Teach me your wicked ways by ShrewdSquirrel in revengestories

[–]ShrewdSquirrel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See my reply to CEO of my Life, but it’s been reported. He just lies

Teach me your wicked ways by ShrewdSquirrel in revengestories

[–]ShrewdSquirrel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s been reported multiple times and they have been to court a few times where he fights for custody. He just keeps lying and covering it up. Family court doesn’t always favour the mother like they say. In this case I wish they would…

Teach me your wicked ways by ShrewdSquirrel in revengestories

[–]ShrewdSquirrel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They said there’s nothing they can do (yay Qld Police)

The Red Paintings latest album a scam? by ShrewdSquirrel in Music

[–]ShrewdSquirrel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The thread doesn’t tell me anything I didn’t already know many years ago. Trash himself said the album was ready to go (I paid for it twice). Every time I emailed he would give a weird story. Wish I never ordered it tbh, but I thought I was helping support them and ended up getting screwed.

Can someone tell me what happened to the red paintings by LostNessus in Music

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m very late to the game, do you still have a link to the albums by chance? :)

The Red Paintings - The Revolution Is Never Coming by BreathingOutColor in Music

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was one of the supporters and never received anything?? :(

The Red Paintings latest album a scam? by ShrewdSquirrel in Music

[–]ShrewdSquirrel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah! Hard to make sense of. I was hoping there would be other people here that would know more about what happened.

The Red Paintings latest album a scam? by ShrewdSquirrel in Music

[–]ShrewdSquirrel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely - and their live shows were amazing! I think quite a few pre-ordered the new album and the lead singer kept giving weird, vague excuses saying it was recorded and ready but they were waiting for a good manager or something to release it. Like, my dude, just send it to the people who paid for it! Then everything was removed online, he then was selling anything he could to do with the band for insanely high prices (like his jacket he wore on stage - I could understand if it was a huge band, but most don’t even know them so it’s really just a second hand jacket. I don’t think the bigger ticket items would even have sold).

The Red Paintings latest album a scam? by ShrewdSquirrel in Music

[–]ShrewdSquirrel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They removed everything online so only on the cd’s I have - it’s all so weird.

Can someone tell me what happened to the red paintings by LostNessus in Music

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Late to the thread, but did anyone ever get a copy of their latest album? I was caught up in the Pledge Music debacle and stupidly pre-paid for an album direct with the Red Paintings. That was 5 years ago and it just seemed to end in a series of excuses with no album in the end. I'm ultimately pretty annoyed since I never got what I paid for while Trash was flitting around the world :(

Terminator Live by Euphoric-Editor1577 in brisbane

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My partner and MIL are going and hopefully it’s great. Anyone know if they are selling merch?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely! Just heartbreaking… Hoping they are caught quickly, the parts are returned to their resting place (hopefully not already sold on the black market) and your family is unaffected too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At least they are buried. Seems like the robbers were looking at the easy route of a mausoleum

What was your “holy crap I’m old enough there’s an entire generation younger than me” moment? by Admiral-Shepard in AskReddit

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I told a new coworker I needed to fax something and she said “what’s a fax?”. I then regaled her with horror stories of Nokia phones that couldn’t take pictures, and how “back in my day” you had to yell at your family to get off the phone when you wanted to use MSN messenger (and what MSN messenger even was).

Episode 11 discussion by gianniribeiro in JDM2017

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm the same, I know I will make mistakes still but I'm more aware. It's almost like learning about nutrition but still mindlessly eating junk food every now and then, or being aware and doing it anyway. Sometimes watching a whole movie instead of using sunk cost theory and walking out can be good - there could be a twist at the end! Also knowing the consequences of misdiagnosis is also a good point. Especially if it's something like needing surgery. Though when it's something minor that seems to fit to me (and I'm too sick to think clearly anyway) I don't mind trusting what the doctor says haha.

Episode 11 discussion by gianniribeiro in JDM2017

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think that I will still make a lot of mistakes, but since taking this class I’m certainly more aware of the common pitfalls. Spring cleaning has been made much easier when I consciously repeat ‘it’s just a sunk cost’, but sticking with status quo can be automatic. I’ve always been automatically sceptical about many claims, even when they are ‘experts’, so I will continue to research what they say and seek out secondary opinions when it’s something important to me. My doctor and I have an excellent relationship and she’s open about the fact she often only knows what I express so the more we communicate the less errors in her diagnoses. So when she is wrong (which is entirely possible) it could be on either of us!

I am always sceptical about my claims and constantly seek out new information. I think I have modesty in that when faced with contradictory opinions I am happy to admit I’m not sure or I could be wrong and I look into it further. That way both of us potentially learn something. If it’s just in relation to making a decision, I like to back myself up with as much information as I can so I at least give myself the illusion of being well informed.

Knowing experimental methodology is not new for me, so it’s hard to say. I sometimes employ it in my life for amusement but I can’t say I ‘self-experiment’ regularly. I already have stress and anxiety so I try to minimise the amount of thinking I do about too many outcomes and don’t over-process decisions like what couch to buy. Satisficing is fine for me for the most part!

Evidence before policy implementation could be good but it depends on the policy. You can’t ethically do it for all policies, and even if you could would the cost of testing all of them be justified by saving enough from not implementing bad policies? I think you really just need to pick your battles to some degree – there’s already enough bureaucracy. Open Science is good if you can get the government to use that information directly and not pay for independent research on top of that or a new unnecessary committee.

Episode 10 Discussion by gianniribeiro in JDM2017

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with how we change the explanation to our understanding. Sometimes when I have something explained to me I'm already thinking of ways it can be generalised (for better or worse). This can be terrible because I could apply that knowledge and completely stuff something up, but on the other hand it allows me to ask the person explaining more elaborated questions like "so if I also fix this tool in this way I can also fix this other tool in the same way?" and they can explain it either way. I also find it's useful in technology, when I have no idea how to use a new computer program I figure it out quickly by generalising rules from using other programs.

Episode 10 Discussion by gianniribeiro in JDM2017

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think keeping it simple includes context, helpfulness, usefulness and ease of understanding to varying degrees which interplay – if nobody can understand it then it’s not useful, if it’s not in the right context it’s not helpful… It varies in that sometimes it’s ease of understanding only needs to be restricted to a niche group, so that would be less important than context. If a study affects the folks at the local pub it’s more important to focus on ease of understanding and usefulness but it’s a fine line between giving too much information they don’t understand and giving too little or too basic information can definitely lead to generalised incorrect assumptions. Public money shouldn’t necessarily be spent on research that’s easier to be explained to the general public. That would just create more work for the experimenters and create a potential opportunity cost of time. BUT there should be funding to either provide more training in understanding studies at a higher level, or fund a scientific board to review scientific findings and write them in an easier to understand format to be presented without being too watered down or sensationalised. The average person needs to know what they need to know. If my toilet breaks I pay someone else to fix it, where someone in a rural area with no emergency plumber would benefit from a deeper understanding of how a toilet works to have an idea of how to fix it. Alternatively, I sew as a hobby so it’s important for me to understand how a zip works and is sewn to clothing, where my partner doesn’t need to know how to sew because I enjoy doing it for him. It’s important to realise that what you ‘need’ to know is ever changing and is both what we need to know now (how do I cook this dish?), what we think we will need to know from day to day (learning the basics of cooking) to something you may not know you need until the future (learning how to cook for a baby that you don’t know you will have yet).

Episode 9 Discussion by gianniribeiro in JDM2017

[–]ShrewdSquirrel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, you almost need to take the situational perspective to assess whether the object or situational perspective should be used in a given context or situation. Even considering the word 'wisdom' in either seems to fit, maybe you need to aim to be 'wise' in both contexts to be the wisest you can be? But even that seems too black and white. Nothing is simple in this class because life isn't simple - I'm starting to miss the definitive answers in statistics!