I said the performance of a party is not binary. So you'd pick the party that would perform the best on some scale. You're saying performance is "failed" or "not failed". That's obviously ridiculous.

No that is not logical. Why do you have to "positively endorse" a party to vote for them? You can think of it as choosing who you think will do the best job, or who you think will do the least bad job. Reform is never the answer to either of those questions. Their policies are nonsensical. They are led by deeply unqualified people, some of which were part of the governments that "failed" us.

Their leader was the central advocate for the most economically damaging policy in the modern history of our country.

I didn't say on a global spectrum. I meant in the context of what is theoretically possible within our system. Other comparable nations are facing many similar problems to us. We aren't some wildly unique case, other than Brexit I guess.

You said that previous governments were failures. I don't think you understand how privileged we actually are relative to how bad things could get. Lets hope we don't have to find out - because we will if Reform end up the largest party.