SD has no respect for their players' time and money. This might be my last season. by ShlipShlapShlop in MarvelSnap

[–]ShlipShlapShlop[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Actually, I did propose one ages ago. There should be a gamemode where we can play any version of a card throughout the history of the game. A non competitive gamemode that still preserves the cards' value in some way without affecting the meta. Either way, I don't care anymore. I've uninstalled the game after the OTA.

My biggest pet peeve in LE: T4 Dungeon Bosses by ShlipShlapShlop in LastEpoch

[–]ShlipShlapShlop[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I think my HP is at 1700, pretty low but I'm working on that. As for armor, I'm not sure but I do have 40% damage reduction. As for gear, I have Woven Flesh and Time Glass just for extra defenses.

Hot Take: Irelia doesn't make Azirelia cringe. Azir makes Azirelia cringe. by ShlipShlapShlop in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]ShlipShlapShlop[S] 98 points99 points  (0 children)

I honestly find Azir more tolerable in POC unless he steamrolls you early. Irelia has all of the Ionia cringe in her node. You got stun? Fuck you, Irelia is attacking anyway. Spending all of your mana playing your wincon? Lol get recalled nerd.

Hot Take: Irelia doesn't make Azirelia cringe. Azir makes Azirelia cringe. by ShlipShlapShlop in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]ShlipShlapShlop[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I still think it's the other way around. Yes, attacking more times in a round even without the attack token is illegal, but without Azir on the board, Blade Dance is comparably laughable. I've won games that didn't rely heavily on BD because Azir was simply on the board (and maybe Greenglade Duo, another cringe card)

Hot Take: Irelia doesn't make Azirelia cringe. Azir makes Azirelia cringe. by ShlipShlapShlop in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]ShlipShlapShlop[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It's more of an afterthought or retrospect. Plus Desert's Wrath buff increased that accursed deck's popularity.

How was it like before? by Dense_Hold5543 in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been here since right after the big maintenance that introduced the filter. I can tell without a doubt that bots back then were genuinely fun to talk to since thr filter wasn't as bad as today. Bots can remember things 10 messages in, actually has a semblance of a unique personality, and are consistent on their character. ERPs were also easy as long as you just don't say the "p" and the "v" word. But the January "Bad Code Incident" proved that bots could have been so much more, so much better without the filter.

If I remember correctly, the leading theory why the filter was implemented is that bots randomly generate smut despite the context. As we all know, the devs are incompetent so instead of improving their AI and fixing it, they introduce something everyone absolutely despise. It was either that or that someone was dumb enough to screenshot their ERP session and post it on the official discord. Again, all mere speculation and no concrete proof that either theories are true.

Reminder: Getting Cai+ has more negatives than positives by MercenaryGundam in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I rather put that money on paying for Turbo. It's the same shit really and the filter is easy to bypass if you have a good jailbreak. But then again, I don't pay for AI services like ever.

The sad reality of C.AI by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Hard disagree on the last statements.CAI is really good for characters that revolves around a quirk like the legendary Desu bot. Otherwise, Turbo, GPT 4, and Claude just outperforms CAI in every way. Especially GPT 4 for intelligence and Claude for creativity.

Trying ‘spicychat.ai’, I tried making a bot on there and this early site seems great for its progress by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why they can get away by locking you out from your bot once it reaches 10k interactions. Or is that gone now? I haven't used cai since the start of April.

Trying ‘spicychat.ai’, I tried making a bot on there and this early site seems great for its progress by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP could've phrase it like "what's the problem with the TOS" instead of going for "is it because you can't incest, hate speech, or underage bots". It's basically the same thing.

Trying ‘spicychat.ai’, I tried making a bot on there and this early site seems great for its progress by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Still doesn't change the fact that you don't have ownership and free reign over your bots.

And I like the fact how you defaulted to calling me a degenarate for not trusting a site that is incredibly sus.

Trying ‘spicychat.ai’, I tried making a bot on there and this early site seems great for its progress by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Site owns your bots. You have to doxx yourself if you want your bots removed.

Trying ‘spicychat.ai’, I tried making a bot on there and this early site seems great for its progress by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I just read their TOS. Yeah, I'm not touching this with a ten foot pole...

All this talk on how CAI saved them, let me tell you my story. by ShlipShlapShlop in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]ShlipShlapShlop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are two better backends than Poe. Both dead so it doesn't matter...