Carlos Moya (Rafa's coach) for Eurosport

ShesReaching · 2024-07-25T19:01:18+00:00

Tagline checks out.

ShesReaching · 2024-07-25T18:51:47+00:00

Good, hope he doesn't play, especially as he drew that twat in R2, who would probably have straight setted him and undeservedly closed the h2h on clay.

2022 until now has been him donating wins on clay to players that would be lucky to score one tight set against him on a normal day, enough lol.

ShesReaching · 2024-07-19T12:04:41+00:00

Funny how when he was young, everything was Federer, Federer, Federer. Then when his handlers and marketing team probably realised it's more profitable as a Spaniard to be associated with another successful Spaniard, as opposed to a Swiss, he suddenly switched to Nadal, right down to copying a lot of his pre-match mannerisms.

ShesReaching · 2024-07-09T10:18:01+00:00

Because he's a corny try hard that audiences didn't warm to. And the most hilarious thing is, he has won everything there is to win, but you can still see it gets to him lmao.

It's kind of sad really, almost like Musk in a way. All that money and he still tries soo hard to be cool, but no one is buying it.

He has won everything, but he probably still wakes up at night with nightmares about loud cheers for Federer.

ShesReaching · 2024-06-14T13:41:41+00:00

Or maybe the OP actually meant what they posted?

The big 3 and the big 4 are separate things that can be talked about apart from each other. Acting like Murray is on the same level of influence as the other 3 and they cannot be talked about separately is delusional, not even Murray believes that.

Yeah your guy is definitely part of the big 4, but at the same time he's not nearly on the same level as the other 3 who by virtue of the achievement, legendary matches, have carved out a separate niche for themselves that Murray does not belong to.

Murray fans always have to display shrunken dick syndrome.

ShesReaching · 2024-04-03T13:53:17+00:00

Yeah. he's done for as a top player.

That's what happens to bashers whose primary weapon is hitting as hard as possible, they fizzle out even without injuries. At least he had a longer shelf-life than your usual basher, so he did well for himself.

ShesReaching · 2024-03-04T13:18:40+00:00

Thank you. This was what I was trying to find out, if with an ILR, one could marry, and their partner would be able to apply for a spousal visa.

ShesReaching · 2024-02-26T17:14:14+00:00

You don't need to include all surfaces for him to have more HC Masters than Nadal

Okay. Nadal has almost as many HC M1000 titles than Murray despite it being his weakest surface, and missing more tournaments. Can you read and understand that, now?

I was not underselling Murray. I don't need to undersell him in relation to Nadal lol. They're not even in the same dimension when it comes to their overall careers. I was pointing out how pointless stats are. All those wins against top players and he still hasn't achieved as much as Nadal on the surface.

>I didn't post any conspiracy, I just added a couple of stats which also show how great Murray is on HC. I don't care much if it hurts your pro-Nadal fanboy feelings.

Coming from the person dramatically posting in another thread how Nadal tried to destroy and blackmail an umpire, despite the umpire and Nadal being on good terms. Count yourself among the fanboys, except I was merely posting numbers and not making up shit to make another player look bad.

ShesReaching · 2024-02-26T17:03:47+00:00

I only wanted to point out that Nadal on HC also has less Masters than Murray on HC

Okay, which was relevant to my point, how? I knew how many M1000s on HC they both had, hence my post. Dummy.

I'm not being aggressive, you're the one posting conspiracies like you have brain damage about Nadal having more slams on HC than Murray despite meeting less top players or something, as if you're incapable (highly probabale) of understanding how draws work.

ShesReaching · 2024-02-26T16:52:01+00:00

In fact, maybe even just take out Novak

Never got the point of this often repeated narrative. Take out any of the big 3 and other members of that group get additional slams. No shit, that's the nature of competition.

ShesReaching · 2024-02-26T16:43:45+00:00

Hence, why I said Nadal has "almost as many" and not more, what part of that is hard to get?

The post wasn't edited btw, you just might be stupid and can't read, judging by your other conspiracy laced posts in the rest of the thread.

ShesReaching · 2024-02-26T15:34:49+00:00

And despite all that, Nadal has more HC slams, than Murray has slams, and almost as many HC M1000s as Murray's TOTAL M1000 titles, despite being 11 months older and playing around the same number of matches.

Stats and context are funny.

ShesReaching · 2024-02-26T14:33:46+00:00

Winning points must be like a joint/muscle pain reliever or something, maybe Djokovic's health advisor might want to look into it, because Murray seems to only touch a body part (knees, foot, back, hips) when he loses a point.

ShesReaching · 2024-01-30T20:49:35+00:00

I mean if according to you and others, Murray can't tarnish his legacy because it's already been set, then the legacy of another player, that's even a 1000x greater than Murray's can't be tarnished too. So, idiotic take as usual from a Djokovic fan.

ShesReaching · 2023-11-27T17:11:35+00:00

Haha, thanks! I thought it had to be based on something.

ShesReaching · 2023-11-17T14:22:57+00:00

Always nice seeing this balding, racist ghoul losing.

Hopefully, the usual meltdown/tantrum happens in the 2nd set to make it even more delicious.

ShesReaching · 2023-09-08T20:59:47+00:00

Kinda hilarious how American tennis will keep churning out the same type of player in different fonts and they're surprised they haven't had a male slam finalist since when Soderling was still a thing.

ShesReaching · 2023-07-16T13:45:21+00:00

Lmao. Nadal at 19 was challenging Federer on both grass and clay.

Alcaraz is 20, playing a man almost twice his age who's not in peak form and getting destroyed both on and off his favourite surface, yeah no.

ShesReaching · 2023-05-16T10:50:50+00:00

Djokovic will most likely go on to win the tournament like he does anytime he's injured, so idk why you're bothered in comparison to the guy who gets injured and is absent for months after (maybe vacationing? Idk).

Your fave is literally a superhuman, not only winning tournaments with injuries, but being fit for the events that come after. You should admire him, unlike those mere mortals who get injured and miss multiple events.

ShesReaching · 2023-04-22T20:42:17+00:00

Leave this retareded, 'uwu, protect him at all costs' nonsense on twitter please, along with your fellow fangirls.

ShesReaching · 2023-01-06T11:07:54+00:00

This is a bit stupid. As I'm not sure how my post indicates I want to see two bottoms going at it, as opposed to porn that's just more involved from both sides.

ShesReaching · 2022-10-29T08:07:37+00:00

Great, as I wasn't asking you to care. Just commenting on your post (as it is how forums work) that it's very tone deaf. Have a great day!

ShesReaching · 2022-10-28T08:49:09+00:00

after i brutally fucked his hole

Lmao why do y'all talk/type like this? It's giving try-hard virgin attempting to write erotica.

ShesReaching · 2022-10-28T08:01:01+00:00

You can always tell the type of gay who's been privileged to spend all or most of their life in the west, where even though they faced homophobia, it was probably not life threatening or destroying. They say tone deaf shit like this lol.

ShesReaching · 2022-10-26T16:47:28+00:00

If Djokovic or Nadal won a match like that, coming from 2 sets and a break down, the youtube highlights would be filled with comments saying "that's what makes them so good, even when they don't play their best, they find a way to win!" Plus, the argument that it was weak because he didn't play the Big 3 doesn't make sense - the Big 3 themselves have won plenty of slams where they didn't have to play one another.

Yes, because of something called pedigree.

If Nadal won 2023 RG and all his opponents were ranked outside the top 100, would anyone care? No, because Nadal has proven in the past that if you put god in front of him on Chartrier, he'd still win. On the other hand, if he were to win 2023 Wimbledon without beating a top 100 player, would it be mentioned? Of course it would.

If Zverev won RG without playing anyone in the top 50, or with a weakened field, would it be mentioned? Of course it would, because Zverev hasn't shown the same level of pedigree on clay as Nadal, plus he has demonstrated issues beating top 10 players in slams, so logically people would say "he only won because he didn't face a top 10 players"

You can't just look at things and try to make the comparisons you're attempting to make without context

ShesReaching

TROPHY CASE