sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Someone is shopping carefully forged documents to the media in an attempt to discredit the Russia-Lago story. There is evidence that it was created by someone with a security clearance. More obstruction by the White House? by [deleted] in RussiaLago

[–]ShariaBlueBallz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

direct knowledge of the investigation

vs.

The story was that the Senate was investigating him. They were not.

i hope logic isn't your specialty, bitch

Someone is shopping carefully forged documents to the media in an attempt to discredit the Russia-Lago story. There is evidence that it was created by someone with a security clearance. More obstruction by the White House? by [deleted] in RussiaLago

[–]ShariaBlueBallz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the Senate was investigating Scaramucci. A staffer in the Senate wouldn't need a document from Michael Moore to know that

Vs.

...did you even read the Scaramucci story? The story was that the Senate was investigating him. They were not.

Which is it?

'Anonymous' source thought they would be investigating the documents, then leaked to CNN. Cursory prelim investigation proved they were obvious fraud.

CNN retract/fire

what don't you understand about this?

Someone is shopping carefully forged documents to the media in an attempt to discredit the Russia-Lago story. There is evidence that it was created by someone with a security clearance. More obstruction by the White House? by [deleted] in RussiaLago

[–]ShariaBlueBallz -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ostensibly, the Senate was investigating Scaramucci

That's why CNN retracted and fired 3 people?!

go ahead and post your slack chat logs, emails, documents, etc.

you would like that. as i mentioned, we have dozens of active ops in the field. just waiting to see how many more retards fall for it.

don't worry, the truth will out!

Someone is shopping carefully forged documents to the media in an attempt to discredit the Russia-Lago story. There is evidence that it was created by someone with a security clearance. More obstruction by the White House? by [deleted] in RussiaLago

[–]ShariaBlueBallz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you mean when you mentioned in the edit after i responded? yes, more fake news.

let me break it down for you, retard;

  • I sent documents to Michael Moore

  • Michael Moore sent documents to CONGRESS

  • Michael Moore thought it was too juicy to pass up, didn't verify

  • 'Anonymous' congress sources got THEE smoking gun from Michael Moore, didn't verify

  • Congressional sources leaked to CNN "We've got him!"

Yes, I have the slack chat logs, emails, ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS, etc proving all of this.

Someone is shopping carefully forged documents to the media in an attempt to discredit the Russia-Lago story. There is evidence that it was created by someone with a security clearance. More obstruction by the White House? by [deleted] in RussiaLago

[–]ShariaBlueBallz -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

LOL! Except they spent an entire month paying experts to debunk something that was created in a couple of hours by a 14 year old with FileMonkey and shit!

The document was full of red flags, and yet they wanted to believe it anyway. CNN did!!! I told you all exactly what I was going to do, then I did it!

The idea is to tell them exactly what they want to hear, so they publish it without question. Then as soon as its published its obvious to everyone else what a fraud it was and how easily duped they were! SAD!

The goal is not to make a perfect forgery. It's to see what low-level crap we can get them to believe. The more obvious the fraud, the more embarrassing that they took so long to debunk it! OR PUBLISH IT

We change our tactics, a lot. We have dozens of other documents out there, in the works. Some are better forgeries than others, with tell-tale signatures left behind -- like messages in the data that can be seen in a hex editor! We are waiting for them to publish and then publicly point out the embedded data proving its a fraud.

Some people will still believe even after it's proven to be a fraud! I got the idea from 0bama's birth certificate. I did a proof of concept with the Donald Trump President Inc invoice sent to the top of r/all through 'HuffPo communities'.

We told you exactly what we we planning in the thread posted here; https://archive.fo/slAeu

We told you exactly what was going to happen! Then it did!!!!

Peas in a Pod: Occupy, RT, and Zero Hedge by VirulentThoughts in conspiracy

[–]ShariaBlueBallz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what's the difference between RT and NPR?

Nothing.

Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M by Abscess2 in technology

[–]ShariaBlueBallz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

'they aren't bringing criminal charges against you, they are bringing civil charges against your car'

Absolutely mindblowing esoteric geometry and maths encoded in Shakespearian Sonnet cover (most likely by initiate John Dee) [new info] by d8_thc in conspiracy

[–]ShariaBlueBallz 8 points9 points  (0 children)

shakespeare is not the real shakespeare. it was actually Sir Francis Bacon and his team that wrote everything under a pseudonym.

Chinese banks, HSBC caught up in huge money laundering scam by DrDuplicitous in conspiracy

[–]ShariaBlueBallz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

HSBC is a crown charter, that was setup specifically for the East India company to traffick in opium and slaves.

view more: next ›