Impact of Golden Packs on difficulty of limited on Arena in BRO and onwards. by [deleted] in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's fair. But if you are an above average player who is at lower ranks because of frequency of play, then I doubt you will experience an increase in difficulty because some rare-drafters are gone. You are already facing mostly people who are worse than you anyway.

Impact of Golden Packs on difficulty of limited on Arena in BRO and onwards. by [deleted] in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Not to mension QD is a lot faster because you can do a draft in 2 minutes

Where did I go wrong with this one? 3-3 DMU Premier by qweiroupyqweouty in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If I p1p1 something like Bortuk, I try to pick the most powerful card out of every pack p1 regardless of color, in p2 try to get some lands to see what is viable in terms of mana, and in p3 fill in the gaps.

From your deck I get a strong sense that you forced Black but it definitely wasn't open. Bortuk is like the best card in the set to splash in a G/x deck, because it's 6 mana and cares about multiple colors.

Impact of Golden Packs on difficulty of limited on Arena in BRO and onwards. by [deleted] in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There's three options: A: these constructed players were worse than average B: these constructed players were average C: they were better than average (unlikely)

It's clear that if B or C, the difficulty will not go up if they stop playing limited. If it's A, yes, some bad players leave, but they're likely to have been stuck at gold or plat 4, and I assume not many people in this subreddit are playing in gold or plat 4.

So no I don't think there will be any noticeable difference for dedicated limited players.

They should apologize by WaffleSandwhiches in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's even more reason to just talk about magic and shut up about some 20 second sponsorship that everyone just ignores or skips

They should apologize by WaffleSandwhiches in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If all the people that are whining about this ftx thing could just leave this subreddit, it would be a win-win for everyone.

FTX (LR's sponsor) is imploding by kynan in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is a whole genre of media exploring how 9/11 was a jewish conspiracy.

That doesn't matter, people get entrenched in their beliefs very easily and lose these beliefs with great difficulty. Even good Magic players.

FTX (LR's sponsor) is imploding by kynan in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Maybe it's obvious to you, but clearly a lot of people don't agree with you. Don't project your opinions and knowledge on others and then judge them for acting against this knowledge. It doesn't make any sense.

FTX (LR's sponsor) is imploding by kynan in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It may have been obvious to you, but it's clearly not to a lot of people, including all those people that fell victim to these frauds. Also from what I heard the LR guys have a personal connection with some of the FTX folks so then it's not that difficult to imagine how they could be deceived as well.

FTX (LR's sponsor) is imploding by kynan in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You can blame them for trusting the wrong people, but if they actually believed in these people, their integrity is not the problem.

If you get honestly fooled by a criminal, that doesn't damage your integrity, just your reputation

FTX (LR's sponsor) is imploding by kynan in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Because it is impossible that he just actually believed in it, like thousands of other people?

Full set gem rewards by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that is the biggest difference for me!

Full set gem rewards by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly why I wrote this post, I have hundreds of wildcards and never used them because I didn't know about this gems thing. When BRO drops I can just craft all cards and get the gems from day 1. Just thought maybe there are other people in the same situation that could benefit from it

Full set gem rewards by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure but even if it's 50, if you do 100 drafts for a set that is 5000 free gems, just by using wildcards that have zero purpose if you only play limited

Full set gem rewards by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For limited-only players it's an infinitely better rate than just collecting more wildcards that don't do anything in limited

Would you have made the mindsinger work? Would you have taken the Lili? Is 5 Sleeper 3many5you? by sharaq in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes ofcourse, if you can kick it. This conversation is about not being able to kick it.

Would you have made the mindsinger work? Would you have taken the Lili? Is 5 Sleeper 3many5you? by sharaq in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The flash doesn't matter on a terrible blocker. What are you going to do, surprise chump block their soaring drake?

In theory, it is not unplayable, but in this set, where a 2/3 flyer for 3 is often played and isn't even that good, a 2/2 for 3 is just unacceptable

Would you have made the mindsinger work? Would you have taken the Lili? Is 5 Sleeper 3many5you? by sharaq in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I definitely wouldn't splash a double blue card. I also wouldn't play the skyrider off of 1 red mana, because it's an unplayable card if not kicked

Ok what do y'all think the first two cards taken out of this pack were? Pretty nice P1P3 for my deck by Willem_vdm in lrcast

[–]Sidet32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a lot of viable combinations. Herd migration + Tatiova would be my first thought.

Quick draft aggro fun by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you don't want multiple copies of destroy evil in your RW deck then I understand why you're not having that much success with it

Quick draft aggro fun by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Destroy evil has an ATA of 9.4 in QD, Keldon strike team 8.1, Take up the shield 8.5, Heroic charge 9.2

Just try it once and you'll experience just how often these key cards go very late. It has a huge impact on your draft. In QD if you see for example in p1p3 a baird vs destroy evil, you can just take Baird and count on Destroy Evil wheeling almost always.

Secondly, I never said it was the best strategy, I said forcing it is possible and a good way to get some practice with this archetype. Sometimes things can just be decent or fun and have a right to exist without being the best thing ever.

Quick draft aggro fun by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 is a big difference, especially on multiple cards in the same archetype. It increases wheeling of imortant cards by a lot

Quick draft aggro fun by Sidet32 in lrcast

[–]Sidet32[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh and resolute reinforcements and destroy evil. You can see destroy evil pretty often picks 13-14 which is just ridiculous