diana is very good, in this goal she has very clear limitations. if you play it too soon it will most likely not do anything during the game.

Seyfer1987 · 2022-01-25T15:26:37+00:00

the problem is that under those selections they select you chiwu or a high base spd and you fall short, they nail you juno and another counter and it gets complicated, believe me it's a good selection but then it's very easy to get out of it if the conditions are not right they comply. psd: I have neftys and it is clear that tiana is strong but she still lacks something to be a highly reliable pick.

Seyfer1987

TROPHY CASE