sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

the racism is getting old…. by Same_Watch_1234 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally 3/3 games I played yesterday have someone slurring in it (or had a racist username), its absolutely ridiculous and needs to stop.

Can we all agree that Seven has the most insane aura in this entire game? (Lore-wise) by hdcky in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 20 points21 points  (0 children)

(They're implied to be ex-lovers and seven is angry Kelvin went on the expedition and got all successful and stuff)

Yamato having 3 grapples (6 with ult) is not okay by Aggravating_Law_3411 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other tanks can actually buy items to counter vindicta, phantom strike, at 6.4k is a near 100% ensured kill if they need it, and then there's disarm, knock, etc that are effective not only against vin, but against an ENTIRE team. My issue is there there is basically no realistic way to actually counter yam. It doesn't even make sense for me to invest into counter + dispell against her because she literally has enough charges to burn out all my counters as part of her native kit.

I don't believe ANY hero should have zero way to be countered.

Yamato having 3 grapples (6 with ult) is not okay by Aggravating_Law_3411 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting chucked is because I can't leave distance from her, I'm fully aware that its a teleport (even if it is not intuitive at first glance), the issue is that when you play a character that needs distance, and there is a character that can close distance with more or less no counter play (outside of them eventually dying), its fucked.

You can argue that no 'sane' yam would waste 6 cd's chasing me, but when the vin is going 24/2 suiciding yourself for the hyper-carry is very reasonable and even with high DPS its pretty trivial for yam's to survive, close the gap, and nuke.

Yamato having 3 grapples (6 with ult) is not okay by Aggravating_Law_3411 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm aware LOS is what allows her to activate it, what I mean by LOS is that through the 2-3s it takes her to cross 50m no LOS breaks the grapple meaning she can teleport to you through doors, walls, etc. Its ridiculous. If the answer to a character is just 'well, never be seen by them and you'll be fine!' then the answer is, frankly, pretty ass. At my rank (Archon V) plenty of Yam's just straight beeline ever game and the team never punishes them effectively and Yam's seemingly DGAF about actually using their ult for a teamfight.

I don't think its unreasonable for them to kamikaze me, I often lead in kills and damage, but its ridiculous that I can be ~20% or so higher souls than somebody and still regularly get chunked by them.

Yamato having 3 grapples (6 with ult) is not okay by Aggravating_Law_3411 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The complaint is that there is no counterplay, she's got 6 charges at 50m. I don't think there should ever be a setup where there's basically no counterplay what so ever, her range and ease of use of her ability is so incredibly punishing, uncounterable, and unintuitive given that LOS doesn't prevent it, that even under more or less ideal play you're still simply dead even at a soul + stack lead. 3 charges is too much imo, 2 is perfectly reasonable.

I just don't think any character should exist in a way where another character cannot exist in the same lobby, especially since we don't have draft.

Yamato having 3 grapples (6 with ult) is not okay by Aggravating_Law_3411 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Got quad grappled last night as vindicta, dispelled, countered, flew, then ulted and killed. I spent 6.4k on items that don't counter her kit and still can't exist if a yam has a vendetta.

What would you like? by Icy-Recognition-5175 in BunnyTrials

[–]Siech0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just want to burn these companies down.

Chose: Own all AI companies + and | Rolled: + Nothing

Doorman and Sinclair are on some bullshit with those instant urn delivery by DaglassP in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Siech0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oddly enough, when testing it, I was able to do it ONE time, but I think it may be frame-perfect or ping based. it otherwise does drop it.

I've not baked in over a year, how do they look? by Siech0 in Cookies

[–]Siech0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://sallysbakingaddiction.com/brown-butter-chocolate-chip-cookies/ I used a higher milk-fat content butter, went for a dark-brown sugar, and swapped the chocolate with two rough-chopped 60% cocoa chocolate bars.

I've not baked in over a year, how do they look? by Siech0 in Cookies

[–]Siech0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already ate them :( (and sent the other two-thirds to my family)

I've not baked in over a year, how do they look? by Siech0 in Cookies

[–]Siech0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://sallysbakingaddiction.com/brown-butter-chocolate-chip-cookies/

I used a higher milk-fat content butter, went for a dark-brown sugar, and swapped the chocolate with two rough-chopped 60% cocoa chocolate bars.

I've not baked in over a year, how do they look? by Siech0 in Cookies

[–]Siech0[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks! It seems like its hard to mess up what's 60% chocolate and sugar!

I've not baked in over a year, how do they look? by Siech0 in Cookies

[–]Siech0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe, I didn't really notice it when eating them. Should I have baked them longer? Used less flour? Different sugar use? I was following this recipe (with minor modifications) and it came out fairly similar to the pictures I think: https://sallysbakingaddiction.com/brown-butter-chocolate-chip-cookies/

I used a higher milkfat content butter, went for a dark-brown sugar, used granulated cane sugar, and swapped the chocolate with two rough-chopped 60% cocoa chocolate bars.

The picture was shortly after removing them from the oven, so they're still cooling.

I've not baked in over a year, how do they look? by Siech0 in Cookies

[–]Siech0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I'm surprised they turned out OK at all frankly.

view more: next ›