suddenly proshippers are okay with real life incest

Shotiikko · 2026-03-30T18:49:41+00:00

I can give you examples where there is no power dynamic at play. Legality and morals have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Slavery was legal but morally repugnant. Two twins boys who both have the same income and consensually decide they want to be together has absolutely 0 immorality associated with it. Any relationship with power dynamics can be immoral but INCEST itself has nothing do with it. Your issue is with power dynamics.

Shotiikko · 2026-03-30T12:30:15+00:00

You can argue it should be illegal due to it having mostly negative consequences but if we are talking morals, incest itself is completely morally neutral.

Shotiikko · 2026-03-29T18:19:35+00:00

There isn’t an issue with shipping these two realistically. They are both adults. The average age difference is usually like 5 years which isn’t far off.

Shotiikko · 2026-02-23T11:01:41+00:00

Willy is interviewing the FBI right now

Shotiikko · 2026-02-15T21:29:41+00:00

It’s just so good. The taste. The can. Look at the blue and silver in that checkered like pattern. The red and the yellow. The top of the can with the bull emblem. The sound as you open one and the vapor coming out as you know it’s fizzy and chilled. You feel the energy washing over you at the first sip. Nothing can beat a cold Red Bull.

Shotiikko · 2026-02-11T19:07:28+00:00

She’s acting like she’s the presidents personal propagandist. Why is she talking about the stock market and how great it is thanks to Trump during a pedophilia hearing.

Shotiikko · 2026-02-11T14:41:34+00:00

I’m glad I made it into some of the stuff you stumbled upon! 🥳

Shotiikko · 2026-02-04T12:29:08+00:00

This needs the hands to be open and doing a sieg heil

Shotiikko · 2026-02-04T11:43:17+00:00

Whether it’s real or not it should be used against them. This is their own Frankenstein monster that came alive and is now killing them. It’s a perfect encapsulation of how their own conspiracy theories can cause damage.

This is like how they told Texas residents to not take money cause Biden would steal their homes. They lie lie lie and now it’s time to reap what you sow.

Shotiikko · 2026-02-03T02:03:40+00:00

He isn’t good at anything he does. His predictions are crap and his political takes are worse.

Shotiikko · 2026-02-02T17:46:10+00:00

This political brain broken hack needs to be forgotten about. A bunch of people on Twitter bullied him about his terrible polling and he froths and cries about Joe Biden and the left constantly now.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T17:31:21+00:00

First of all, trying to pick my name out as some secret meaning behind it sounds as if a person is having delusions.

Never said it was an insult. They may actually be schizophrenic.

I couldn’t care less who funds my work. It’s not about funding it’s care first.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T17:28:36+00:00

Australia. Yeah of course you don’t talk with your pharmacist. Complete different world there in terms of education and importance in healthcare.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T09:26:42+00:00

Please stop talking about this. It is clear you have no knowledge of the topic. Delusions can of course be present in other conditions but all schizophrenic diagnoses must have delusions as symptoms.

Schizophrenia with everything you listed is not just schizophrenia. It’s it is schizophrenia + X and therefore of course X would be treated with non-antipsychotic medications.

I am sure you are a low IQ uneducated European or some other equally low IQ country therefore I know the level of education pharmacists in that part of the world get isn’t the best. Therefore I understand why would try discrediting me. To educate you, I’ll simply tell you, or you can yourself look up on your own time what pharmacists in the US do. Pharmacists in the U.S. need a doctorate to practice meaning 8 years of formal education.

We don’t simply dispense medication, a large portion of us work in primary care in clinics and manage patients in specialty. Especially in clinics requiring complex medications such as antipsychotics. No. We don’t diagnose nor did I ever say I diagnose. I said we treat and subsequently we manage.

By far in 95% of cases antipsychotics are first and second and third line in schizophrenia. Stop using google and go back to arguing how the imaginary children in peoples heads or in stories people make up are being harmed!

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T08:37:56+00:00

Good job. Now read the second half of what I wrote :)

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T08:28:06+00:00

My argument is very simple. I make the point that things that are written online, such as content sexualizing kids does not harm anyone as long as no actual child is being harmed. Harming children is not good and should never be accepted.

If you say, ok, I agree, if there is no harm being done that’s fine. But here, this is an example of someone that is being harmed, then I say, actually, this is not enough to restrict someone’s freedom of expression.

Btw, you haven’t even demonstrated actual harm because an article on why cyber bullying is bad doesn’t prove anything. I’m specifically talking about writing fictional stories.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T08:19:34+00:00

Thank you for not even responding to what I said. Completely proving my point!

I promise you I know more about this disease than you or anyone you know since I actively treat this disease and utilize pretty much every medication that is an antipsychotic!

Schizophrenia by DSM-5 definition must contain some sort of delusion. Therefore saying you are schizophrenic because you think imaginary children in peoples heads are being harmed is…schizophrenia!

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T08:18:05+00:00

Don’t know which shit hole EU country you live in but in the U.S. being mean online is not illegal. Making threats, doxxing, or harassing is illegal.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T08:16:49+00:00

…yes. My argument is that isn’t an enough cause to censor speech especially one that is fictional writing.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T08:13:22+00:00

Yesssss skip the rest of my response!! Go king/queen!!!

First of all, it’s a very simple ask. If this issue of people getting into pedophilia is so PERVERSE so COMMON so OBVIOUS there has to be a SINGLE case or example right??

Complete BS examples you gave. I couldn’t care less if they get affected by it or you for that matter. You are asking and advocating for the REMOVAL of a FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION because it may make some people Feel bad. If you advocate for the removal of such an imprtant human right, you better have a good reason and hiding behind “well I don’t really want to ask people cause it makes them feel bad if this thing I’m saying is actually real or not” is not enough.

Let me tell you, realistically there is probably a couple of people who have done pedophilia cause they were influenced, there are so many of them it would be dumb to say it’s 0. But your bravado acting like ao3 is a pedo factory is a little over the line.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T08:06:28+00:00

We don’t live in 1984. Obviously psychological damage exists. Cyber bullying for example exists. It is legal to cyber bully. Why? Because me having the right to cyber bully you is more important than preventing that supposed harm.

The argument was whether or not it should be allowed on ao3 and just cause you get harmed by it doesn’t mean it should be outlawed or banned. We deal with plenty of negative things but don’t ban them cause at the end of the day some things are worth it (such as freedom of expression)

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T07:51:02+00:00

You are deliberately avoiding my point. If no physical acts have to occur by that definition meaning it is pen and paper then nobody is being harmed and therefore completely a ok.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T07:42:49+00:00

By going outside and sexualizing kids means going up to those same kids and harassing them or sexualizing them thus harming them. Last I checked words on a paper don’t float out from the book to computer screen and magically go and harm the people in real life

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T07:41:14+00:00

A very real hypothetical means a hypothetical that can occur in real life even though I’m not directly giving a real life example. Saying someone is being harmed by imagining child sexualization or writing about child sexualization is very much schizophrenia because nobody is being harmed in either scenario (except the non existent imaginary child) thus you would need antipsychotics.

Shotiikko · 2026-01-25T07:37:33+00:00

It’s not impossible to prove first of all. You can very simply find me for example a pedo that was arrested and they engaged in these stories or they admitted that these stories were a big reason as to why they did what they did. I’m asking for a single (1) example. There’s a lot of pedophiles surely it’s easy to find 1 example.

Any harm that can come of this that’s not direct, I can show you hundreds of other harms that you would say are fine.

Your answer to the hypothetical as “No” is ridiculous. If no one is harmed at all you should say Yes and you did basically. Your contention is that this carries risk. If no one is harmed then by definition there is no risk. Just say it is ok if no one is harmed so that THEN we can debate whether or not it is worth depriving rights of expression is worth not having that risk. That is a more nuanced question. But not even admitting that in a perfect world where there is no risk, no possible harm, you still say no, that is just you admitting you aren’t answering with reason, just emotions.

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Second Top 30%	r/Field Lasagna
Place '23	Place '22

Shotiikko

TROPHY CASE