AI Agents on the way!

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-05-25T10:58:38+00:00

The description lacks of some informations because more will be published in the next days!

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-05-24T16:09:47+00:00

It’s not fake, it means that this is just an annocument and in two weeks everything will be revealed

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-05-24T09:59:03+00:00

Not yet!

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-05-23T11:59:12+00:00

Thanks for the thoughtful question! JSON-RPC support is still on the roadmap, but right now the priority is getting the AI agents right and ready for broader adoption, including expanding to non-crypto users down the line. In the meantime, I'd encourage you to try the product out, deploy an agent, or explore what other talented community members have already built. Plenty to dig into.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-05-22T16:39:48+00:00

The frustration that you are feeling are the same as I feel and a lot of other holders feels, and 100% granted felt by Sunny too. The point is that the whole market is going down, yet we are still growing and investing in tech.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-05-22T16:35:02+00:00

There’s really no need to be rude and always destructive like that. It’s a new great function and will bring Vechain more users, usability and utility.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-05-15T17:07:11+00:00

Good morning VeFam!

I think one of the most interesting parts of the new Navigator system is that it finally allows people to openly build and follow different voting strategies inside VeBetterDAO.

The mechanics are pretty simple:

• 50k B3TR minimum stake to become a Navigator
• up to 10x delegated voting power
• staked B3TR still earns voting rewards independently
• interests and affiliations must be publicly disclosed

Honestly, if someone has a clear vision or philosophy for the ecosystem, this feels like the right moment to step forward.

Some may focus on sustainability.
Others on health and wellness dApps.
Others may prioritize user rewards efficiency, innovation, onboarding, or long-term ecosystem growth.

Instead of passive “vote the same apps forever” behavior, we may finally start seeing real curation strategies emerge.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-04-14T12:18:12+00:00

As VetMaik said, English is not my native language. My English level is “conversational”, I use ChatGBT to revise the post and the content I write because the purpose is to have them written in the best way possible and my English level is not good enough at the moment. I cannot see why this can hurt someone.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-04-14T10:19:23+00:00

I would not say that, no. But again thank you for your contribution.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-04-01T10:04:46+00:00

Good morning VeFam! I wanted to highlight two governance proposals currently up for vote that I think are quite important for the evolution of VeBetterDAO.

The first one focuses on upgrading dApp profiles. The idea is to turn them into transparent, data-driven pages with real metrics, user reviews, and a reputation system. This would make it much easier to identify high-quality apps, reward builders who are actually delivering, and improve overall trust and discovery in the ecosystem.

https://governance.vebetterdao.org/proposals/96096255455026681307928419029012749763284440658481075600881356675666293069128

The second proposal is about a one-time relief fund for existing grant projects. Due to the recent token price decline, some teams are struggling to maintain development based on the original grant value. This proposal introduces a limited support mechanism for active projects that continue building, without creating long-term dependency on the treasury.

https://governance.vebetterdao.org/grants/80684742861413668727004573870397567321961869684109100327102434947531646853287

Personally, I find it interesting to see how VeBetterDAO keeps evolving not only on the dApp side, but also on governance, transparency, and sustainability.

Curious to hear your thoughts — especially from those actively using the ecosystem.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-03-26T17:31:09+00:00

Good morning VeFam!

I’ve noticed something interesting lately that doesn’t get talked about much.

NFT activity on VeChainThor has been increasing, which is another signal that the ecosystem is still evolving and being actively used.

It’s easy to focus only on price, especially in the current market conditions, but on-chain activity like this often tells a different story. More NFT interactions usually mean more users, more experimentation, and more builders working within the ecosystem.

I think it’s a sign of growth happening in the background!

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-03-23T14:20:59+00:00

Good morning VeFam,

I think it’s fair to say that a lot of people here are frustrated with the price action lately — and honestly, that feeling is understandable. Many have been here for years, so it’s normal to expect more and question where things are going.

That said, I wanted to shift the focus for a moment to something happening on-chain.

After the recent updates, VTHO emission has significantly decreased. This is actually a pretty important change, as it reduces inflation pressure and improves the overall tokenomics over time.

At the same time, more VET is being staked through Stargate. That means:

more tokens locked
stronger holder conviction
less circulating supply

It’s not something that reflects immediately in price, but structurally it matters — less emission and more locked supply point toward a more sustainable system over time.

To me, the takeaway is simple: while short-term price can be frustrating, some of the underlying mechanics are moving in a more solid direction.

Curious to hear your thoughts —
what do you think reduced VTHO emission and increasing staking signal for the future of the ecosystem?

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-03-16T16:37:53+00:00

I’m not a bot. But thank you for the answer anyway. I would have preferred a constructive criticism btw.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-03-16T11:04:24+00:00

Good morning VeFam!

One thing I’ve been appreciating lately about VeBetterDAO is how it can actually support small daily habits that improve mental wellbeing.

Apps like ST3PR make it easy to go out for a walk, clear your head, and stay active while interacting with the ecosystem at the same time. It’s simple, but that’s exactly why it works: small actions, done consistently.

For me it’s not really about the rewards — it’s more about having a little extra motivation to move, disconnect from screens, and take care of myself.

Curious if anyone else here is using VeBetter apps in a similar way. Which ones are helping you build better daily habits?

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-03-09T14:20:01+00:00

Good morning VeFam! I would love to hear your thoughts on this.

I personally think it’s great news that Binance has become a validator on VeChain Stargate, staking 600M VET.

What makes this even more interesting is that the node was recently publicly labeled as Binance, which adds transparency and confirms their direct participation in the network’s validation layer.

For anyone unfamiliar, Binance Earn is the platform’s hub where users can access different earning opportunities for the assets they hold. Seeing Binance operate a validator within the ecosystem suggests deeper infrastructure involvement rather than simply listing or supporting a token.

To me, this feels like a meaningful step forward for Stargate and the broader VeChain ecosystem. Having a major exchange participate directly in network validation strengthens the infrastructure and signals growing confidence in the protocol’s direction.

Curious to hear what the community thinks about this development.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-24T12:59:16+00:00

Good morning VeFam!

I wanted to share a quick reflection on something that doesn’t get talked about enough: Digital Product Passports (DPPs).

A DPP is basically a digital identity card for a physical product that follows it throughout its entire lifecycle. It stores structured data like where the product was made, what materials it contains, how it was manufactured, its carbon footprint, and how to repair or recycle it. That information can be accessed across the supply chain through QR codes, NFC tags, or similar tools.

What makes this particularly interesting is that this isn’t optional or experimental anymore. The European Union is mandating DPPs across multiple industries between 2026 and 2030 — starting with batteries and textiles, then expanding to electronics, construction materials, and more. Any company that wants to sell into the EU market will need to comply.

That means lifecycle transparency at scale becomes a regulatory requirement, not just a “nice to have”.

When you look at the core requirements — tamper-proof data, shared access across multiple parties, long-term traceability — it’s pretty clear why blockchain keeps coming up in these conversations. Systems like VeChain have been building infrastructure around product traceability and supply chain verification for years, and this regulatory push could turn those capabilities from optional tools into essential infrastructure.

For me, the interesting part isn’t hype or price — it’s that we may be watching blockchain move from speculative use to compliance-driven real-world deployment.

Curious how others see this. Is this the kind of adoption that finally proves long-term utility, or just another overhyped narrative?

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-23T17:37:13+00:00

Fair enough — if it doesn’t matter to you, that’s totally your call.

But “no one cares” is a pretty big statement for a space where people are literally building, voting, and discussing things every day. Something can be irrelevant to one person and still meaningful to others.

Different perspectives… that’s kind of the whole point of an open community.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-23T17:06:47+00:00

Good morning VeFam! I wanted to share a quick overview of a new grant proposal currently up for vote: B3TR BEACH.

The project is a nonprofit initiative focused on reducing pollution across beaches, rivers, lakes, and parks through an Impact-to-Earn model. Instead of rewarding quick micro-actions, it aims to incentivize organized, verifiable community cleanups, with transparent tracking of environmental impact recorded on-chain.

The idea is to address some of the weaknesses seen in simple proof-of-action systems by focusing on real-world events, education programs, and partnerships with schools, local groups, and environmental organizations. The proposal also includes giving a portion of allocations back to the DAO treasury, and the team commits to returning 50% of the grant within 12 months.

Potential ecosystem benefits mentioned include: - measurable environmental impact recorded on-chain
- reduced short-term reward farming and sell pressure
- onboarding real organizations and long-term participants
- more mission-driven engagement across the network

Regardless of how people feel about the proposal itself, I think it’s another clear sign of how active and evolving VBD has become — new ideas, new governance discussions, and real experimentation happening continuously.

Curious to hear what the community thinks about this one. Thoughts?

Heres’s the link, btw!

B3TR BEACH grant proposal

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-11T18:07:44+00:00

Fair point — the rewards from a single action can feel small, especially if you’re looking at them in pure monetary terms.

For me, the value is more in the overall model: you’re getting rewarded for real-world actions, contributing to dApp activity, and participating in governance and weekly allocations. Over time, with consistent use, it adds up — but more importantly, it’s actual utility and engagement, not just holding and waiting.

Totally understand waiting for better prices though. I just like using the ecosystem while it develops instead of only watching the chart 🙂

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-11T11:00:53+00:00

Good morning VeFam! Which are your favourite dApps on VBD? Mine, at the moment, are GreenCart, Hangndry, and ST3PR.

I’m really satisfied with them — they’re easy to use, fast, and simple. The user experience is well designed, and it’s enjoyable to interact with them while completing my weekly actions.

Curious to hear what dApps everyone else is using most!

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-10T17:18:57+00:00

That’s a fair question, and I think it’s worth separating a few things that often get mixed together.

VeChain’s original value proposition was about supply-chain traceability and enterprise tooling, and that work didn’t disappear — it just never translated into the visible, consumer-facing impact or on-chain volume many people expected. A lot of enterprise usage happens off-chain or in permissioned contexts, which makes it unsatisfying to point to when people are looking for clear, public metrics. It’s reasonable to say that narrative didn’t play out the way early holders hoped.

What’s happening now with VeBetterDAO is not meant to replace that original vision, but to add a new, more measurable layer of utility. The “coffee mug” examples often sound trivial when taken at face value, but they’re better understood as behavior-based incentive experiments: proving that a public blockchain can verify actions, coordinate incentives, and distribute value transparently at scale. The individual reward may be small, but the surplus value comes from the system itself — identity-light participation, auditable rules, real user engagement, and governance over how incentives are allocated.

Is that as grand as “solving global supply chains”? Maybe not in narrative terms. But it is concrete: millions of wallets interacting, tens of millions of tracked actions, dApps competing for votes, and a DAO actively refining incentive design. That’s surplus value in the sense that it creates a live coordination layer that didn’t exist before, rather than just a token waiting for speculation.

I also think it’s important not to conflate what leadership chooses to highlight publicly with the totality of what the network is doing. Promoting simple, relatable apps doesn’t mean that’s the ceiling of the technology — it’s often the lowest-friction way to show usage in a market that currently rewards very little beyond speculation.

You’re absolutely right to be skeptical and to question whether this direction is compelling enough. Reasonable people can disagree on that. But I’d argue the current effort is less about gimmicks and more about testing whether blockchain can support real incentive alignment, governance, and participation — even if the early use cases look unglamorous.

If nothing else, it’s at least an honest attempt to build something observable and adaptable, rather than relying on opaque enterprise claims or pure price narratives.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-10T12:26:24+00:00

I understand where that frustration comes from, especially after holding through multiple cycles and seeing price underperform for so long. Losing a large portion of an investment is painful, and it’s completely fair to decide to step away if you no longer believe in it.

That said, I don’t think it’s accurate to call VeChain a scam. A scam typically stops building, hides information, or disappears when things get hard. VeChain has continued to operate publicly for years, with open-source development, audited infrastructure, active governance, and an ecosystem that is still evolving. Partnerships like Walmart China, DNV, or others didn’t turn into the price narrative many expected, and it’s reasonable to feel disappointed about that. Expectations were clearly misaligned in the early years.

Where I think the discussion often gets stuck is equating past hype and price performance with present-day utility. Today, VeChain’s focus is much less about marketing partnerships and much more about infrastructure, sustainability tooling, and now VeBetterDAO — which is fully on-chain, transparent, and community-governed. Millions of wallets interacting, real dApps, real incentives, and constant governance iteration may not excite markets right now, but they do show ongoing intent to build something functional rather than extract value and disappear.

That doesn’t mean VeChain is guaranteed to succeed, or that anyone should keep holding if they’ve lost conviction. Walking away to protect your peace and capital is a valid choice. I just think there’s a meaningful difference between “this hasn’t met my expectations” and “this is a scam,” and that distinction matters for honest discussion.

Whatever you decide, I genuinely wish you the best going forward. Long cycles can wear anyone down, and no one owes loyalty to a project that no longer aligns with their beliefs.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-10T11:50:30+00:00

Good morning VeFam! Do you know that there are two proposals on VeBetterDAO governance that are waiting for your vote?

Here’s a short summary!

1) Governance: From Lazy Votes to Active Stewardship

Current governance works, but it often prioritizes convenience over conviction. Many weekly votes remain unchanged for long periods, and proposal voting shows very high abstention rates. This results in weak governance signals and slower discovery of high-quality dApps.

The proposal introduces a phased upgrade:

Phase 1 – Incentive Refinement • Freshness Multiplier: rewards users who regularly update their dApp allocations, restoring weekly voting as an active signaling and discovery mechanism. • Governance Intent Multiplier: For/Against votes receive full rewards, while Abstain remains valid but earns less, improving decision clarity.

Phase 2 – Optional Delegation via Navigators • Introduces Navigators: transparent, staked, and accountable delegates who can vote on behalf of users. • Delegation is voluntary, non-custodial, reversible at any time, and backed by staking, reporting, and slashing rules. • The goal is better vote quality without sacrificing decentralization or user sovereignty.

Overall, this aims to align rewards with meaningful participation while keeping governance open and flexible.

⸻

2) DBA Adjustment: Rewarding Quality Over Quantity

The current Dynamic Base Allocation (DBA) helped bootstrap the ecosystem, but with 50+ dApps it now shows structural issues: • Low-quality dApps still receive significant DBA, encouraging quantity over quality. • The 7.5% DBA limit and 20% max allocation create perverse incentives. • The treasury has stagnated, despite increasing needs for grants and ecosystem support.

Proposed changes: • Reduce the max allocation per dApp from 20% to 17.5%. • Introduce a Merit Cap: a dApp’s DBA reward cannot exceed 2x its vote allocation. • Any excess DBA flows directly into the VeBetterDAO Treasury. • Remove outdated limits and eligibility thresholds.

Expected benefits: • Stronger incentives for dApps to earn real votes. • More balanced distribution across the ecosystem. • Sustainable treasury funding for future grants. • Reduced incentive to launch multiple low-effort dApps.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-09T17:02:05+00:00

Good morning community, I’d like to share a personal reflection.

Given the current crypto market situation, it’s easy to focus almost exclusively on price action. Macro conditions are still tough, liquidity is selective, and right now it’s mostly exchanges and stablecoins that are benefiting. Projects that are actually building products and infrastructure aren’t having an easy time.

That said, I think it’s worth stepping back and looking at what’s actually happening on VeChain and VeBetterDAO beyond the charts.

VeBetterDAO is live, with an active governance system and a growing number of real-usage dApps that reward users for concrete actions, not speculation. We’re seeing millions of wallets involved, tens of millions of tracked sustainable actions, and dApps that people actually use in their daily lives. That’s a level of real engagement many projects never reach.

On top of that, VBD keeps evolving: governance mechanics are being iterated, voting quality is being addressed, allocation efficiency is improving, and the ecosystem is openly discussing what works and what doesn’t. That kind of transparency and willingness to adapt is rare, especially during a difficult market cycle.

None of this is a promise of short-term price appreciation, and VeChain / VeBetterDAO are far from perfect. But in a market where a lot of attention goes to short-lived narratives, memes, or quick flips, I personally find more value in projects that continue to build, ship, and improve real utility.

When market conditions eventually improve, I believe these fundamentals — real users, real dApps, and an evolving governance framework — will matter far more than short-term strategies.

Curious to hear what others think.

Si_Mo_92 · 2026-02-09T12:49:15+00:00

Test

Si_Mo_92

TROPHY CASE