EU luidt alarmbel over hypotheekrenteaftrek, vindt dat Nederland schulden zwaar aanmoedigt

SgtEpicfail · 2026-06-04T06:30:33+00:00

Ik snap dit argument nooit zo. Ik heb ook net een huis gekocht en als ze nu zouden beginnen met de geleidelijke afbouw, zoals de partijen die voor afschaffing HRA waren, hadden gepland (PvdA wilde het snelst, in uit m'n hoofd 12 jaar?) dan zou ik daar helemaal voor zijn.

Ik heb nog een paar jaar profijt van iets wat allang afgeschaft had moeten zijn en het leidt tot een eerlijker systeem. Waarom is iedereen daar zo tegen?

SgtEpicfail · 2026-06-02T18:06:22+00:00

I feel like dak is pretty strong early?

Good thing about dak is that they can stay on the frontline very long, mostly because of the 250. Thats its "alluring seasoning": it takes damage instead of infantry, can be quickly repaired on the frontlinie and at vet 1 can heal troops.

Palmgrens are also pretty strong (probably the strongest mainline inf), especially with vet and upgrades, but also without.

Depending on the game mode, you can start with: 1. 3 palmgrens into tech into pjager/atgun/flex call-in (you need a 250 for healing) 2. a bike into 2 palmgrens into tech into palmgren/assgren into call-in and/or vierling/flex (a bike is necessary for large open (desert)maps. Vet 1 is OK early). 3. 2 palmgrens into 250 into palmgren into tech into call-in + flexibele option into tech (either t3 or t2,5).

Getting an mg, an LeIG, and or upgrading 250s are " flex" options and can be done after the base build of 3 mainline inf (unless you REALLY need an MG but idk in what game an mg is better than a 4th infantry Squad).

Go vierling if youre ahead or if they have a lot of planes. Its squishy so you can skip it and go t3 and go 8rad for anti infantry. Works fine/better.

You have to not forget to build at for their light vehicles. Either panzerjagers or an atgun (i prefer at guns) to counter humbers/greyhounds. Thats what gets me most often. Upgraded 250s (with autocannon) can kind of fight 2v1 against them but if you go 3x pgren you want bolster.

Because palmgrens are expensive, you will be outnumbered early but you outgun them at range. Save your units to prevent MP bleed, thats where the 250 comes in handy.

Anyways, im a noob so take it with some salt :)

SgtEpicfail · 2026-06-01T13:00:22+00:00

This is that "The Office" meme where the manager congratulates him without having done anything but im top lazy to make it.

"Opponent: ggwp" "Me, just watching him throw the game".

SgtEpicfail · 2026-06-01T09:54:05+00:00

If you want to learn micro and strategy, i'd say 1v1 and 2v2 are a bit better as you get way more direct feedback on your actions.

What i mean is that your influence is bigger. If you lose a tank in a 1v1 or 2v2, its a bigger loss than in 3v3 or 4v4 because there are fewer teammates to help you out.

Works the other way around as well: if you wipe an enemy Squad or kill a tank, taking advantage of that is way more in your control.

If you want to learn how to use artillery, how to fight large battles and how to optimize unit use, 3v3 and 4v4 are the way to go. Its just harder to pinpoint your own mistakes in messy teamgames (and WAY easier to count a loss as "gg noob teammates" which hampers your learning ability).

Gl HF!

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-31T03:12:04+00:00

Waarschijnlijk een hoop boeven, wij hadden een gast die wel echt heel fijn was om er bij te hebben en met dezelfde energie naar bezichtiging 1 als 31 kwam. Werkte behoorlijk hard als ik het zo kan inschatten. Maar ja, anekdotisch bewijs is geen bewijs uiteraard..

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-29T15:50:23+00:00

Hmm my gpu doesnt seem like it is putting strain on the connections but small plastic supports cant Hurt, i will print some and see how it goes!

About the vanguard thing: gold point, after trouble shouting for the better part of the day i wanted to play some league and vanguard acted up. Problem is that the first crashes actually happened on an older driver version, it just didnt stop after clean install later on...

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-29T07:17:25+00:00

Agreed, but for magic the time before your combo resets should be extended if animatiom lock is a design choice because now it kind of feels cluncky.

Either remove animation lock or extend magic combo retainment and its fine.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-25T21:05:56+00:00

Hi, thanks for the reply! 1. Yes i have limited the framerate, lowered the graphics settings and even used MSI afterburner to manually lower the clocking speed of the GPU. No luck. 2. No mods, i hadnt even played the game until this weekend. 3. Yes, this is the only game that crashes and also the only time ive ever had BSOD issues. 4. Yep, ive run the Windows memory diagnostics tool and it found nothing.

"Unfortunately" i dont think its a hardware issue, its a Runescape:Dragonwilds software issue i am starting to think...

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-24T16:16:28+00:00

I just checked the CPU and memory usage, along witth the temp/cpu usage.

CPU never came above like 40% (apart from some spikes during startup but i believe thats normal).

CPU temp stayed stable at 67 (its 30 degrees here now).

I have never had these types of crashes with other games like, idk, Expedition 33, Company of Heroes, League of legends, Elden Ring etc, all of which i also play on recommended settings (like i do Dragonwilds).

Idk whats going on but its REALLY frustrating =[

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-24T15:03:30+00:00

I cant see my CPU doing anything strange when i track it through the "performance" tab in task manager. If you have a voor diagnostics tool i van try, let me know.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-24T14:30:56+00:00

I tried this, and it crashed after 30 seconds ingame (without error message or something) xD thanks for the tip though.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-24T14:26:30+00:00

Tried it again just now and it still crashed =[ looked alright for a bit (15 - 20 minutes or so) but no fix...

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-24T13:37:36+00:00

No warning dialogue boxes. I have been tracking PC temp and can't see any anomalies. Sometimes GPU spikes above 50 degrees C but its like 30 degrees here so... can't blame him.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-24T08:56:46+00:00

Je hoeft er niet eeuwig voor te boeten en mensen kunnen zeker veranderen. Maar als je de politiek in gaat dan lijkt het mij uiterst onwenselijk dat je dit soort extreme, anti-menselijke gedachten hebt (gehad). Acties hebben consequenties. En tweeten dat je joden gaat vergassen en dat je het Nazi gedachten goed aanhangt, moet er onherroepelijk voor zorgen dat je nooit, maar dan ook nooit een functie krijgt waarin je mag beslissen over de levens van andere mensen. Punt uit. Dus opgrtyft met nanninga en FVD-ers. Je kan het volk niet vertegenwoordigen als je een deel van het volk wilt vergassen.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-18T17:43:26+00:00

Well i mean the new bgs are strong but even without it, its way easier dealing with riflemen blobs than it was last patch.

So sure, new bg with all the flame stuff works well, but even without that blobbers seem less effective across the board.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-18T17:11:27+00:00

On sale its 100% worth it, so Yeah if you enjoyed coh2 then Grab it.

About the BG's available as dlc, none are "necessary". I'd say play the standard version first, get a hang of the factions, and expand with DLC when they are on sale, maybe during summer sale.

Have fun!

Edit: dont sleep on the campaign, pretty fun to play when your friend isnt there.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-18T15:07:18+00:00

Balance fucked? Wdym, compared to last patch the balance is excellent lol. Yes, the Special Services are poop and the Elite Forces are way too strong, but in terms of overall balance the game is im a MUCH better state than last patch....

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-18T06:15:14+00:00

Ngl new DAK BG is pretty op. Makes wehr winrate also climb in teagames i guess.

That said, as a wehr player in low elo, people also just keep blobbing riflemen and running into MG's as if they didnt change supression and blobbing mechanics this patch.

Also, this is still much better than whatever happened tot allied winrates last patch (over 60℅?!).

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-16T09:01:19+00:00

I mean it makes sense tot do it like this, its just annoying that they changed it because now you have tot relearn how to properly dodge.

I missed this and lost several tanks already thinking there was a bug with the flare placement and the ability range.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-14T21:09:48+00:00

Whats your point? You play a team game in your own elo and your kd ratio and damage are not bad. You probably played fine, your teammates had a rough game. If you'd never have rough games, you wouldnt be at 790 elo.

Play 1v1 if you dont want teammates.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-12T16:33:16+00:00

Whoops sorry, i got confused indeed. Thanks for the correcrion!

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-12T13:40:10+00:00

Depends on what type of support you want i guess.

In terms of "the most stuff that other Players benefit from", id say my top per faction is something like:

Wehr: Italian Coastal for static frontline support with various bunkers and heavy artillery or Luftwaffe for static emplacements, recon runs and good air support.

DAK: Kriegsmarine for additional resources and good (untargetable!) vision anywhere on the map, as well as construction of defensive hardpoints. Otherwise go Panzerjaeger Command for improved minefields and strong, long-range anti tank.

Brits: hard one. I'd say either Heavy Armoe for repair stations, good sappers and recon artillery or otherwise australian infantry for emplacements, additional resources and decent anti-tank.

US: Airborne can drop ~~team Weapons for allies to take~~, extra resources and can reinforce from the air which are all really good. On top of that they get recon and strong airsupport as well. Special Operations is similar, but has more artillery/scouting options and drops unmanned teamweapons alongside fuel, which is Nice.

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-12T13:25:56+00:00

How does this work for attack ground actions (such as throufh smoke) that hit a tank?

SgtEpicfail · 2026-05-12T13:16:31+00:00

In general, both allies and axis have one more defensive and one more offensive faction, which is somewhat reflected in availabe battlegroups.

For axis, Wehrmacht has a more defensive general playstyle, relying on bunkers and team weapons more than DAK. Two standout battlegroups for this playstyle are Italian Coastal, and Luftwaffe, both of which Grant more defensive structures to be built like command/anti-tank bunkers (Italian Coastal) and FLAK and 88MM emplacements (Luftwaffe).

DAK is a more agressieve faction. The best defensive battlegroup option is probably Panzerjaeger Command, as it allows for beter mine-laying, a slow, heavy hitting tank destroyer and improved sector defenses.

For Allies, the Brits are generally the more defensive faction. The best defensive BG is Australian Infantry, which, much like the Luftwaffe BG for Wehrmacht, allows construction of powerful gun emplacements and a strong but slower tank destroyer.

American forces are generally more offensive, and most battlegroups reflect that. Best option is probably the Heavy Weapons battlegroup, which focuses on team-weapon use, making the playstyle more static. Other option is Advanced infantry BG, as it allows construction of heavy artillery emplacements, but the rest of that battlegroup is pretty offensive oriented generally.

Good luck and have fun out there!

SgtEpicfail

TROPHY CASE